24.07.2018 Views

Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

248 P a r t I I I : H i g h - F r e q u e n c y B u i l d i n g - B l o c k A n t e n n a s<br />

Elevated Ground-Plane <strong>Antenna</strong><br />

There are three key differences between a ground-mounted vertical and an elevated<br />

ground-plane vertical:<br />

• Radials located some distance above ground must be treated as resonant<br />

elements.<br />

• Fewer radials are needed to ensure that most of the transmitter power is<br />

delivered to the radiating element instead of being dissipated in lossy earth.<br />

• An elevated GP vertical may have fewer nearby obstacles (e.g., trees and<br />

buildings) and thus enjoy a cleaner shot at low elevation angles.<br />

Once the base of an elevated ground-plane vertical is raised above a certain height<br />

(many consider l/8 a reasonable minimum), its radials act less like long, skinny capacitors<br />

and more like the other half of a vertical dipole. As such, it is important for<br />

maximum radiation plus ease of matching that their lengths to be approximately l/4 at<br />

the operating frequency, although the exact length will vary somewhat with radial<br />

“droop”—the vertical angle at which the radials come away from the base of the monopole.<br />

However, the farther away the lossy earth is from these elevated radials, the less<br />

effect it has and the easier it is to capture the bulk of the return currents of the vertical<br />

radiating element in a small number of radials. Recent experiments based on detailed<br />

modeling using NEC-4 (see Chap. 25) indicate that somewhere between two and eight<br />

radials per band is quite adequate for elevated antennas, although unless at least three<br />

equispaced radials are used, there will be some variation in field strength with azimuth<br />

(compass heading). The improvement in radiated field characteristics for more than<br />

three or four radials is quite subtle, however, as long as the GP antenna is kept at least<br />

l/8 off the ground. Models of a l/4 antenna show little difference between horizontal<br />

and drooping radials other than to raise the feedpoint impedance from 25 to 40 Ω.<br />

Keep in mind that these discussions of height above earth ground refer to the height<br />

of the electrical ground, not the sod. Depending upon ground conductivity and groundwater<br />

content, the effective height of earth ground may lie some distance beneath the<br />

surface. The actual depth is best found from experimentation and may, unfortunately,<br />

vary with precipitation and with the season—especially if the ground freezes and/or<br />

the local water table changes greatly.<br />

Vertical versus Horizontal Polarization<br />

A question frequently asked is: “Would I be better off putting up a horizontal dipole or<br />

a vertical?” As usual, the answer is: “It depends.” Here are some factors often found to<br />

be helpful in arriving at an answer:<br />

• Is there a “convention” regarding antenna orientation (polarization)? Usually<br />

because of historical patterns of usage that have evolved, certain groups have<br />

standardized on specific polarizations. The 11-m citizens band, for instance,<br />

uses vertical polarization because of the high percentage of vehicular mobile<br />

users. As a result, almost all house- or tower-mounted antennas—even<br />

multielement Yagis and quads—for 27 MHz are vertically polarized. The same

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!