Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

24.07.2018 Views

226 P a r t I I I : H i g h - F r e q u e n c y B u i l d i n g - B l o c k A n t e n n a s L Tuner L /4 Coax VSWR meter L /4 Transmatch To XMTR Random Figure 8.6 Random-length longwire antenna. However, off-center feedlines suffer from an inherent lack of balance between the two sides of the feedline because there is no electrical or physical symmetry at the point where they attach to the antenna. As a result, it is much harder to keep the feedline from radiating and becoming an unintended part of the antenna. Windom The Windom antenna (Fig. 8.7) has been popular since the 1920s. Although Loren Windom is credited with the design, there were actually multiple contributors. Coworkers at the University of Illinois with Windom who should be cocredited were John Byrne, E. F. Brooke, and W. L. Everett. The designation of Windom as the inventor was probably due to the publication of the idea (credited to Windom) in the July 1926 issue of QST magazine. Additional (later) contributions were rendered by G2BI and GM1IAA. The Windom is a roughly half-wavelength antenna that will also work on even harmonics of the fundamental frequency. Like the off-center-fed dipole, the basic premise is that a dipole’s feedpoint resistance varies from about 50 Ω at the center to about 5000 Ω at either end, depending upon the location of the feedpoint. In the Windom antenna of Fig. 8.7A, the feedpoint is placed about one-third the way from one end, presumably where the impedance is about 600 Ω. The Windom antenna works “moderately” well—but with some caveats. It is important to again recognize that the return path for a single-conductor feedline is the ground system underneath the antenna and feedline. In distinct contrast to similar horizontal dipoles that are center fed, the extent and quality of the ground beneath the antenna is a major factor in the overall radiation efficiency of the Windom. Further, this

C h a p t e r 8 : M u l t i b a n d a n d T u n a b l e W i r e A n t e n n a s 227 Insulator A 0.18 B 0.32 Insulator Rope Downlead (#12 or #14) A 0.18 B 0.32 468 AB 0.50 Feet F MHz Coax to XMTR Tuner Coax to XMTR — or — Ant Lo-Z XMTR C1 Hi-Z C2 Ant Figure 8.7A Windom antenna. is an inherently unbalanced radiating system with all the concomitant issues of “RF in the shack”. One could just as easily view the Windom as a lopsided “T” antenna or as an inverted-L with a secondary section of top loading attached; in either of those cases, the feedline itself is the primary radiator. The choice of tuning unit for the Windom will depend on the frequencies it is to be used on, but, as mentioned earlier, it is likely that a very good tuner capable of remov- 44.33' 136' 4:1 BALUN Tuner XMTR Figure 8.7B Coaxial-fed Windom.

226 P a r t I I I : H i g h - F r e q u e n c y B u i l d i n g - B l o c k A n t e n n a s<br />

L<br />

Tuner<br />

L /4<br />

Coax<br />

VSWR meter<br />

L /4<br />

Transmatch<br />

To XMTR<br />

Random<br />

Figure 8.6 Random-length longwire antenna.<br />

However, off-center feedlines suffer from an inherent lack of balance between the<br />

two sides of the feedline because there is no electrical or physical symmetry at the point<br />

where they attach to the antenna. As a result, it is much harder to keep the feedline from<br />

radiating and becoming an unintended part of the antenna.<br />

Windom<br />

The Windom antenna (Fig. 8.7) has been popular since the 1920s. Although Loren Windom<br />

is credited with the design, there were actually multiple contributors. Coworkers<br />

at the University of Illinois with Windom who should be cocredited were John Byrne,<br />

E. F. Brooke, and W. L. Everett. The designation of Windom as the inventor was probably<br />

due to the publication of the idea (credited to Windom) in the July 1926 issue of QST<br />

magazine. Additional (later) contributions were rendered by G2BI and GM1IAA.<br />

The Windom is a roughly half-wavelength antenna that will also work on even<br />

harmonics of the fundamental frequency. Like the off-center-fed dipole, the basic premise<br />

is that a dipole’s feedpoint resistance varies from about 50 Ω at the center to about<br />

5000 Ω at either end, depending upon the location of the feedpoint. In the Windom<br />

antenna of Fig. 8.7A, the feedpoint is placed about one-third the way from one end,<br />

presumably where the impedance is about 600 Ω.<br />

The Windom antenna works “moderately” well—but with some caveats. It is important<br />

to again recognize that the return path for a single-conductor feedline is the<br />

ground system underneath the antenna and feedline. In distinct contrast to similar horizontal<br />

dipoles that are center fed, the extent and quality of the ground beneath the<br />

antenna is a major factor in the overall radiation efficiency of the Windom. Further, this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!