Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586
226 P a r t I I I : H i g h - F r e q u e n c y B u i l d i n g - B l o c k A n t e n n a s L Tuner L /4 Coax VSWR meter L /4 Transmatch To XMTR Random Figure 8.6 Random-length longwire antenna. However, off-center feedlines suffer from an inherent lack of balance between the two sides of the feedline because there is no electrical or physical symmetry at the point where they attach to the antenna. As a result, it is much harder to keep the feedline from radiating and becoming an unintended part of the antenna. Windom The Windom antenna (Fig. 8.7) has been popular since the 1920s. Although Loren Windom is credited with the design, there were actually multiple contributors. Coworkers at the University of Illinois with Windom who should be cocredited were John Byrne, E. F. Brooke, and W. L. Everett. The designation of Windom as the inventor was probably due to the publication of the idea (credited to Windom) in the July 1926 issue of QST magazine. Additional (later) contributions were rendered by G2BI and GM1IAA. The Windom is a roughly half-wavelength antenna that will also work on even harmonics of the fundamental frequency. Like the off-center-fed dipole, the basic premise is that a dipole’s feedpoint resistance varies from about 50 Ω at the center to about 5000 Ω at either end, depending upon the location of the feedpoint. In the Windom antenna of Fig. 8.7A, the feedpoint is placed about one-third the way from one end, presumably where the impedance is about 600 Ω. The Windom antenna works “moderately” well—but with some caveats. It is important to again recognize that the return path for a single-conductor feedline is the ground system underneath the antenna and feedline. In distinct contrast to similar horizontal dipoles that are center fed, the extent and quality of the ground beneath the antenna is a major factor in the overall radiation efficiency of the Windom. Further, this
C h a p t e r 8 : M u l t i b a n d a n d T u n a b l e W i r e A n t e n n a s 227 Insulator A 0.18 B 0.32 Insulator Rope Downlead (#12 or #14) A 0.18 B 0.32 468 AB 0.50 Feet F MHz Coax to XMTR Tuner Coax to XMTR — or — Ant Lo-Z XMTR C1 Hi-Z C2 Ant Figure 8.7A Windom antenna. is an inherently unbalanced radiating system with all the concomitant issues of “RF in the shack”. One could just as easily view the Windom as a lopsided “T” antenna or as an inverted-L with a secondary section of top loading attached; in either of those cases, the feedline itself is the primary radiator. The choice of tuning unit for the Windom will depend on the frequencies it is to be used on, but, as mentioned earlier, it is likely that a very good tuner capable of remov- 44.33' 136' 4:1 BALUN Tuner XMTR Figure 8.7B Coaxial-fed Windom.
- Page 194 and 195: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 196 and 197: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 198 and 199: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 200 and 201: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 202 and 203: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 204 and 205: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 206 and 207: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 208 and 209: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 210 and 211: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 212 and 213: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 214 and 215: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 216 and 217: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 218 and 219: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 221 and 222: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 223 and 224: C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n
- Page 225 and 226: CHAPTER 7 Large Wire Loop Antennas
- Page 227 and 228: C h a p t e r 7 : L a r g e W i r e
- Page 229 and 230: C h a p t e r 7 : L a r g e W i r e
- Page 231 and 232: C h a p t e r 7 : L a r g e W i r e
- Page 233 and 234: C h a p t e r 7 : L a r g e W i r e
- Page 235 and 236: CHAPTER 8 Multiband and Tunable Wir
- Page 237 and 238: C h a p t e r 8 : M u l t i b a n d
- Page 239 and 240: C h a p t e r 8 : M u l t i b a n d
- Page 241 and 242: C h a p t e r 8 : M u l t i b a n d
- Page 243: C h a p t e r 8 : M u l t i b a n d
- Page 247 and 248: CHAPTER 9 Vertically Polarized Ante
- Page 249 and 250: C h a p t e r 9 : V e r t i c a l l
- Page 251 and 252: C h a p t e r 9 : V e r t i c a l l
- Page 253 and 254: Quarter-wave vertical radiator Insu
- Page 255 and 256: C h a p t e r 9 : V e r t i c a l l
- Page 257 and 258: C h a p t e r 9 : V e r t i c a l l
- Page 259 and 260: C h a p t e r 9 : V e r t i c a l l
- Page 261 and 262: C h a p t e r 9 : V e r t i c a l l
- Page 263 and 264: C h a p t e r 9 : V e r t i c a l l
- Page 265 and 266: C h a p t e r 9 : V e r t i c a l l
- Page 267 and 268: C h a p t e r 9 : V e r t i c a l l
- Page 269 and 270: Directional High-Frequency Antenna
- Page 271 and 272: CHAPTER 10 Wire Arrays When a singl
- Page 273 and 274: C h a p t e r 1 0 : W i r e A r r a
- Page 275 and 276: C h a p t e r 1 0 : W i r e A r r a
- Page 277 and 278: Wire 2 C h a p t e r 1 0 : W i r e
- Page 279 and 280: C h a p t e r 1 0 : W i r e A r r a
- Page 281 and 282: C h a p t e r 1 0 : W i r e A r r a
- Page 283 and 284: CHAPTER 11 Vertical Arrays Despite
- Page 285 and 286: C h a p t e r 1 1 : V e r t i c a l
- Page 287 and 288: C h a p t e r 1 1 : V e r t i c a l
- Page 289 and 290: C h a p t e r 1 1 : V e r t i c a l
- Page 291 and 292: C h a p t e r 1 1 : V e r t i c a l
- Page 293 and 294: C h a p t e r 1 1 : V e r t i c a l
226 P a r t I I I : H i g h - F r e q u e n c y B u i l d i n g - B l o c k A n t e n n a s<br />
L<br />
Tuner<br />
L /4<br />
Coax<br />
VSWR meter<br />
L /4<br />
Transmatch<br />
To XMTR<br />
Random<br />
Figure 8.6 Random-length longwire antenna.<br />
However, off-center feedlines suffer from an inherent lack of balance between the<br />
two sides of the feedline because there is no electrical or physical symmetry at the point<br />
where they attach to the antenna. As a result, it is much harder to keep the feedline from<br />
radiating and becoming an unintended part of the antenna.<br />
Windom<br />
The Windom antenna (Fig. 8.7) has been popular since the 1920s. Although Loren Windom<br />
is credited with the design, there were actually multiple contributors. Coworkers<br />
at the University of Illinois with Windom who should be cocredited were John Byrne,<br />
E. F. Brooke, and W. L. Everett. The designation of Windom as the inventor was probably<br />
due to the publication of the idea (credited to Windom) in the July 1926 issue of QST<br />
magazine. Additional (later) contributions were rendered by G2BI and GM1IAA.<br />
The Windom is a roughly half-wavelength antenna that will also work on even<br />
harmonics of the fundamental frequency. Like the off-center-fed dipole, the basic premise<br />
is that a dipole’s feedpoint resistance varies from about 50 Ω at the center to about<br />
5000 Ω at either end, depending upon the location of the feedpoint. In the Windom<br />
antenna of Fig. 8.7A, the feedpoint is placed about one-third the way from one end,<br />
presumably where the impedance is about 600 Ω.<br />
The Windom antenna works “moderately” well—but with some caveats. It is important<br />
to again recognize that the return path for a single-conductor feedline is the<br />
ground system underneath the antenna and feedline. In distinct contrast to similar horizontal<br />
dipoles that are center fed, the extent and quality of the ground beneath the<br />
antenna is a major factor in the overall radiation efficiency of the Windom. Further, this