24.07.2018 Views

Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 p a r t I I I : h i g h - F r e q u e n c y B u i l d i n g - B l o c k A n t e n n a s<br />

Shortened Coil-Loaded Dipoles<br />

At lower frequencies, the half-wavelength dipole is often too long for installations where<br />

real estate is at a premium. The solution for many operators is to use a coil-loaded shortened<br />

dipole such as one of those shown in Fig. 6.14. In the absence of any loading, a<br />

shortened dipole (i.e., one that is appreciably less than a half-wavelength) exhibits capacitive<br />

reactance at its feedpoint. This reactance can be canceled with an inductance<br />

placed at almost any point along the radiator; in Fig. 6.14A and B, coils are placed at 0<br />

percent (i.e., at the feedpoint) and 50 percent of the element length, respectively.<br />

Figure 6.14C is a table of inductive reactances (in ohms) as a function of the shortened<br />

radiator’s length, expressed as a percentage of a half-wavelength. It is likely that<br />

the maximum allowable percentage will be dictated by your specific installation, but<br />

the general rule is to pick the largest percentage that will fit within the available space.<br />

For overall antenna efficiency, coils in the middle of both sides are preferable to coils<br />

at the feedpoint, for two reasons:<br />

• Coils at the feedpoint have more current going through them, hence greater<br />

ohmic (resistive) losses.<br />

• Coils at the feedpoint are replacing the highest current portions of the antenna<br />

with lumped components that don’t radiate anywhere near as well.<br />

Example 6.4 Suppose you have about 40 ft of backyard available for a 40-m antenna that<br />

normally needs about 65 ft for a half-wavelength. What value of inductor do you need?<br />

Solution Because 39 ft is 60 percent of 65 ft, you could use this value as the design point<br />

for this antenna. From the table, a shortened dipole that is 60 percent of a full l/2 dipole’s<br />

length requires an additional inductive reactance of 950 Ω with the loading coils<br />

at the midpoint of each radiator element to allow the feedline to “see” a purely resistive<br />

feedpoint impedance. Rearrange the standard inductive reactance equation (X L = 6.28<br />

FL) to the form<br />

X<br />

L<br />

L ( µ H) = (6.10)<br />

6.28 F(MHz)<br />

where L = required inductance, in microhenrys<br />

F = frequency, in megahertz (MHz)<br />

X L = inductive reactance obtained from the table in Fig. 6.14C.<br />

If the antenna is cut for 7.150 MHz, the calculation is as follows:<br />

XL<br />

L( µ H) =<br />

6.28 F(MHz)<br />

(950)<br />

=<br />

(6.28)(7.15)<br />

= 20.7µ<br />

H<br />

Keep in mind that the inductance calculated here is approximate; it might have to be<br />

altered by cut-and-try methods.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!