Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

24.07.2018 Views

C h a p t e r 6 : D i p o l e s a n d D o u b l e t s 195 L 300- parallel line or twin lead To XMTR Figure 6.11A Folded dipole fed with 300-Ω line. Assuming we can match the 300-Ω line to the transmitter, we have the same power going into the folded dipole as we did into the single-wire dipole. For equal power, if one feedpoint current is half the other, its corresponding feedpoint voltage must be twice the other (because P = VI = constant). Thus, in free space the transmission line “sees” a feedpoint impedance of Z FOLDED 2V = I 2 V = 4 I = 4Z DIPOLE DIPOLE DIPOLE DIPOLE DIPOLE ≈ 290 Ω (6.9) The impedance step-up ratio for a two-wire folded dipole is 4:1 if the two conductors are of equal diameter. When they’re not, the relationship is more complicated but the impedance step-up is generally proportional to the ratio of the unfed wire diameter to the fed wire diameter. Thus, a folded dipole can be designed to provide a specific feedpoint impedance to the transmitter and transmission line, within limits, by making one of the two wires larger than the other. In many installations, the best feedline for the folded dipole will be 300-Ω twin-lead or, better yet, open-wire line connected to a balanced wire ATU at the transmitter end.

196 p a r t I I I : h i g h - F r e q u e n c y B u i l d i n g - B l o c k A n t e n n a s 4:1 BALUN Figure 6.11B Folded dipole fed with coaxial cable. 75- coax to XMTR Although coaxial cable can be connected to the antenna feedpoint directly, it will experience a roughly 6:1 VSWR over its entire length. Another popular alternative is to use a 4:1 balun transformer at the feedpoint (Fig. 6.11B). This arrangement provides a reasonable match between the folded dipole and either 52- or 75-Ω coaxial transmission line. Adding a third wire, also unfed, on the opposite side of the fed wire from the first unfed wire, creates the three-wire dipole. A three-wire center-fed dipole offers twice the 2:1 SWR bandwidth of a conventional dipole. The impedance step-up ratio for conductors of equal diameter is 9:1, so this antenna makes an excellent mate to 600-Ω open-wire line. As before, all three wires are tied together electrically at both ends of the antenna. For both the folded dipole and the three-wire dipole, the fundamental tradeoffs when compared to a single-wire dipole are increased bandwidth on the design band versus increased weight and loss of multiband capability. Bow-Tie Dipole Another method for broadbanding a half-wave dipole is to use two identical dipoles fed from the same transmission line and arranged to form a bow-tie shape, as shown in Fig. 6.12. The use of two identical dipole elements on each side of the transmission line increases the apparent conductor cross-sectional area so that the antenna has a slightly improved length/diameter ratio. The bow-tie dipole was popular in the 1930s and 1940s, and became the basis for the earliest television receiver antennas. (Each analog TV channel is 6 MHz wide, so a broadband antenna is required to cover each group of adjacent channels: low VHF, high VHF, and UHF.) The bow-tie also attained some measure of popularity in amateur cir- I R I I R 75- coax to XMTR I = Insulator R = Rope Figure 6.12 Bowtie dipole.

196 p a r t I I I : h i g h - F r e q u e n c y B u i l d i n g - B l o c k A n t e n n a s<br />

4:1<br />

BALUN<br />

Figure 6.11B Folded dipole fed with coaxial cable.<br />

75- coax<br />

to XMTR<br />

Although coaxial cable can be connected to the antenna feedpoint directly, it will experience<br />

a roughly 6:1 VSWR over its entire length.<br />

Another popular alternative is to use a 4:1 balun transformer at the feedpoint (Fig.<br />

6.11B). This arrangement provides a reasonable match between the folded dipole and<br />

either 52- or 75-Ω coaxial transmission line.<br />

Adding a third wire, also unfed, on the opposite side of the fed wire from the first<br />

unfed wire, creates the three-wire dipole. A three-wire center-fed dipole offers twice the 2:1<br />

SWR bandwidth of a conventional dipole. The impedance step-up ratio for conductors<br />

of equal diameter is 9:1, so this antenna makes an excellent mate to 600-Ω open-wire line.<br />

As before, all three wires are tied together electrically at both ends of the antenna.<br />

For both the folded dipole and the three-wire dipole, the fundamental tradeoffs<br />

when compared to a single-wire dipole are increased bandwidth on the design band<br />

versus increased weight and loss of multiband capability.<br />

Bow-Tie Dipole<br />

Another method for broadbanding a half-wave dipole is to use two identical dipoles<br />

fed from the same transmission line and arranged to form a bow-tie shape, as shown in<br />

Fig. 6.12. The use of two identical dipole elements on each side of the transmission line<br />

increases the apparent conductor cross-sectional area so that the antenna has a slightly<br />

improved length/diameter ratio.<br />

The bow-tie dipole was popular in the 1930s and 1940s, and became the basis for the<br />

earliest television receiver antennas. (Each analog TV channel is 6 MHz wide, so a<br />

broadband antenna is required to cover each group of adjacent channels: low VHF, high<br />

VHF, and UHF.) The bow-tie also attained some measure of popularity in amateur cir-<br />

I<br />

R<br />

I<br />

I<br />

R<br />

75- coax<br />

to XMTR<br />

I = Insulator<br />

R = Rope<br />

Figure 6.12 Bowtie dipole.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!