24.07.2018 Views

Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C h a p t e r 5 : a n t e n n a A r r a y s a n d A r r a y G a i n 165<br />

Horizontal dipole<br />

(end view)<br />

4<br />

+<br />

Distant receiving antenna<br />

Figure 5.6B Combined fields from antenna<br />

and image at a distant receiver.<br />

–<br />

Image dipole<br />

r 1<br />

Outer circle =<br />

5.3 dB greater<br />

than for a<br />

dipole in<br />

free space.<br />

4<br />

r 2<br />

Figure 5.6C Total received field strength versus<br />

elevation angle broadside to dipole of (A).<br />

phase at the other antenna, and the line of maximum field strength from this particular<br />

array is directly above the two dipoles. At elevation angles between straight up (90<br />

degrees) and the horizon (0 degrees), the faraway field strength takes on intermediate<br />

values, as shown in Fig. 5.6C.<br />

<br />

Because the maximum radiated signal strength for a horizontal dipole at heights of<br />

l/4 or less above a ground plane is straight up in the air, the antenna is often called a<br />

cloud burner, and it is ideal for near-vertical incidence skywave (NVIS) communications.<br />

However, the broadside pattern is actually quite robust until the vertical elevation (or<br />

takeoff) angle drops under 30 degrees (the 3-dB point). There are far, far worse antennas<br />

for all-around use on 80 and 40 m than a l/2 dipole at a height of roughly l/4 (35 ft)!<br />

Above 30 degrees, at those elevation angles that result in the radiated fields from<br />

the original horizontal antenna and its image arriving at a distant point in phase, or<br />

nearly so, the resulting signal at the receiver is twice the amplitude of the signal that<br />

would have come from the original antenna in free space. The image antenna—which<br />

is really a way of looking at the ground reflection effect—has increased the received<br />

signal strength of our original antenna by nearly 6 dB relative to the free-space case!<br />

In general, r 1 and r 2 (the distances from the dipole and its image to a remote receiving<br />

point) are not equal, so the phase shift between the two radiated signals is something<br />

other than zero. The degree of reinforcement or cancellation at any given elevation<br />

angle above an arbitrary horizontally polarized antenna depends on the height of that<br />

antenna above ground. As the height of the antenna above ground is increased, eventually<br />

the phase shift of the wave from the image antenna on its way to distant receiving<br />

points increases to where the maximum radiated field is no longer straight up in the air.<br />

With increasing height above ground, the elevation angle corresponding to maximum

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!