24.07.2018 Views

Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C h a p t e r 3 : A n t e n n a B a s i c s 107<br />

<strong>Antenna</strong> Resistance and Losses<br />

A current flowing in the antenna encounters three kinds of resistance:<br />

• Radiated power expended in the form of radiation can be thought of as an I 2 R R<br />

loss. R R (also written R RAD ) is called the radiation resistance.<br />

• Current flowing along the antenna conductor dissipates a certain amount of<br />

energy in the form of heat. In this I 2 R J loss, R J is the ohmic resistance. The ohmic<br />

resistance is not the same as the wire’s dc resistance as measured on a<br />

conventional ohmmeter or volt-ohmmeter (VOM); rather, it is somewhat higher<br />

because of the presence of skin effect, which limits the flow of RF energy to the<br />

surface of the conductor according to a complicated function of frequency and<br />

the specific parameters of the conducting material.<br />

• There is also an I 2 R SH loss because of the leakage, or shunt, resistance of dielectric<br />

elements such as insulators. This effect of this resistance is often lumped in with<br />

the ohmic resistance.<br />

The purpose of any antenna system is to convert as much source energy as possible<br />

to electromagnetic radiation. The energy dissipated by what we call the radiation resistance<br />

R R is thus the useful part of the total power applied to the antenna system. Because<br />

the actual power from the source is split between R RAD and the ohmic and shunt<br />

resistance terms, the latter two resistances should be kept as low as possible. The radiation<br />

resistance of a center-fed half-wave antenna in free space is 73 W; in a properly<br />

designed installation, the radiation resistance should be large compared to the loss resistances,<br />

and most of the available energy will be radiated as useful signal. The halfwave<br />

antenna is, therefore, a very efficient radiator under most circumstances. In theory,<br />

the very short dipole we used at the beginning of our analysis can have a radiated signal<br />

comparable to that of the l/2 dipole (with the main lobe theoretically only 0.4 dB<br />

less), but its R RAD is so low and its X C so large that it is virtually impossible to avoid dissipating<br />

most of the transmitter output power in R O and R SH of the antenna as well as<br />

similar or larger loss resistances in the matching network for such a short antenna.<br />

Half-Wave Dipole Feedpoint Impedance<br />

A half-wave dipole can be fed anywhere along its length; it does not have to be fed at<br />

the center, even though there are many advantages to doing so. Because the voltage and<br />

current vary along the length of the half-wave dipole, and because the impedance at<br />

any point on the dipole is equal to the voltage at that point divided by the net current<br />

passing through that point, the impedance will vary along the length of the antenna. If<br />

V is divided by I at each point of the voltage and current curves of Fig. 3.13, the result<br />

is the impedance curve Z. The impedance is a minimum of about 73 W at the center<br />

point and rises to 2500 W or more at the ends. In general, however, the impedance is<br />

complex (a mixture of resistive and reactive terms) throughout most of the antenna<br />

length.<br />

If the antenna is cut to a length corresponding to exact resonance the feedpoint impedance<br />

at the center will be purely resistive. However, if the antenna is longer or<br />

shorter than resonance, reactance reappears. When the antenna is shorter than its resonant<br />

length, the feedpoint impedance will exhibit capacitive reactance; conversely,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!