Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Banalitate (ocultatæ): capitalismul nu urmæreøte sæ producæ decît profit<br />
nelimitat. Bunurile øi mærfurile sînt instrumentele, cæile spre acest<br />
profit, ca flel final al capitalismului øi al logicii capitalului.<br />
Raport deci oblic, între profit øi artificialitate.<br />
Profitul în principiu nelimitat este artificial, nu poate fi produs decît în<br />
mod artificial øi produce mereu mai multæ artificialitate, deci fals.<br />
Capitalismul falsificæ.<br />
Partea tehnologicæ de fals creøte inevitabil odatæ cu profitul.<br />
TRIUMFUL CAPITALISMULUI<br />
=<br />
DOMINAfiIA ARTIFICIALULUI<br />
Atenflie! Repet: acestea nu sînt, cum ar putea sæ paræ, judecæfli de valoare,<br />
ci revelaflii „apocaliptice“, adicæ tîrzii, „finale“, ale artificialitæflii omului,<br />
creator de proteze.<br />
De-a lungul istoriei, protezele umane au fost simbolice, „spirituale“.<br />
Abia acum devin masiv materiale, omul „virtualizîndu-se“, „spiritualizîndu-se“.<br />
Capitalismul falsificæ øi artificializeazæ, deci este în logica lucrurilor sæ<br />
mintæ, sæ nu recunoascæ.<br />
În Estul nostru, întîlnire øi întrunire istoricæ de condiflii terminale ca „parousie“<br />
a OMULUI CONSUMATOR, de evacuare a modernitæflii, de<br />
delapidare a modernitæflii, judecatæ øi condamnatæ færæ proces (nu ca<br />
în Occident).<br />
Se evidenfliazæ ca esenfliale pentru capitalismul omului, sub condiflia<br />
de consum øi consumatoare, fals, artificial producætoare, a omului<br />
DETURNAREA DE FONDURI<br />
DELAPIDAREA<br />
CORUPfiIA<br />
Acestea nu sînt accidentale, ci se dovedesc, abia acum øi aici, în Est<br />
øi, în general, în zonele pe care le-am numit integrat-marginale, ca fiind<br />
esenfliale. În Est ca situaflie exemplaræ de tranziflie în tranziflie.<br />
Sîntem exemplari! Ar trebui sæ facem øcoalæ!<br />
Træim în øi din delapidarea øi deturnarea de fonduri a modernitæflii.<br />
Deturnare de fonduri, consumare de fonduri ca deturnare de capital,<br />
a capitalului de la mæøtile sale istorice. Træim în denudarea capitalismului,<br />
nu într-o abatere de la capitalism. Abia aici træim în capitalismul<br />
împlinit, nu într-un capitalism neajuns, „eøuat“.<br />
Procesul esenflial al capitalismului aici, în Est (øi, încæ o datæ, în zonele<br />
marginal-integrate), se reveleazæ a fi CORUPfiIA.<br />
Corupflia nu este un accident, o defecfliune care ar trebui øi ar putea<br />
fi remediatæ – altfel decît fals, artificial.<br />
Integratæ marginal, ca posibilitate de delocalizare (dintotdeauna, capitalismul<br />
s-a aflat în delocalizare: capitalism nomad, capitalism în derivæ<br />
øi în bejenie, cæutînd resurse noi øi piefle noi: Lume Nouæ, ceva de consumat<br />
prin producflie øi consumatori pentru aceastæ producflie consumatoare,<br />
disimulat sacrificialæ),<br />
CORUPfiIA SALVEAZÆ CAPITALISMUL,<br />
care poate continua sæ-øi oculteze dezvæluirile „sectar“ marginale în<br />
zonele cu dezvoltare organicæ densæ, suprapopulatæ.<br />
Revelaflia se produce întotdeauna la margini. De ce n-am ajuta-o sæ<br />
ocupe, sæ „cîøtige“ centrul, miezul?<br />
These three stand out as essential, for the capitalism of man, under the consumption<br />
and consuming, falsely, artificially productive condition of man:<br />
EMBEZZLEMENT<br />
MALVERSATION<br />
CORRUPTION<br />
All this is not accidental, but proves – only now and here, in the East and generally in<br />
the regions that I called “integrated-marginal” – to be essential. The East, the exemplar<br />
case of frame-transition.<br />
We are exemplar! We should keep a school!<br />
We live in and on the embezzlement and malversation of modernity.<br />
Embezzlement, consumption of funds as deflection of capital, as deflection of capital<br />
from its historical masks. We live in the denudation of capitalism, not in a deviation<br />
from capitalism. It is only here that we live in an accomplished capitalism, not in an<br />
undeveloped, “stranded” capitalism.<br />
Here, in the East, and, once again, in the marginal-integrated regions, CORRUPTION<br />
proves to be the essential process of capitalism.<br />
Corruption is not an accident, a failure that could and should be remedied – otherwise<br />
than falsely, artificially.<br />
Marginally-integrated, as relocation possibility (capitalism has forever been relocating:<br />
nomad capitalism, adrift and fleeing capitalism, looking for new resources and<br />
new markets: the New World, something to consume by production and consumers<br />
for this consuming, disimulatedly sacrificial production),<br />
CORUPTION SAVES CAPITALISM,<br />
which can continue to occult its “sectary”-marginal disclosures in the over-populated,<br />
densely organically developed regions.<br />
The revelation always takes place in the margins. Why shouldn’t we help it seize,<br />
“gain ground” on the centre, on the core?<br />
The postcommunist East: pure consumers, the marginalized essence of capitalism.<br />
They share precisely the condition of the “new poor” described by Bauman, who cannot<br />
any longer figure as missionary “proletarians”, but who realize and practically<br />
accomplish capitalism, thus saving it. “The new poor” do not represent a direct<br />
resource, they are not exploited, they do not run from but after exploitation, seeking<br />
integration and internal segregation, aspiring to become “even more consumer than<br />
consumption itself”.<br />
It is exactly what happens now in Romania, in the East, what the mass media are showing<br />
but do not know how (and do not want to) describe. Marginal truth, essential truth.<br />
PARADIGM SHIFT<br />
THE NEW CONDITION OF CRITIQUE<br />
In order stop producing artificialness and falseness, that is to say in order to stop<br />
accrediting the illusion of a possible voluntaristically radical, “modernist” “restoration”<br />
of man – which is nothing else than “playing the game” of the capital itself –<br />
and in order to finally become constructive, as it has been always asked to become,<br />
the critique should not any longer negatively qualify or negatively appraise man’s<br />
negativity phenomena. Man, or at least the perception of man, cannot be unlocked<br />
unless man’s essential, inherent negativity is accepted, acknowledged and creatively<br />
pozitivized.<br />
Capitalism has integrated and voraciously feeds itself on what wanted to oppose it<br />
and elude it – the art, the creation. The critique of (cacophonic) capitalism must then<br />
come closer to art, too, must propose alternatives and quit the game of creation<br />
in which it always comes out on the wrong side and which profits the adversary.<br />
Exacerbated by the intellectuals of the apotheotic-monstrous, prophetic end of<br />
180