Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
+ (presences of art)<br />
nu poate fi decît consumat, relaflia vitalæ, existenflialæ cu Binele øi cu<br />
Adeværul nu poate fi decît una de consum, într-o relaflie palidæ, abia<br />
sensibilæ, cu cea, tare, de cuminecare.<br />
La producerea lumii de bunuri, a Binelui ca lume-piaflæ, nu avem acces,<br />
nu simflim cæ participæm, nu participæm decît insensibil, mediat, colectiv.<br />
Tehnologia, lumea-tehnologie le produce (øi se reproduce) automat.<br />
Noi nu ne putem individualiza „de masæ“ decît consumîndu-le. Producflia<br />
de bine este imanent, imediat, contiguu inaccesibilæ (nimeni nu<br />
øi-o poate apropria individual). Nu se oferæ decît consumului, nu poate<br />
fi decît consumatæ, træitæ øi „întrupatæ“ prin consum, „ingurgitatæ“.<br />
În mod esenflial, consumul trebuie somatizat, adicæ, prin intermediul<br />
lui, ne oferim unica øansæ a realizærii de sine prin construirea de trupuri<br />
noi.<br />
Metemsomatozæ de piaflæ: zilnic, un trup nou. Din trup în trup, pe urma<br />
accesoriilor.<br />
OMUL ØANTAJAT<br />
Dupæ perioada aøa-numitului „Ræzboi Rece“ øi politica aøa-numitæ a „disuasiunii<br />
nucleare“, lumea a devenit o situaflie obiectivæ de øantaj. Azi<br />
sîntem dublu presafli, dublu øantajafli: cu trecutul (pæcatele øi dezastrele<br />
modernitæflii) øi cu viitorul luminos al realizærii prin consum. Øantajul obiectiv<br />
este cel mai adesea imperceptibil, pentru cæ este interiorizat.<br />
PRODUCfiIA-CONSUM<br />
(AL DOILEA ESEU DESPRE DEØEU)<br />
Modernitatea nu putea sæ reuøeascæ altfel, producînd, de fapt, direct<br />
reziduuri, în mod direct rezidual. Modernitatea produce aruncînd, eliminînd,<br />
produce de aruncat: su(s)pin, cuvînt de ordine, mod de întrebuinflare,<br />
indicaflii de folosire.<br />
Modernitatea produce reziduuri, produsele modernitæflii sînt din capul<br />
locului gata consumate: gunoaie. Consumul este anticipat, ca normæ.<br />
Pe piaflæ nu pot sæ existe decît bunuri deja consumate, ca indicaflie<br />
pentru a fi consumate (øi cum). Pentru cæ producflia consumæ, producflia<br />
modern-capitalistæ este prin ea însæøi øi în mod primordial, mai înainte<br />
de a – øi pentru a putea – fi producflie de nou, consum de vechi, de<br />
deja-existent. În capitalism, consumæm deøeuri ale lumii, reziduuri ale<br />
existentului, ne înfruptæm din gunoaie.<br />
SOCIETATEA CONCENTRAfiIONARÆ DE CONSUM<br />
Comparaflie, ca tipuri organizate de spafliu industrializat, între lagærele<br />
de concentrare, gulag øi hipermarketuri.<br />
Promiscuitatea oameni-mærfuri. Indistincflie.<br />
Nu sîntem mînafli, duøi, deportafli, ne deportæm singuri.<br />
Decizia este deja luatæ prin modul concentraflionar de organizare a<br />
spafliului: sæ cumpæræm totul sau mæcar cît mai mult. Blocarea, înecarea,<br />
sufocarea alegerii, a programului (de viaflæ, de cumpæræturi), mærfurile<br />
trimit de la una la alta færæ distanflæ, sînt îngræmædite, suprapuse øi alæturate<br />
færæ distanflæ, færæ treceri, unele în altele, contopite, hiperidentificate,<br />
toate la fel, de fapt – una singuræ: BINELE DE CONSUM,<br />
BINELE PRIN CONSUM, CONSUMUL – UNICA CALE SPRE<br />
BINE (cacopitalism).<br />
Discernæmînt blocat, 0/1: totul sau nimic.<br />
instrumentality of consumption we offer ourselves the only chance of self-realization<br />
through the making of new bodies.<br />
Market metemsomatosis: everyday, a new body. From one body to another,<br />
following the track of accessories.<br />
BLACKMAILED MAN<br />
After the period of the so-called “Cold War” and the politics of the so-called “nuclear<br />
dissuasion”, the world has become an objective situation of blackmail. Today we are<br />
pressed twice, blackmailed twice: with our past (the sins and the disasters of modernity)<br />
and with the bright future of realisation through consumption. The objective<br />
blackmail is often imperceptible, since it is interiorized.<br />
PRODUCTION-CONSUMPTION<br />
(THE SECOND ESSAY ON WASTE)<br />
Modernity could not have succeeded otherwise: in fact, it produces directly residues,<br />
directly residually. Modernity produces by throwing away, by eliminating, it produces<br />
to be thrown away: supine (suspire), signal word, simple-to-use instructions, user’s<br />
guide.<br />
Modernity produces residuals; the products of modernity are downright alreadyconsumed:<br />
trash. Consumption is anticipated, as a norm. There cannot be on the<br />
market other goods than those already consumed, which indicate that (and how)<br />
they should be consumed. Since production consumes, the modern-capitalist<br />
production is by itself and primordially consumption of the old, of the already-existing,<br />
even before being – and in order to be able to be – production of the new.<br />
In capitalism, we consume the waste of the world, the residues of the existent;<br />
we make a feast of trash.<br />
CONSUMER CONCENTRATION SOCIETY<br />
Comparison between the concentration camps, the Gulag and the hypermarkets,<br />
understood as organized types of industrialized space.<br />
The promiscuity men-commodities. Indistinction.<br />
We are not goaded, taken, deported, we are deporting ourselves.<br />
The decision is already taken, given the concentrationist organization of space: let’s<br />
buy everything, or, at least, the most of it. Blockage, drowning, suffocation of choice,<br />
of the (life, shopping) programme, the commodities call each other at no distance,<br />
are huddled together, piled up and aggregated without distance, without passages,<br />
merged, hyper-identified, being all the same, in fact only one: the CONSUMER<br />
GOOD, GOOD THROUGH CONSUMPTION, CONSUMPTION – THE ONLY WAY TO<br />
THE GOOD (caco-pitalism).<br />
Blocked discernment, 0/1: all or nothing.<br />
MORAL DIGITALIZATION<br />
Again: a dive without transition, directly from communism and postcommunism<br />
(as false interlude, as false purgatory: the purgatory is the – tax – haven) into<br />
globalization. Only the transition to democracy, which is the condition of capitalism,<br />
although it is permanently and necessarily violated by the latter.<br />
We stepped not on firm, stable soil, as we are asked to, as we are invited to think,<br />
without trouble, but in the midst of a macro-transition of capitalism itself.<br />
The formal-political occults the informal-economical, seriously affecting the social-moral.<br />
Emphasis was placed exclusively on our possible unreadiness for democracy, but no<br />
one in the world can be fully prepared for democracy.<br />
However, there was no emphasis at all on our unreadiness for capitalism.<br />
177