anale 5.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

90 LUCR.( ST., T.C.C.S.; CAR'I'OFUL, 1975; VOL. V. MEINL, G., EFFMERT, B., 1966 - Uber die "Schalen und Fleischfestigkeit" von KaTtaffe[knollen. ZUiOhter:. voI. 36. 6. MUREŞAN, S., 1975 - Comportarea la vătămări mecanice a tuberculilor din soiurile de cartof admise la înmulţire. Anale IeCS BraJşov, voI. V Cartof. SPECHT, A., 1968 - Hypothesen und technische Moglichkeiten fur einen wirtschaftlichen Kartoffelertrag. KaTtoffelhau, 7. ULLRICH, G., 1962 -- Die Eignung de' Kartoffelsorten de" DDR fur einen vollmechanisierten Anbau und Schlussfolgerungen filr die Kartoffelzilchtung. I-IabilitationsSichTiNen Berlin. VOLBRACHT, O., 1952 - Uber mechanische Beschădigungen an Kartoffeln. Diss. Bonn. VOLBRACHT, O., und KUHNKE. U., 1956 - Mechanische Beschădigungen an Kartoffeln. Ka;rtoffelbau 7. COMPARATIVE EVALUAiTION OF METHODS FOR ESTtA'BL3:SHING THE RESISTANCE OF POTATO TUBERS TO MECHANICAL DAMAGE UNDER LABOR.i\.TORY CONDITIONS SUMMA.,RY R,esuilts of the tes,tlS on th:e l"1esis!tanoe ,to mechani'Cal damalge of pot8.lto tUJbelrs of a numiber of 41 vaTieties belonging to the collection of the Research In:s:titulte for Potato ,and Beet Growing, B!r1alŞov, are presente1d. Three methods were evalu... ated, Le.: determination of tuberelastieity, evaluation of peel resistance and eVlaluation of maximal resistance to mechanilcal daJmage. Elasticity tes1Js eviidencetl the hi!glh vlarilabiiity of this index in the studied variety ,assortment, Le. values Danging between 1!2.9 anld 75.1. RobUlstla, Quinrta anid Ruta proved to be the best vareties showing an eJ.astilCity index ralligi'ng hetween612.5-71.5, whHe Weka,rag.iJs il2..9), FlOTa (113.!8) >aIlJd Datura (14.5) evidenceld tihe smaHest values. PeeI resist,a'l1ce varied between 1.4-5.3. Correl1ation iCoeffident r = 0.950*** inldicates a strong relatiollishLp betweentuiber ellasticity anti peru resistance. Evaluation of maximal resilS'tall'Ce of potato tU/bem to mechankal dramage seems mor,e cond.:usiiVe for pI'lactke. In vi:ew of thiiS fact, maximal ,resilSta'l1ICe index of poiato tuberls ta mec'hanical damage Wlas ,e'valUiated in the tested variety laSisor1Jment; the establisheid values raJllged between 15.5-8:8.2. Characterization of potato vla;rieties from the point 0:11 vi,ew of theilr suitabi:l,ity for mechankall ha~vesing shoU1ld be conduced on the bas[s of their max1'mal resilsl1:iance ta meooanilcal d~mage. DAS VEHHAUr'EN DER ERMI'DTLUNGSMiETHODEN DER WI:DElRSTAlNDSFĂHIGKEIT GEGENUBER MECHAN,JSCHE iBESOHĂDIGUNGENDER KARTIOFFELKNOLLEN, UNTER LAJBORBE!DINGUNGEN ZUSA:MMEiNlFASSUNG Es wuriden d'i'e Tatsalchen bezug1kh der WiderstandsfahigkeH gegenu:ber mechanische KnoBenibelSchădi:giungen bei einen 4,1 Alftensortiment dea:- Sammlun,g des Forsehungiill\Slti'turtes fur RuheiIlbau raus Br'aJşO'V, darges,tellt. Es wurden verg1edJchsma:Sisilg d~ei Methodren alllla ' lys'i'elf1t nahmJkh die Ermă.,tltlung der KnoHelIlelas1tizi,tUrat, die EifmittluiIlg deif HautfelStiig~ei,t und die Ermiittlung des Hochstwiderstanides gelg'euber mechanische Beschadinguugen. Die Teste bezuglich der Ela'stizitat zeiigen die betraohtlic:he Velraniderliehkeit deifjeni,gen im analysierten Sortiment; di1e W'eTite liegen zwisehen 12,9 nnd 75,1. Als hes1Je Arten bewies.en
RonrCA GHIMBASAN, Determinarea rezistenţei la vătămare a tuberculilor 9:1 sich Robusta, Quinta, Rute, mit einer Ela:stizHatszahl zwischen 62,5-75,1, und die schw** a,chsten walI"en Wekarargis (12,9), Film'a (13,8) und Datura (14,5). DiE;! HauJtfes.tigkeit variier,te 'in den Grenzen von 1,4-5,,3. Der Karrelationskoeffizient r = 0,950 gitt eine sehr enge Korrelaltioill zwi!sohen der Elastizitat und der Hautfesbigkeit. an. FUr die Praxis scheint dile E,rmittlung des Hochstwid
Page 3 and 4:
LUCRARI ŞTIINŢIFICE VOL. V
Page 5:
l\UNISTERUL AGRICULTURII, INDUSTRIE
Page 8 and 9:
1. NEGUŢI: Unell'e rezuLt.ate expe
Page 10 and 11:
8 F. CIOROIANU: Prelimina,ry re:suJ
Page 12 and 13:
10 RODICA PĂLTI;NEANU UJnd GH, SIP
Page 14 and 15:
12 . l-JOP05IHY - Dpe)l.BapnTeJlbHh
Page 16 and 17:
14 LUCR.\ ST., T.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 18 and 19:
16 LUCR.' ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1
Page 20 and 21:
LUCR.i ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,1975
Page 22 and 23:
20 LUCR.' ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 24 and 25:
22 LUCR.' ST., I.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 26 and 27:
21 . LUCR.' ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL
Page 28 and 29:
LUCR. ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 30 and 31:
28 - LUCR. iST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 32 and 33:
32 r.ueR.' ST., J.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 34 and 35:
34 LUCR.\ ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 36 and 37:
jJu,t1chJ 0,5i _ .. -- sol!lreu } -
Page 38 and 39:
38 LUCR.{ ST., r.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 40 and 41: f-D o ~14j V~arlit>peste q se aduna
Page 42 and 43: 42 LUCR. iST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 44 and 45: 44 LUCR. :ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1
Page 46 and 47: ~ m Io-l ~ n;:c Ul r 3 H h h In n :
Page 48 and 49: 48 LUCR.'ST., LC.C.S., CAHTOFUL. "1
Page 50 and 51: 50 LUCR.\ ST.• l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL
Page 52 and 53: 52 I.UCR;ST., I.C.C.S., CARTOFUt..,
Page 54 and 55: 54 LUCR.~ ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 56 and 57: 56 LUCr:t; ST., LC.C,S., CAH'I;'OFU
Page 58 and 59: 58 . LUCR.' ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL
Page 60 and 61: 60 LUCR.~ ŞT·., I.G.C.;5." CARTOF
Page 62 and 63: 62 LUCR.( ST.,I.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1
Page 64 and 65: 64 LUCR. t ST., l.C.C.S'., 'CARTOFU
Page 66 and 67: 66 I~UCR> ST., r.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 68 and 69: 68 LUCR:, ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 70 and 71: 70 LUCR: ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 19
Page 72 and 73: 72 LPCR,' ~T•• l.C.r.s.. CAHTOF
Page 74 and 75: 74 LUCR.( ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1
Page 76 and 77: 'l6 LUCR. I ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 78 and 79: 78 LUCR.~ ST., Le.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1
Page 80 and 81: RO LUCR. ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 19
Page 82 and 83: 82 LUCR.( ST., l.C.C.S.,
Page 84 and 85: 84 LUCR.iST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 19
Page 86 and 87: eo ~ Tabelul 2 Corelaţia privind i
Page 88 and 89: 38 r;nCR.\ ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 92 and 93: 92 LUCR.1 ST., I.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 94 and 95: fJ; 29" N::-~/5 ~ ,~ ,,-{ r" \/ I M
Page 96 and 97: C,O: O) y.: o of- 0IXI + 62X2 + b J
Page 98 and 99: Analiza unui sistem cauzat care a d
Page 100 and 101: Analiza unor sisteme cauzale care a
Page 102 and 103: 102 LUCR.( ST., I.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 104 and 105: Analiza unui sistem cauzal care a d
Page 106 and 107: 106 LUCR.{ ST., LC.C.S.; CARTOFUL,
Page 108 and 109: Analiza unui sistem cauzal care a d
Page 110 and 111: 110 LUCR.( ST., l.C.C.S.; CARTOFUL,
Page 112 and 113: 112 LUCR.,' ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 114 and 115: Analiza unui sistem cauzat care a d
Page 116 and 117: 116, LUCR.( ST., I.C.C.S., CARTOFUL
Page 118 and 119: 118 LUCR. CST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 120 and 121: 120 ~ LUCR.' ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL
Page 122 and 123: 122 LUCR. (ST.,I.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 124 and 125: 124 LUCR.\ ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 126 and 127: '.126 LUCR! (ST;. 'I.c.c.s:, 'CARTO
Page 128 and 129: 128 W. COPONY şi GH. PAMFIL, îngr
Page 130 and 131: 130 w. COPONY şi GH. PAMFIL, îngr
Page 132 and 133: 132 W. COPONY şi M. TOFAN, Metoda
Page 134 and 135: 1.34 \v. COPONY şi M. TOFAN, Metod
Page 140 and 141:
140 W. COPONY şi M. TOFAN, Metoda
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
144 W. COPONY şi M. TOFAN. Metoda
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
152 DRAGA SCHĂCHTER şi calab., In
Page 154 and 155:
154 DRAGA SCHĂCHTER şi colab., In
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
162 V. VELICAN şi colab., Stabilir
Page 164 and 165:
164 V. VELICAN şi colab., Stabilir
Page 166 and 167:
166 V. VEUCAN şi colab., Stabilire
Page 168 and 169:
168 L. REICHBUCH şi colab., Efectu
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Fig. 11 Efectul cumulat al îngră
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
198 P. ZAHAN şi colab., Aplicarea
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
202 ~//)a P. ZAHAN şi c01ab., Apli
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
t>..:l o ce #:t) A 42V OL5%- 41'l/h
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
214 1. MĂzAREANU şi colab., Influ
Page 216 and 217:
216 1. MĂZAREANU şi colab., Influ
Page 218 and 219:
218 fokJflile 8/A.50V I. MĂZAREANU
Page 220 and 221:
191.:' /. NEJN(f2A~A" .2 N 110 P'5
Page 222 and 223:
972 P P CJ Spo/'vl ehi d@prqoo/'fig
Page 224 and 225:
,.....,--."~~ '-~I'~Q"\ 224 1. MĂZ
Page 226 and 227:
226 1. l\1ĂZAREANU şi colab., Inf
Page 228 and 229:
228 RaDreA P~TINEANU şi GH. Ş1PO
Page 230 and 231:
~ w o r--1 ~ ~ţi> ~ :: II- • ,-
Page 232 and 233:
232 RODICA pALTINEANU şi GH. ŞIPO
Page 234 and 235:
~ Eimm/zl - VI r '10 °0 o, L ,'.,0
Page 236 and 237:
Lucr. ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 238 and 239:
Lucr. ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975
Page 240 and 241:
Lucr. ST., I.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Ll,tGl;:. ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL,
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Lucr. ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975.
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Lucr. ST" I.C.C.S.; CARTOFUL, 19,'Z
Page 256 and 257:
Lucr. ST., I~C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975
Page 258 and 259:
Lucr. ST., T.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
5,8 Tabelul 1 Eficacitatea erbicide
Page 266 and 267:
Tabelul 2 Eficacitatea erbicidelor
Page 268 and 269:
Eficacitatea erbicidelor în combat
Page 270 and 271:
Tabelul 6 Eficacitatea erbieidelor
Page 272 and 273:
Lucr. ST., LC.C.S., C,ARTOFUL, 1975
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Lucr~ ST., 1.
Page 278 and 279:
Lltcr. ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 197
Page 280 and 281:
Lucr. ST.. I.C.C.S., CART0FUL; 1975
Page 282 and 283:
LUCR. ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975
Page 284 and 285:
Influenţa tratamenteIor asupra pro
Page 286 and 287:
LUCR. ST., I.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975
Page 288 and 289:
LUCR, ST.;I.C.C.S.,.CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 290 and 291:
LUCR. ST., T.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
LVCR. ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 298 and 299:
LUCR. ST., T.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1973
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
LUCR. ST., l.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
LUCR. ST., I.C.C.S., CARTOFUL, 1975
Page 314 and 315:
LUCR. ST., LC.C.S. CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
:l.UCR. ST., LC.C.S., CARTOFUL, 197
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
LUCR. ST., LC.C.S. CAHTOFUL, 1975,
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Testarea din 1970 din 1971 Tabelul
Page 334 and 335:
- Distribuţia pe serii taxonomice
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
LUCR. ST., T.C.C.S. CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
LUCR. ST., l.C.C.S. CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 346 and 347:
LUCR. ST., I.C.C.S. CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
LUCR. ST., J.C.C.S. CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 354 and 355:
1.,UCR. ST., I.C.C.S. CARTOFUL, 197
Page 356 and 357:
L,UCR, ST., LC.C.S. CARTOFUL, 1975,
Page 358 and 359:
LUCR. ST., LC.C.S. CARTOFUL, 1975.
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
LUCR. ST., r.C.c.s. CARTOFUL" 1975,
Page 364 and 365:
LUCR. ST., LC.C.S. CARTOFUL, 19'75,
Page 367:
Redacţia şi administraţia: Str.
show all

anale 5.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?