14.11.2014 Views

Descarcă revista în format PDF - idea

Descarcă revista în format PDF - idea

Descarcă revista în format PDF - idea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Óscar Muñoz<br />

Proyecto para un Memorial, 2003–2005, five channel video-projections, 7’ loop, without sound,<br />

courtesy: Galería Alcuadrado, Bogotá, Colombia<br />

Jenny Holzer<br />

Left Handprint, 2007, oil on linen, courtesy: the artist<br />

which are all names of the feminine genitalia. Lux, calme et volupté.<br />

Which is not to say there are not also other kind of works in the biennial,<br />

more subtle and profound, such as Jenny Holzer’s silkscreen<br />

paintings which are based on classified military documents from the<br />

Iraq war and Guantanamo Bay prison. It is not just the change of<br />

perspective to the unofficial history that make these works thoughtful,<br />

but the way of daring to show real death without turning it into<br />

a metaphor. Death in the present tense (if we want to give to Storr<br />

what’s his), such as is also the one depicted in Óscar Muñoz’ portraits<br />

of people disappeared by the political regime in his country,<br />

Columbia, but in so many other places around the world. Portraits<br />

which are drawn with water on the concrete sidewalk, and drying up<br />

in the sun before being finished.<br />

In the end there was no escape, everybody fell into the meditationupon-death<br />

mood, even Sophie Calle realized a new work about her<br />

mother who found out she was to die soon just when the artist was<br />

invited to participate in the biennial. Luckily, there were also the<br />

national pavilions. Where the same Sophie Calle, representing<br />

France, made a beautifully installed, painfully theatrical set up<br />

around a letter of separation received from her ex-partner, and<br />

which she gave for analysis and interpretation to 107 women with<br />

different professions and hobbies. A clever way for public revenge,<br />

presented with the help of Calle’s hired curator Daniel Buren, who<br />

redesigned in an all too sophisticated way the pavilion and added to<br />

it his own reinterpretation, a colorful miniature pavilion, La Tonnelle,<br />

placed in a park in the Giardini.<br />

To come back and conclude on Robert Storr’s exhibition, what was<br />

probably most exasperating about it was the lack of any sense of<br />

humour, or self-irony. Even Dan Perjovschi, whose work accustomed<br />

us with spaces of passage between the real world and the art world,<br />

who is used with making witty introductions for exhibitions or connections<br />

between works, looked too institutional in the Italia pavilion,<br />

in a little dark corridor, which was leading one from the<br />

dramatic cut-out heads of Nancy Spero to the stones following a<br />

magnetic needle, of Giovanni Anselmo. Whereas in the Arsenale Dan<br />

Perjovschi looked outside of the biennial, which he literally was, as<br />

he covered with drawings the walls in the free-access area at the<br />

entrance. Maybe he should have put a warning in this work – don’t<br />

go inside unless you’re really excited about life and want to chill<br />

down a little bit... His presence in both the displays might have come<br />

from Storr’s stressing of the <strong>idea</strong> of the artist in the present tense,<br />

who can be at the same time established and emerging (i.e. contemporary).<br />

Or dead and still in the present tense, like Félix Gonzalez-<br />

Torrès, whose work was featured both in Storr’s Italia pavilion and<br />

in the US pavilion, with very little to say in both contexts, deprived<br />

of its intimacy and delicacy.<br />

Robert Storr declared himself skeptical on the <strong>idea</strong> of national representation,<br />

unless the artists take nationality as their subject of interest.<br />

However, the number of requests for – more or less national –<br />

pavilions increases with each edition, and I tend to interpret this as<br />

a need for self-representation rather than a belief in national values.<br />

The national pavilions might express a mirror image of society, if one<br />

thinks only of the attention paid to the triumvirate of Germany,<br />

Britain and France, or of the dependence of artists on the political<br />

regimes or politicized institutions which commission them. But isn’t<br />

it more interesting to find all these reflected games, narrowed down<br />

to a scale which makes them more understandable and acceptable<br />

(or not), than the didactic global scouting of an internationally<br />

famous curator with a too heavy (Western) art historical baggage?<br />

Of course, the national pavilions are each country’s business and<br />

therefore the art presented there ranges from extremely fresh to<br />

endless displays of Artists’ Union like paintings, watercolors or sculptures.<br />

Sometimes, the stories behind the curtains are more interesting<br />

than the final result presented to the public – as it happened this<br />

year with Croatia’s de-commissioning David Maljkovic’ and replacing<br />

him with a light-op artist, Ivana Franke. At every edition there is<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!