Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Óscar Muñoz<br />
Proyecto para un Memorial, 2003–2005, five channel video-projections, 7’ loop, without sound,<br />
courtesy: Galería Alcuadrado, Bogotá, Colombia<br />
Jenny Holzer<br />
Left Handprint, 2007, oil on linen, courtesy: the artist<br />
which are all names of the feminine genitalia. Lux, calme et volupté.<br />
Which is not to say there are not also other kind of works in the biennial,<br />
more subtle and profound, such as Jenny Holzer’s silkscreen<br />
paintings which are based on classified military documents from the<br />
Iraq war and Guantanamo Bay prison. It is not just the change of<br />
perspective to the unofficial history that make these works thoughtful,<br />
but the way of daring to show real death without turning it into<br />
a metaphor. Death in the present tense (if we want to give to Storr<br />
what’s his), such as is also the one depicted in Óscar Muñoz’ portraits<br />
of people disappeared by the political regime in his country,<br />
Columbia, but in so many other places around the world. Portraits<br />
which are drawn with water on the concrete sidewalk, and drying up<br />
in the sun before being finished.<br />
In the end there was no escape, everybody fell into the meditationupon-death<br />
mood, even Sophie Calle realized a new work about her<br />
mother who found out she was to die soon just when the artist was<br />
invited to participate in the biennial. Luckily, there were also the<br />
national pavilions. Where the same Sophie Calle, representing<br />
France, made a beautifully installed, painfully theatrical set up<br />
around a letter of separation received from her ex-partner, and<br />
which she gave for analysis and interpretation to 107 women with<br />
different professions and hobbies. A clever way for public revenge,<br />
presented with the help of Calle’s hired curator Daniel Buren, who<br />
redesigned in an all too sophisticated way the pavilion and added to<br />
it his own reinterpretation, a colorful miniature pavilion, La Tonnelle,<br />
placed in a park in the Giardini.<br />
To come back and conclude on Robert Storr’s exhibition, what was<br />
probably most exasperating about it was the lack of any sense of<br />
humour, or self-irony. Even Dan Perjovschi, whose work accustomed<br />
us with spaces of passage between the real world and the art world,<br />
who is used with making witty introductions for exhibitions or connections<br />
between works, looked too institutional in the Italia pavilion,<br />
in a little dark corridor, which was leading one from the<br />
dramatic cut-out heads of Nancy Spero to the stones following a<br />
magnetic needle, of Giovanni Anselmo. Whereas in the Arsenale Dan<br />
Perjovschi looked outside of the biennial, which he literally was, as<br />
he covered with drawings the walls in the free-access area at the<br />
entrance. Maybe he should have put a warning in this work – don’t<br />
go inside unless you’re really excited about life and want to chill<br />
down a little bit... His presence in both the displays might have come<br />
from Storr’s stressing of the <strong>idea</strong> of the artist in the present tense,<br />
who can be at the same time established and emerging (i.e. contemporary).<br />
Or dead and still in the present tense, like Félix Gonzalez-<br />
Torrès, whose work was featured both in Storr’s Italia pavilion and<br />
in the US pavilion, with very little to say in both contexts, deprived<br />
of its intimacy and delicacy.<br />
Robert Storr declared himself skeptical on the <strong>idea</strong> of national representation,<br />
unless the artists take nationality as their subject of interest.<br />
However, the number of requests for – more or less national –<br />
pavilions increases with each edition, and I tend to interpret this as<br />
a need for self-representation rather than a belief in national values.<br />
The national pavilions might express a mirror image of society, if one<br />
thinks only of the attention paid to the triumvirate of Germany,<br />
Britain and France, or of the dependence of artists on the political<br />
regimes or politicized institutions which commission them. But isn’t<br />
it more interesting to find all these reflected games, narrowed down<br />
to a scale which makes them more understandable and acceptable<br />
(or not), than the didactic global scouting of an internationally<br />
famous curator with a too heavy (Western) art historical baggage?<br />
Of course, the national pavilions are each country’s business and<br />
therefore the art presented there ranges from extremely fresh to<br />
endless displays of Artists’ Union like paintings, watercolors or sculptures.<br />
Sometimes, the stories behind the curtains are more interesting<br />
than the final result presented to the public – as it happened this<br />
year with Croatia’s de-commissioning David Maljkovic’ and replacing<br />
him with a light-op artist, Ivana Franke. At every edition there is<br />
70