PDF (10 MB) - Jurnalul de Chirurgie
PDF (10 MB) - Jurnalul de Chirurgie
PDF (10 MB) - Jurnalul de Chirurgie
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Articole originale <strong>Jurnalul</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Chirurgie</strong>, Iaşi, 2011, Vol. 7, Nr. 3 [ISSN 1584 – 9341]<br />
CONCLUZII<br />
Introducerea în practică a evaluării limfoganglionului santinelă a <strong>de</strong>terminat<br />
scă<strong>de</strong>rea frecvenţei disecţiei axilare în cazul pacientelor cu tumori în stadiile I şi II,<br />
pentru care chirurgia conservatoare este la fel <strong>de</strong> eficientă ca mastectomia, fiind<br />
preferabilă acesteia <strong>de</strong>oarece este mai puţin mutilantă.<br />
BIBLIOGRAFIE<br />
1. Pricop M. <strong>Chirurgie</strong> ginecologică. Puncte <strong>de</strong> ve<strong>de</strong>re. Institutul European, 2006.<br />
2. Ivens D, Hoe A L, Podd TJ et al. Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary no<strong>de</strong>s<br />
dissection. Br J Cancer 1992; 66(1): 136-138.<br />
3. Petrek JA, Pressman PI, Smith RA. Lymphe<strong>de</strong>ma: current issues in research and management.<br />
CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50(5): 292-307.<br />
4. Cabañas R. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 1977; 39(2): 456-466.<br />
5. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH et al. Technical <strong>de</strong>tails of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for<br />
early melanoma. Arch Surg 1992; 127(4): 392-399.<br />
6. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the<br />
sentinel lymph no<strong>de</strong> in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993; 2(6): 335-339.<br />
7. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lympha<strong>de</strong>nectomy for<br />
breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220(3): 391-401.<br />
8. Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel no<strong>de</strong> biopsy in the patient<br />
with breast cancer. JAMA 1996; 276(22): 1818-1822.<br />
9. Boolbol SK, Borgen PI. Sentinel lymph no<strong>de</strong> biopsy: an American perspective. Breast 2001;<br />
<strong>10</strong>(4): 287-290.<br />
<strong>10</strong>. Borgstein PJ, Meijer S, Pijpers R. Intra<strong>de</strong>rmal blue dye to i<strong>de</strong>ntify sentinel lymph no<strong>de</strong> in breast<br />
cancer. Lancet 1997; 349(9066): 1668-1669.<br />
11. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V et al. Sentinel no<strong>de</strong> biopsy to avoid axillary no<strong>de</strong><br />
dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph no<strong>de</strong>s. Lancet 1997; 349(9069):<br />
1864-1867.<br />
12. Treseler PA, Tauchi PS. Pathologic analysis of the sentinel no<strong>de</strong>. Surg Clin N Am 2000; 80(6):<br />
1695-1719.<br />
13. Van <strong>de</strong>r Ent FW, Kengen RA, van <strong>de</strong>r Pol HA et al. Halsted revisited: Internal mammary<br />
sentinel lymph no<strong>de</strong> biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg 2001; 234(1): 79-84.<br />
14. Chua B, Ung O, Taylor et al. Treatment implications of a positive sentinel no<strong>de</strong> biopsy for<br />
patient with early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 2001; 92(7): 1769-1774.<br />
15. Gemigani ML, Borgen PI. Is there a role for selective axillary dissections in breast cancer?<br />
World J Surg 2001; 25(6): 809-818.<br />
16. Wong SL, Edwards MS, Chao C et al. Sentinel lymph no<strong>de</strong> biopsy for breast cancer: impact of<br />
number of sentinel lymph no<strong>de</strong>s removed on false negative rate. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192(6):<br />
684-691.<br />
17. Cody HS 3 rd , Borgen PI. State-of-the-art approaches to sentinel no<strong>de</strong> biopsy for breast cancer:<br />
study <strong>de</strong>sign, patient selection, technique, and quality control at Memorial Sloan-Kettering<br />
Cancer Center. Surg Oncol 1999; 8(2): 85-91.<br />
18. Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lympha<strong>de</strong>nectomy in breast cancer. J<br />
Clin Oncol 1997; 15(6): 2345-2350.<br />
19. Nahrig J, Richter T, Kowolik J et al. Comparison of different histopathological methods for the<br />
examination of sentinel lymph no<strong>de</strong>s in breast cancer. Anticancer 2000; 20(3B): 2209-2212.<br />
20. Moore KH, Thaler HT, Tan LK et al. Immunohistochemically <strong>de</strong>tected tumor cells in the<br />
sentinel lymph no<strong>de</strong>s of patients with breast carcinoma. Biologic metastasis or procedural<br />
artifact? Cancer 2004; <strong>10</strong>0(5): 929-934.<br />
21. Carter BA, Jensen RA, Simpson JF et al. Benign transport of breast epithelium into axillary<br />
lymph no<strong>de</strong>s after biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 113(2): 259-265.<br />
22. Cox CE, Yeatman T, Salud CJ, Bass SS. Significance of sentinel no<strong>de</strong> micrometastasis. Cancer<br />
Control 1999; 6(6): 601-605.<br />
23. Fisher B. Lumpectomy versus quadrantectomy for breast conservation: a critical appraisal. Eur J<br />
Canc 1995; 31A(<strong>10</strong>): 1567-1569.<br />
373