26.10.2014 Views

Nr. 2 (19) anul VI / aprilie-iunie 2008 - ROMDIDAC

Nr. 2 (19) anul VI / aprilie-iunie 2008 - ROMDIDAC

Nr. 2 (19) anul VI / aprilie-iunie 2008 - ROMDIDAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of resistance against the system. The consumption of such works substituted<br />

for real protest.<br />

The following caricatures present the quality that the communist system<br />

feared most: the successful combination of wit, innocence, and authentic<br />

laughter in the face of the even tragic situation. The wit is circumstantial<br />

and dated; once it is explained, it rewards the<br />

reader/viewer. In Suicide Line, Stanescu targets<br />

the Romanians’ obedience and the system’s<br />

deliberate suppression of joy by forcing people<br />

to live at the level of immediate necessity with no<br />

reason for living like soulless tools.<br />

On the other hand, he laughs at the so-called<br />

volunteer activities and at the necessity to stand<br />

in line for the most necessary items for survival.<br />

Volunteering and standing in line to commit suicide<br />

is so tragic in its meaninglessness that it becomes<br />

ridiculous when the character asks others to save<br />

her place in the other line not to take a chance on<br />

missing an opportunity!? Standing in line used to<br />

be the only way of getting things which<br />

were not rationed. What should have<br />

been the ultimate form of opposing<br />

the system becomes another way of<br />

playing by its rules. The one in which<br />

the danger sign has a schedule refers<br />

to the controlled blackouts which<br />

were frequent during that period.<br />

Again, even danger was something<br />

which people cannot take seriously<br />

and it thus becomes laughable.<br />

The theme of shortage is also<br />

explored in the caricature of the<br />

writers’ strike. The writers finally admitted that they had complaints but lacked<br />

the basic means with which to write them down. The scarcity of “materials” is<br />

also an implication of the further lack of subjects about which to write. Stanescu<br />

seems to ask the rhetorical question “what is the limit of the Romanians<br />

endurance” again and again. In comparing two<br />

parties, one from <strong>19</strong>79 and one from <strong>19</strong>89 he<br />

documented the degradation of intellectual life<br />

as a consequence of continuous worries about<br />

immediate needs.<br />

Ex Ponto nr.2, <strong>2008</strong><br />

166<br />

Stanescu’s caricatures present “the comic<br />

history of a tragedy” which “helped Romanians<br />

survive while in the middle of disaster,” as Andrei<br />

Plesu described Stanescu’s work. After <strong>19</strong>89<br />

when Romanians had a better idea about how<br />

the Secret Police worked, they understood that<br />

such mass phenomenon as the circulation of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!