Mentenanta Conductelor de Transport Gaze Naturale - Transgaz

123. Pussegoda N., ş.a., An interim approach to determine dynamic ductile
fracture resistance of modern high toughness pipeline steels, 2000
International Pipeline Conference – ASME 2000 / Canada, vol.1, p.239-245
124. Rinehart A.J., Effects Of Localized Geometric Imperfections On The Stress
Behavior Of Pressurized Cylindrical Shells, Dissertation, August 2003
125. Rinehart, A.J. and Keating, P.B., 2002, Rebound Behavior of Dents in
Petroleum Pipelines, Proc., Texas Section ASCE Spring Meeting, San
Antonio, TX. ASCE, p. 195–204
126. Roos Race Julia, Determining Corrosion Growth Rates Using Inspection Data,
―Innovations In Pipeline Inspection Technology‖ Budapest, 2-4 June 2004
127. Roos E., Component tests and the R curve approach for through cracks, The
Assessment of cracked components by fracture mechanics, EGF4,
Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, 1989, p. 161-210
128. Roovers P., Bood R., Galli M., Marewski U., Steiner M., Zare´a M., EPRG
methods for assessing the tolerance and resistance of pipelines to external
damage. In: Denys R, editor. Pipeline technology Proceedings of the third
international pipeline technology conference, Brugge, Belgium, vol. II.
Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. p. 405–425
129. Rosenfeld M.J., Investigations of Dent Rerounding Behaviour, Volume 1,
Proceedings of Second International Pipeline Conference, IPC-98, Calgary,
Canada, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1998, pp. 299-307
130. Rosenfeld M.J., Procedure improves line pipe Charpy test interpretation, Oil
&Gas Journal, Apr. 14, 1997, p. 40-46
131. Rothwell A.B., The application of the Battelle ―short formula‖ to the
determination of ductile fracture arrest toughness in gas pipelines, 2000
International Pipeline Conference – ASME 2000 / Canada, vol.1, p.233-238
132. Rothwell B., History and operating experience of design factors above 0,72 in
canadian gas transmission pipelines, PHMSA Public Meeting on
Reconsideration of Natural Gas Pipeline Maximum Allowable Operating
Pressure for Class Locations, Reston, march 2006
133. Sandvik A., Řstby E., Thaulow C., Probabilistic fracture assessment of
surface cracked pipes using strain-based approach, Engineering Fracture
Mechanics 73 (2006) 1491–1509
134. Saxena S., Ramachandra Murthy D.S., Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics
based prediction of crack initiation load in through-wall cracked pipes,
Engineering Structures 26 (2004) 1165–1172
135. Semenescu G., Coroziunea localizată în mediu clorurat. Morfologia ciupiturilor
şi factorilor care o determină, Revista de Chimie, nr. 9 – 1983, p. 832-840
136. Shivei W.G., ş.a., Advanced 100% solid rigid polyurethane coatings
technology for pipeline field joints and rehabilitation, Corrosion NACEexp,
Paper no. 03043, 2003
137. Smardzic I., Siewert T., Reliability improvments in repair welding of high –
strength steels. Doc. IIS/IIW IX – 2002 – 01
138. Spiekhout J., Gresnigt A.M., Koning C., Wildschut H.; Calculation Models
for the Evaluation of the Resistance against Mechanical Damage of Pipelines,
NTMC ___________________________________________________________________________ pag. 152