Mentenanta Conductelor de Transport Gaze Naturale - Transgaz

Pipeline Research Council International, Catalog no. L52047, august 2006
70. Jayadevana K.R., Østbyb E., Thaulow C., Fracture response of pipelines
subjected to large plastic deformation under tension, International Journal of
Pressure Vessels and Piping 81 (2004) 771–783
71. Jones D.G.; The Significance of Mechanical Damage in Pipelines, 3R
International, 21, Jahrgang, Heft, 7, July 1982
72. Kalna K., ş.a., Heat and mechanical treatment of welded joints, Doc. IIW X
– 1252 – 92
73. Kelly J.S. ş.a., ASTM Standards for preservation and rehabilitation, Chemical
Process Industry, 1996
74. Kiefner, J.F., Pressure management key to problematic ERW pipe, Oil &
Gas Journal, AugMar., 17, 1992, p. 80-81
75. Kiefner E.J., Installed pipe, especially pre-1970, plaggued by problems, in Oil
&Gas Journal, Aug.,10, 1992. p. 45-51
76. Kiefner J.F., Alexander C.R., Fowler J.R., Repair of Dents Containing Minor
Scratches, Paper 9, 9th Symposium on Line Pipe Research, Pipeline Research
Comittee of the American Gas Association, Houston, Texas, 1996
77. Kim J. W., Park C. Y., Experimental investigation of the failure behavior of
notched wall-thinned pipes, Nuclear Engineering and Design 236 (2006)
1838–1846
78. Komizo Y., Fukada Y., Weldability of large diameter grade X-80 and X-100
line pipe, Doc. IIW IX – 1520 – 88
79. Kuprewicz B. Observations on the Application of Smart Pigging on
Transmission Pipelines, A Focus on OPS’s Inline Inspection Public Meeting
of 8/11/2005
80. Laţa I., Cercetări privind stabilirea capacităţii portante reziduale şi întocmirea
programelor de mentenanţă pentru conductele de transport al gazelor
naturale, Teză de doctorat, Universitatea Petrol – Gaze din Ploieşti, 2006
81. Leclercq G., Marandet B., Sanz G., Evaluation de la ténacité des materiaux au
moyen de l’integrale J, C.I.T., nr.2, 1976, p.387-417 3
82. Leis N.B., Eiber J.R., Fracture propagation control in onshore transmission
pipelines, Onshore Pipeline Technology Conference, Istanbul, December
1998, p. 2.1-2.35
83. Leis N.B., Characterizing dynamic crack – resistance of pipelines using
laboratory – scale practices, 2000 International Pipeline Conference – ASME
2000 / Canada, vol.1, p.295-305
84. Lewis, B. E., R. L. Glassell, and S. M. Babcock, Tank isolation deployment
plans and issues, Oak Ridge, Tenn. Oak Ridge National Laboratory1998
85. Liu J.H., Francis A., Theoretical analysis of local indentation on pressured
pipes, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 81 (2004) 931–939
86. Macdonald K.A., Cosham A., Best practice for the assessment of defects in
pipelines – gouges and dents, Engineering Failure Analysis 12 (2005) 720–745
87. Martinez L.J., Rodriguez E., Developing tolerable risk criteria for gas
transmission pipelines, 2000 International Pipeline Conference – ASME
2000 / Canada, vol.1, p. 63-69
NTMC ___________________________________________________________________________ pag. 149