fazele, elementele structurale, dimensiunile, paradoxurile, eşecurile ...
fazele, elementele structurale, dimensiunile, paradoxurile, eşecurile ... fazele, elementele structurale, dimensiunile, paradoxurile, eşecurile ...
Европы. В: Наука и инновации, 2006, nr. 7, p. 25-29. 331. Розов, Н.С. Ценности в проблемном мире: философские основания и социальные приложения конструктивной аксиологии. Новосибирск: Изд-во Новосибирского ун-та, 1998. 332. Российская социологическая энциклопедия. Москва: Изд-во Инфра-М, Норма, 1998. 333. Рукавишников, В.О. Посткоммунистическая модернизация России. B: Соединяя капитализм, социализм и демократию. Практическая политика в России и США / Под ред. В.Рукавишникова и С.Нагеля. Москва: Летний Сад, 1999, p. 127 -206. 334. Рывкина, Р. Постсоветское государство как генератор конфликтов. B: Социoлoгические исcледования, 1999, nr. 5, p.12-19. 335. Рывкина, Р. Драма реформ. Москва: Дело, 2001. 336. Сорочан, О. Социально-экономические трансформации: специфика пост- социализма. Кишинэу, 2002. 337. Caка, В. Посткоммунистическая системная трансформация между властными и оппозиционными интересами: молдавский вариант. В: MOLDOSCOPIE (Probleme de analiză politică), nr. 1. (XXVIII), 2005. Chişinău, 2005, p. 109-128. 338. Тарасов, И.Н. Политические институты и практики посткоммунизма в Центрально-Восточной Европе. Саратов: Издат. центр СГСЭУ, 2009. 339. Федотова, В. Г. Неклассические модернизации и альтернативы модернизационной теории. В: Вопр. философии, 2002, nr. 12, p. 3-21. 340. Фисун А.А. Демократия, неопатримониализм и глобальные трансформации: Монография. Харьков: Константа, 2006. 341. Шиллер, Г. Манипуляторы сознанием. Москва: Изд-во Мысль, 1980. 342. Шмиттер, Ф. Процесс демократического транзита и консолидации демократии. B: ПОЛИС, 1999, nr. 3, p. 30-33. 343. Шпедер, Ж.; Элекеш, Ж. Очерк трансформации в Венгрии. B: Социологические ис- следования, 2002, nr. 5. 344. Штомпка, П. Социальное изменение как травма. B: Социологические исследования, 2001, nr. 1. 345. Штомпка, П. Культурная травма в посткоммунистическом обществе (статья вторая). B: Социологические исследования, 2001, nr. 2, p. 3-12. 346. Юшкевич, А. В. Транзитология: предмет, цели, задачи. В: Свободная мысль, 2007, nr 6, p. 190-199. 347. Ядов В. А. Теоретико-концептуальные объяснения „посткоммунистических” трансформаций. В: Россия реформирующаяся. Ежегодник /Отв. ред. М.К. Горшков. Вып.6. Москва: Институт социологии РАН, 2007, вып. 6.
R E S U M E Moldovan Transition: phases, structural elements, dimensions, paradoxes, failures and lessons learnt This monograph presents the whole range of aspects of Moldova’s transition, including its phases, structural elements, dimensions, paradoxes, failures and main lessons learned. It is based on a philosophical, interdisciplinary and global approach of studying the social changes and transformations (including behavioral, changes in mentality and social values, among others), that have occurred and still continue to occur in Moldova. These changes and transformations are aimed at making a transition from the totalitarian society towards democracy, and from a central and planned economy towards that of a market. The theoretical foundation of this study is based on a systemic analysis and epistemological approaches of transition’s multidimentionality, providing options for solutions to the identified problems. The monograph is designed to have an appeal to a broad range of specialists: philosophers, sociologists, politologists, students and professors from relevant disciplines. Furthermore, this monograph can also be useful to other readers, in particular, to those who study various issues and perspectives associated with the native transition, current situation and the evolution of the Republic of Moldova. Foreword Contents
- Page 117 and 118: unde a dominat întîmplarea şi nu
- Page 119 and 120: pensionarii, agricultorii şi perso
- Page 121 and 122: acestea, la rîndul lor, produc dis
- Page 123 and 124: calomniate, negate şi deformate î
- Page 125 and 126: 8. Paradoxul poziţionării noilor
- Page 127 and 128: Capitolul V. Unele consecinţe ale
- Page 129 and 130: Interesul faţă de problema confli
- Page 131 and 132: destinului acestei generaţii atomi
- Page 133 and 134: culturală, capacitate pentru organ
- Page 135 and 136: sale. Sîntem de acord cu faptul c
- Page 137 and 138: devin punţi de legătură între m
- Page 139 and 140: Anume totalitatea valorilor, orient
- Page 141 and 142: ezervat politicului. Singurul crite
- Page 143 and 144: marja de decizie ce ne-a fost oferi
- Page 145 and 146: despre locul pe care îl ocupă ţa
- Page 147 and 148: comerciale, fapt care a dus la spor
- Page 149 and 150: chestiunea identitară şi secesiun
- Page 151 and 152: B I B L I O G R A F I E 1. Constitu
- Page 153 and 154: tranziţie. În: Tezele Conferinţe
- Page 155 and 156: 73. Cimpoeşu, D. Republica Moldova
- Page 157 and 158: 116. Florian, A. Modele ale tranzi
- Page 159 and 160: Ed. Ştiinţifică, 1972. 162. Karl
- Page 161 and 162: 1970. 200. Offe, C. The Varieties o
- Page 163 and 164: 236. Roşca, Al. Algoritmi ai tranz
- Page 165 and 166: Ceauşescu. Bucureşti: Ed. Cartea
- Page 167: 315. Капустин, Б.Г. Ко
- Page 171 and 172: Р Е З Ю М Е Молдавск
- Page 173 and 174: Valeriu Capcelea, doctor habilitat
R E S U M E<br />
Moldovan Transition:<br />
phases, structural elements, dimensions, paradoxes, failures and lessons learnt<br />
This monograph presents the whole range of aspects of Moldova’s transition, including<br />
its phases, structural elements, dimensions, paradoxes, failures and main lessons learned. It is<br />
based on a philosophical, interdisciplinary and global approach of studying the social changes<br />
and transformations (including behavioral, changes in mentality and social values, among<br />
others), that have occurred and still continue to occur in Moldova. These changes and<br />
transformations are aimed at making a transition from the totalitarian society towards<br />
democracy, and from a central and planned economy towards that of a market. The theoretical<br />
foundation of this study is based on a systemic analysis and epistemological approaches of<br />
transition’s multidimentionality, providing options for solutions to the identified problems.<br />
The monograph is designed to have an appeal to a broad range of specialists:<br />
philosophers, sociologists, politologists, students and professors from relevant disciplines.<br />
Furthermore, this monograph can also be useful to other readers, in particular, to those who<br />
study various issues and perspectives associated with the native transition, current situation and<br />
the evolution of the Republic of Moldova.<br />
Foreword<br />
Contents