Monsour, M., Betty, S. si Kurzweil, N. (1993), ..Levels of perspectives and the perception of intimacy in crosssex friendships: A balance theory explanation of shared perceptual reality", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 529-550. Montgomery, B.M. (1984), ..Behavioral characteristics predicting self and peer perception of open communication", Communication Quarterly, 32, 233-240. 204 BIBLIOGRAFIE Montgomery, B.M. (1986, July), Flirtatious messages, Paper presented to the Third International Conference of Personal Relationships, Herzlia, Israel. Montgomery, B.M. (1988), ..Quality communication in personal relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong>, D.F. Hay, S.E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes §i B. Montgomery (eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 343- 362), New York si Chichester, John Wiley. Murstein, B.I. (1971), „ Critique of mo<strong>de</strong>ls of dyadic attraction", in B.I. Murstein (ed.), Theories of attraction and love (pp. 1-30), New York, Springer. Neimeyer, R.A. §i Mitchell, K.A. (1988), ^Similarity and attraction: A longitudinal study", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 131-148. Neimeyer, R.A. §i Neimeyer, G.J. (1985), ..Relational trajectories: A personal construct contribution", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 250-325. Newcomb, T.M. (1971), „ Dyadic balance as a source of clues about interpersonal attraction", in B.I. Murstein (ed.), Theories of attraction and love (pp. 31-45), New York, Springer. Niven, D. (1974), Bring on the empty horses. New York, Fontana. Noller, P. ji Fitzpatrick, M.A. (1990), ..Marital communication in the eighties", Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 832-843. Noller, P. $i Guthrie, D. (1992), „ Study ing communication in marriage: An integration and critical evaluation", in W.H. Jones §i D Perlman (eds.), Advances in personal relationships (vol. 3, pp. 37-74), London, Jessica Kingsley. Noller, P. $i Venardos, C. (1986), „Communication awareness in married couples", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 31-42. Norton, R.W. (1983), Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage. O'Keefe, B. §i Delia, J. (1982), mlmpression formation and message production", in M.E. Roloff $i C.R. Berger (eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 121-146), Beverly Hills, CA, Sage. Olson, D.H. (1977), „Insi<strong>de</strong>rs' and outsi<strong>de</strong>rs' views of relationships: Research studies", in G. Levinger §i H. Raush (eds.), Close relationships: Perspectives on the meaning of intimacy (pp. 115-135), Amherst, University of Massachusetts Press. Owen, W.F. (1984), ..Interpretive themes in relational communication", Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274-287. Owen, W.F. (1985), ..Thematic metaphors in relational communication: A conceptual framework", Western Journal of Speech Communication, 49, 1-13. Owen, W.F. (1993), „Metaphors in accounts of romantic relationship terminations", in P. Kalbfleisch (ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving perspectives (pp. 261-278), Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum. BIBLIOGRAFIE 205 Percy, W. (1975), The message in the bottle, New York, Farrar, Straus si Giroux. Philipsen, G. (1987), ,,The prospect for cultural communication", in D. Kincaid (ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 245-254), New York, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Planalp, S. (1993), ,,Friends' and acquaintances' conversations II: Co<strong>de</strong>d differences", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 483-506. Planalp, S. si Garvin-Doxas, K. (1994), ..Using mutual knowledge in conversation: Friends as experts in each other", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Dynamics of Interactions (Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding Relationships Processes Series, vol. 4, pp. 1-26), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. Planalp, S. s.i Honeycutt, J.M. (1985), ..Events that increase uncertainty in personal relationships", Human Communication Research, 11, 593-604. Potter, J. §i Wetherell, M. (1987), Discourse and social Psychology, London, Sage. Prins, K.S., Buunk, A.P. §i van Yperen, N.W. (1993), ,,Equity, normative disapproval and extramarital relationships", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 39-54. Prusank, D., Duran, R. §i DeLillo, D.A. (1993), ..Interpersonal relationships in women's magazines: Dating and relating in the 1970s and 1980s", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 307-320. Putalaz, M., Constanzo, P.R. §i Klein, T.T. (1993), ..Parental childhood social experiences and their effects on children's relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Learning about relationships (Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding Relationships Processes Series, vol. 2, pp. 63-97), Newbury Park, CA, Sage. Rawlins, W. (1992), Friendship matters, Hawthorne, NY, Aldine <strong>de</strong> Gruyter. Rawlins, W. §i Holl, M. (1988), ..Adolescents' interaction with parents and friends: Dialects of temporal perspective and evaluation", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 27-46.
Reis, H.T. 5! Shaver P.R. (1988), Jntimacy as an interpersonal process", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong>, D.F. Hay, S.E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes §i B.M. Montgomery (eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 377- 390), New York §i Chichester, John Wiley. Rodin, M. (1982), mNonengagement, failure to engage and disengagement", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Personal Relationships 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 31-50), London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Rosenbaum, M.E. (1986), ,,The repulsion hypothesis: On the non-<strong>de</strong>velopment of relationships", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1156-1166. Ross, L. (1977), ,,The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings : Distortions in the attribution process", in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 10, pp. 173-220), New York, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Rethman, E. (1984), Hands and hearts: A history of courtship in America, New York, Basic Books. 206 BIBLIOGRAFIE BIBLIOGRAFIE 207 Rusbult, C.E. §i Buunk, A.P. (1993), ^Commitment processes in close relationships: An inter<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce analysis", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175-203. Schonbach, P. (1992), ..Interaction of process and mo<strong>de</strong>rator variables in account episo<strong>de</strong>s", in J.H. Harvey, T.L. Orbuch §i A.L. Weber (eds.), Attributions, accounts and close relationships (pp. 40-51), New York, Springer. Schultz, A. (1973), A theory of consciousness, New York, Philosophical Library. Shoenewolf, G. (1991), The art of hating, New York, Random House. Shelter, J. (1987), ..The social construction of an «us» : problems of accountability and narratology", in R. Burnett, P. McGhee si D.D. Clarke (eds.), Accounting for relationships (pp. 225-247), London, Methuen. Shelter, J. (1992), ,,What is a «personal» reladonship ? A rhetorical-responsive accounl of «unfmished business»", in Attributions, accounts and close relationships (pp. 19-39), New York, Springer. Sillars, A.L. (1985), „Interpersonal perception in relationships", W. Ickes (ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 277-305), New York, Springer. Socha, T. (1991, May), Children's learning of compliance from their relationships with parents. Paper presented lo ihe third conference of ihe International Network on Personal Relationships, Normal, IL. Spencer, E.E. (1993, February), New approaches to assessing self-disclosure in conversation, Paper presented to the Western Speech Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM. Spencer, E.E. (1994), ..Transforming relationships through ordinary talk", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Dynamics of relationships (Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding Relationship Processes Series, vol. 4, pp. 58-86), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. Spitzberg, B.H. §i Cupach, W. (1985), Interpersonal communication competence, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage. Sprecher, S. (1987), ..The effecls of self-disclosure given and received on affection for an intimate partner and stability of the relationship", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 115-127. Sprecher, S. si <strong>Duck</strong>, S.W. (in press), ..Sweet lalk: The role of communication in consolidating relationship", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Stafford, L. §i Byers, C.L. (1993), Interaction between parents and children, Newbury Park, CA, Sage. Stein C.H. (1993), ,,Felt obligation in adull family relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Social contexts and relationships (Un<strong>de</strong>rslanding Relationship Processes Series, vol. 3, pp. 78-99), Newbury Park, CA, Sage. Stephen, T.D. (1985), „Fixed-sequence and circular-causal mo<strong>de</strong>ls of relationship <strong>de</strong>velopment: Divergent views on the role of communication in intimacy", Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 955-963. Stinson, L. §i Ickes, W. (1992), ..Empalhic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 787-797. Stromberg, P. (1985), ,,The impression point: Synthesis of symbol and self", Ethos, 13, 56-74. Sunnafrank, M. (1991), „Interpersonal attraction and altilu<strong>de</strong> similarity : A communication based assessment", in J.A. An<strong>de</strong>rson (ed.), Communication yearbook, 14 (pp. 451-483), Newbury Park, CA, Sage. Sunnafrank, M. (1992), ,,On <strong>de</strong>bunking the altilu<strong>de</strong> similarity myth", Communication Monographs, 59, 164-179. Surra, C.A. (1984, July), Attributions about the <strong>de</strong>cision to wed: Variations by style of courtship, Paper presented lo Ihe Second International Conference on Personal Relationships, Madison, WI. Surra, C.A. (1987), ^Reasons for changes in commilmenl: Variations by courtship style", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 17-33.
- Page 1 and 2:
Steve Duck RELATIILE INTERPERSONALE
- Page 3 and 4:
Gramatica motivaţiilor............
- Page 5 and 6:
Lucrarea pare, astfel, să aibă ca
- Page 7 and 8:
cercetătorilor, în primul rînd,
- Page 9 and 10:
sugerează că relaţiile se află
- Page 11 and 12:
Rutt, Hurst şi Strejc, 1991). Pe m
- Page 13 and 14:
oamenilor despre ele se schimbă -
- Page 15 and 16:
elaţionării dintre două „obiec
- Page 17 and 18:
care un intelect poate transforma s
- Page 19 and 20:
conferă o senzaţie de căldură),
- Page 21 and 22:
concentrat preponderent pe relatăr
- Page 23 and 24:
elaţională pe care observatorii
- Page 25 and 26:
continuu de experienţă năvalnic
- Page 27 and 28:
Problema segmentării este valabil
- Page 29 and 30:
Billig analizează, de asemenea, un
- Page 31 and 32:
perspectiva noilor evenimente. Astf
- Page 33 and 34:
mijloceşte posibilitatea iniţial
- Page 35 and 36:
(de exemplu, Berg şi McQuinn, 1986
- Page 37 and 38:
participarea la doxa culturală sau
- Page 39 and 40:
cunoştinţele asupra acestor conte
- Page 41 and 42:
şi cea a informaţiei sau a banilo
- Page 43 and 44:
Argumentaţia de faţă dobîndeşt
- Page 45 and 46:
care este dirijat de agent, începe
- Page 47 and 48:
Modul în care observatorii îşi e
- Page 49 and 50:
Interpretarea şi relaţionarea Mea
- Page 51 and 52:
convinge pe celălalt să accepte o
- Page 53 and 54: asupra unor teme particulare sau ev
- Page 55 and 56: interpretării şi abordarea simili
- Page 57 and 58: mereu fraţi siamezi din punct de v
- Page 59 and 60: Dată fiind discuţia anterioară,
- Page 61 and 62: intelectele. Similitudinea ajută;
- Page 63 and 64: comunalitatea de experienţă = eve
- Page 65 and 66: subiect pentru fiecare dintre ele.
- Page 67 and 68: persoane sînt „similare din punc
- Page 69 and 70: sau fixate în lumea reală. Cu toa
- Page 71 and 72: afirmă că intimitatea termenilor
- Page 73 and 74: semnificaţii personale). Această
- Page 75 and 76: Dezvoltarea realităţii relaţiona
- Page 77 and 78: dependent de ele şi are o însemn
- Page 79 and 80: Există, de asemenea, anumite eleme
- Page 81 and 82: 162 RELAŢIILE INTERPERSONALE. A GI
- Page 83 and 84: omitem, în mod natural, acţiunile
- Page 85 and 86: vedere relaţional. Mai mult, Montg
- Page 87 and 88: prin modul în care sînt privite
- Page 89 and 90: exemplu, există rezultate cu privi
- Page 91 and 92: elaţiilor, precum şi menţinerea
- Page 93 and 94: sociale, cum ar fi rolurile, normel
- Page 95 and 96: Acitelli, L.K. şi Duck, S.W. (1987
- Page 97 and 98: Canary, D.J. si Stafford, L. (eds.)
- Page 99 and 100: persuasion and retrospection in per
- Page 101 and 102: Hill, C.T., Rubin, Z. si Peplau, L.
- Page 103: marriage", in W. Burr, R. Hill, F.