Series, vol. 4, pp. 135-162), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. Kelley, H.H. (1967), ,,Attribution theory social psychology", in D. Levine (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (vol. 15, pp. 192-238), Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press. Kelley, H.H. (1983), ,,Love and commitment", in H.H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. Harvey, T.L. Houston, G. Levinger, D. McClintock, L.A. Peplau §i D. Peterson (eds.), Close relationships (pp. 265-314), San Francisco, Freeman. Kelly, G.A. (1995), The psychology of personal constructs, New York, Norton. Kelly, G.A. (1969a), Clinical psychology and personality (posthumous; B. Maher, ed.), New York, John Wiley. Kelly, G.A. (1969b), ,,Ontological acceleration", in B. Maher (ed.), Clinical psychology and personality: The collected papers of John Kelly (pp. 7-45), New York, John Wiley. Kelly, G.A. (1970), MBrief introduction to personal construct theory", in D. Bannister (ed.), Perspectives in personal construct theory (pp. 1-26), London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. BIBLIOGRAFIE 201 Kenny, D.A. (1988), nThe analysis of data from two person relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong>, D.F. Hay, S.E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes §i B. Montgomery (eds.), Handbook of personal relationships : Theory, research and interventions (pp. 57-77), New York si Chichester, John Wiley. Kenny, D.A. si Acitelli, L.K. (1989), ,,The role of the relationship in marital <strong>de</strong>cision-making", in D. Brinberg §i J.J. Jaccard (eds.), Dyadic <strong>de</strong>cision- -making (pp. 51-62), New York, Springer. Kerckhoff, A.C. (1974), ..The social context of interpersonal attraction", in T.L. Huston (ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 61-77), New York, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Kerckhoff, A.C. §i Davis, K.E. (1962), „ Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection", American Sociological Review, 27, 295-303. Kidd, V. (1975), ,,Happily ever after and other relationship styles: Advice on interpersonal relations in popular magazines, 1951-1973", Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 31-39. Klein, R. si Milardo, R. (1993), ..Third-party influences on the <strong>de</strong>velopment and maintenance of personal relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Social contexts and relationships (Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding Relationship Processes Series, vol. 3, pp. 55-77), Newbury Park, CA, Sage. Kovecses, Z. (1986), Metaphors of anger, pri<strong>de</strong>, and love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts, Amsterdam, John Benjamins. Kovecses, Z. (1991), ,,A linguist's quest for love", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 77-98. Krokoff, L., Gottman, J.M. §i Roy, A.K. (1988), ,,Blue collar and white collar marital interaction and communication orientation", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 201-221. Lacan, J. (1977), The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis, London, Hogarth. La Gaipa, J.J. (1977), ..Interpersonal attraction and social exchange", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 129-164), London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Laing, R.D., Phillipson, H. §i Lee, C. (1966), Interpersonal perception, New York, Harper si Row. Lakoff, G. (1986), ,,A figure of thought", Metaphor and symbolic activity, 1, 215-255. Lakoff, G. ?i Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors we live by, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Lea, M. s,i <strong>Duck</strong>, S.W. (1982), ,,A mo<strong>de</strong>l for the role of similarity of values in friendship <strong>de</strong>velopment", British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 301-310. Levinger, G. (1979), ,,A social exchange view of the dissolution of pair relationship", in R.L. Burgess si T.L. Huston (eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 169-193), New York, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. 202 BIBLIOGRAFIE BIBLIOGRAFIE 203 Levinger, G. si Breedlove, J. (1966), „Interpersonal attraction and agreement: A study of marriage partners", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3, 367-372. Lewis, C.S. (1960), The four loves, New York, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. Lewis, R.A. si Spainer, G.B. (1973), ..Theorizing about the quality and stability of
marriage", in W. Burr, R. Hill, F. Nye si I. Reiss (eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (vol. 1, pp. 268-294), New York, Free Press. Lyons, R.F. (in press), ..Remo<strong>de</strong>ling relationships and the handicapped", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> si J.T. Wood (eds.), Relationship challenges (Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding Relationship Processes Series, vol. 5), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. Mair, J.M. (1970), „Psychologists are human too", in D. Bannister (ed.), Perspectives in personal construct theory (pp. 157-184), London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Mair, J.M. (1976), ..Metaphors for living", in A.W. Landfield (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Personal construct psychology, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press. Marston, P.J., Hecht, M. si Roberts, T. (1987), ,,«True love ways» : The subjective experience and communication of romantic love", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 387-407. Masheter, C. si Harris, L. (1986), ..From divorce to friendship: A study of dialectic relationship <strong>de</strong>velopment", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 177-190. McAdams, D. (1993), Stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self, New York, William Morrow. McCall, G.J. (1982), ..Becoming unrelated: The management of bond dissolution", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Personal relationships 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 211-232), London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. McCall, G.J. (1988), ,,The organizational life cycle of relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong>, D.F. Hay, S.E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes si B. Montgomery (eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 467-486), New York §i Chichester, John Wiley. McCarthy, B. si <strong>Duck</strong>, S.W. (1976), ..Friendship duration and responses to attitu- dinal agreement-disagreement", British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 377-386. McFarland, C. §i Miller, D.T. (1990), „ Judgements of self-other similarity: Just like other people, only more so", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 475-484. McLaughlin, M.L. (1984), Conversation: How talk is organized, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage. Mead, G.H. (1914), ..Class lectures in social psychology", in D.L. Miller (ed.), The individual and the social self: Unpublished work of G.H. Mead, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Mead, G.H. (1967), Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (C.W. Morris, ed.), Chicago, University of Chicago Press (editia intii - 1934). Megill, A. si McCloskey, D.N. (1987), ..The rhetoric of history", in J.S. Nelson, A. Megill §i D.N. McCloskey (eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences : Language and argument scholarship and public affairs (pp. 221- 238), Madison, University of Wisconsin Press. Mehrabian, A. (1971), Silent messages, Belmont, CA, Wadworth. Metts, S., Cupach, W. si Bejlovec, R.A. (1989), „«! love you too much to ever start liking you»: Re<strong>de</strong>fining romantic relationships", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 259-274. Miell, D.E. (1984), Cognitive and communicative strategies in <strong>de</strong>veloping relationships: Converging and diverging social environments, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lancaster, UK. Miell, D.E. (1987), ^Remembering relationship <strong>de</strong>velopment: Constructing a context for interactions", in R. Burnett, P. McGhee si D. Clarke (eds.), Accounting for relationships (pp. 60-73), London, Menthuen. Miell, D.E. si <strong>Duck</strong>, S.W. (1986), ..Strategies in <strong>de</strong>veloping friendship", in V.J. Derlega si B.A. Winstead (eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 129-143), New York, Springer. Milardo, R.M. (1992), ..Comparative methods for <strong>de</strong>lineating social networks", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 447-461. Milardo, R.M., Johnson, M.P. si Huston, T.L. (1983), ..Developing close relationships : Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 964- 976. Milardo, R.M., Wellman, B. (1992), nThe personal IS social", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 339-342. Miller, D.L. (ed.) (1980), The individual and the social self: Unpublished work of G.H. Mead, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Mills, J. si Clark, M.S. (1982), ,,Communal and exchange relationships", in L. Wheeler (ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (vol. 3, pp. 121-144), Beverly Hills, CA, Sage. Monsour, M. (1994), „Similarities and dissimilarities in personal relationships: Constructing meaning and building intimacy through communication", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Dynamics of relationships (Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding Relationship Processes Series, vol. 4, pp. 112-134), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
- Page 1 and 2:
Steve Duck RELATIILE INTERPERSONALE
- Page 3 and 4:
Gramatica motivaţiilor............
- Page 5 and 6:
Lucrarea pare, astfel, să aibă ca
- Page 7 and 8:
cercetătorilor, în primul rînd,
- Page 9 and 10:
sugerează că relaţiile se află
- Page 11 and 12:
Rutt, Hurst şi Strejc, 1991). Pe m
- Page 13 and 14:
oamenilor despre ele se schimbă -
- Page 15 and 16:
elaţionării dintre două „obiec
- Page 17 and 18:
care un intelect poate transforma s
- Page 19 and 20:
conferă o senzaţie de căldură),
- Page 21 and 22:
concentrat preponderent pe relatăr
- Page 23 and 24:
elaţională pe care observatorii
- Page 25 and 26:
continuu de experienţă năvalnic
- Page 27 and 28:
Problema segmentării este valabil
- Page 29 and 30:
Billig analizează, de asemenea, un
- Page 31 and 32:
perspectiva noilor evenimente. Astf
- Page 33 and 34:
mijloceşte posibilitatea iniţial
- Page 35 and 36:
(de exemplu, Berg şi McQuinn, 1986
- Page 37 and 38:
participarea la doxa culturală sau
- Page 39 and 40:
cunoştinţele asupra acestor conte
- Page 41 and 42:
şi cea a informaţiei sau a banilo
- Page 43 and 44:
Argumentaţia de faţă dobîndeşt
- Page 45 and 46:
care este dirijat de agent, începe
- Page 47 and 48:
Modul în care observatorii îşi e
- Page 49 and 50:
Interpretarea şi relaţionarea Mea
- Page 51 and 52: convinge pe celălalt să accepte o
- Page 53 and 54: asupra unor teme particulare sau ev
- Page 55 and 56: interpretării şi abordarea simili
- Page 57 and 58: mereu fraţi siamezi din punct de v
- Page 59 and 60: Dată fiind discuţia anterioară,
- Page 61 and 62: intelectele. Similitudinea ajută;
- Page 63 and 64: comunalitatea de experienţă = eve
- Page 65 and 66: subiect pentru fiecare dintre ele.
- Page 67 and 68: persoane sînt „similare din punc
- Page 69 and 70: sau fixate în lumea reală. Cu toa
- Page 71 and 72: afirmă că intimitatea termenilor
- Page 73 and 74: semnificaţii personale). Această
- Page 75 and 76: Dezvoltarea realităţii relaţiona
- Page 77 and 78: dependent de ele şi are o însemn
- Page 79 and 80: Există, de asemenea, anumite eleme
- Page 81 and 82: 162 RELAŢIILE INTERPERSONALE. A GI
- Page 83 and 84: omitem, în mod natural, acţiunile
- Page 85 and 86: vedere relaţional. Mai mult, Montg
- Page 87 and 88: prin modul în care sînt privite
- Page 89 and 90: exemplu, există rezultate cu privi
- Page 91 and 92: elaţiilor, precum şi menţinerea
- Page 93 and 94: sociale, cum ar fi rolurile, normel
- Page 95 and 96: Acitelli, L.K. şi Duck, S.W. (1987
- Page 97 and 98: Canary, D.J. si Stafford, L. (eds.)
- Page 99 and 100: persuasion and retrospection in per
- Page 101: Hill, C.T., Rubin, Z. si Peplau, L.
- Page 105 and 106: Reis, H.T. 5! Shaver P.R. (1988), J