(Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding Relationship Processes Series, vol. 6), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. Garfinkel, H. (1967), Studies in ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall. Genera, N.P., Miller, J.B., Surrey, J. §i Baldwin, L.M. (1992), ,,Measuring perceived mutuality in close relationships: Validation of the mutual psychological <strong>de</strong>velopment questionnaire", Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 36-48. Gergen, K.J. (1990), The saturated self: Dilemmas of i<strong>de</strong>ntity in contemporary life, New York, Basic Books. Giles, H. §i Coupland, N. (1991) f Language in social context, Milton Keynes, UK, Open University Press. Ginsburg, G.P. (1988), ,,Rules, scripts, and prototypes in personal relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong>, D.F. Hay, S.E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes §i B. Montgomery (eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 23-40), New York §i Chichester, John Wiley. Gli<strong>de</strong>well, J.C., Tucker, S., Todt, M. §i Cox, S. (1982), professional support systems - The teaching profession", in A. Nadler, J.D. Fisher §i B.M. De 198 BIBLIOGRAFIE BIBLIOGRAFIE 199 Paulo (eds.), Applied research in help-seeking and reactions to aid (pp. 163-184), New York, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Goffman, E. (1959), Behavior in public places, Harmondsworth, UK, Penguin. Goffman, E. (1971), Relations in public: Microstudies of the public or<strong>de</strong>r, New York, Harper §i Row. Gottman, J.M. (1979), Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Gottman, J.M. (1991), ..Predicting the longitudinal course of marriages", Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 17, 3-7. Han<strong>de</strong>l, G. (1993, May), Contradictions in a children's urban environment in the mid-twentieth century, Paper presented to the Qualitative Research Conference, University of Waterloo, Canada. Harre, R. (1977), ..Friendship as an accomplishment: An ethogenic approach to social relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 254-338), London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Harris, L.M. si Sa<strong>de</strong>ghi, A. (1987), ..Realizing: How facts are created in human interaction", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 480-495. Harvey, J.H., Orbuch, T.L. si Weber, A.L. (1992), ..The convergence of the attribution and accounts concepts in the study of close relationships", in J.H. Harvey, T.L. Orbuch si A.L. Weber (eds.), Attributions, accounts, and close relationships (pp. 1-18), New York, Springer. Harvey, J.H., Weber, A.L. si Orbuch, T.L. (1990), Interpersonal accounts: A social psychological perspective, Oxford, Basil Blackwell. Hauser, G. (1986), Introduction to rhetorical theory, New York, Harper si Row. Kazan, C. si Shaver, P.R. (1987), ..Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524. Hecht, M., Marston, P.J. si Larkey, L.K. (1994), ,,Love ways and relationships quality", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 25-43. Hei<strong>de</strong>r, F. (1958), The psychology of interpersonal relations, New York, John Wiley. Hendrick, C. si Hendrick, S.S. (1986), ,,A theory and a method of love", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402. Hendrick, C. §i Hendrick, S.S. (1988), ,,Lovers wear rose colored glasses", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 161-183. Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S.S., Foote, F. si Slapion- Foote, M. (1984), ,,Do men and women love differently?", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 177-196. Hendrick, S.S. (1987), ,,Self disclosure and marital satisfaction", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1150-1159. Hendrick, S.S. si Hendrick, C. (1993), ..Loversas friends", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 459-466. Hewes, D.E. si Planalp, S. (1982), ,,There is nothing as useful as a good theory... The influence of social knowledge on interpersonal communication", in M.E. Roloff s.i C.R. Berger (eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 107-150), Beverly Hills, CA, Sage. Hewstone, M. (1992), ..Towards a <strong>de</strong>eper un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of close relationships", in J.H. Harvey, T.L. Orbuch si A.L. Weber (eds.), Attributions, accounts, and close relationships (pp. 257-126), New York, Springer.
Hill, C.T., Rubin, Z. si Peplau, L.A. (1976), ..Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs", Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147-168. Hin<strong>de</strong>, R.A. (1981), ,,The bases of a science of interpersonal relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> §i R. Gilmour (eds.), Personal relationships 1: studying personal relationships (pp. 1-22), New York, San Francisco, London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Hinkle, D. (1970), ..The game of personal constructs", in D. Bannister (ed.), Perspectives in personal construct theory (pp. 91-110), London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Hocker, J. §i Wilmot, W. (1989), Interpersonal conflict (3rd ed.), Dubuque, IA, William C. Brown. Hogan, R., Mankin, D. (1970), ..Determinants of interpersonal attraction: A clarification", Psychological Reports, 26, 235-238. Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1992), ..Attribution and maritally violent men: The role of cognitions in marital violence", in J.H. Harvey, T.L. Orbuch §i A.L. Weber (eds.), Attributions, accounts, and close relationships (pp. 165-175), New York, Springer. Honeycutt, J.M. (1993), ,,Memory structures for the rise and fall of personal relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Individuals in relationships (Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding Relationship Processes Series, vol. 1, pp. 60-86), Newbury Park, CA, Sage. Hopper, R., Knapp, M.L. si Scott, L. (1981), ,,Couples' personal idioms: Exploring intimate talk", Journal of Communication, 31, 23-33. Huesmann, L.R. si Levinger, G. (1976), ..Incremental exchange theory", in L. Berkowitz §i E.H. Walster (eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, New York, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Ickes, W. (1993, June), Empathic accuracy in personal relationships, Invited paper presented to the fourth conference of the International Network on Personal Relationships, Milwaukee, WI. Ickes, W. §i Gonzales, J. (n.d.), ..Social" cognition and SOCIAL cognition : From the subjective to the intersubjective, Manuscript submitted for publication. Ickes, W., Robertson, E., Toke, W. si Teng, G. (1986), ..Naturalistic social cognition: Methodology, assessment and validation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 66-82. f 200 BIBLIOGRAFIE Ickes, W., Tooke, W., Stinson, L., Baker, V.L. §i Bissonnette, V. (1988), nNaturalistic social cognition: Intersubjectivity in same-sex dyads", Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 58-84. Ickes, W. §i Turner, M. (1983), ,,On the social advantages of having an ol<strong>de</strong>r, opposite sex sibling : Birth or<strong>de</strong>r influences in mixed-sex dyads", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 210-222. Izard, C.E. (1963), ..Personality similarity and friendship", Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 47-51. Johnson, M. (1982), ,,Social and cognitive features of dissolving commitment to relationships", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Personal relationships 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 51-74), London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Jones, W.H. si Bur<strong>de</strong>tte, M.P. (1994), ,,Betrayal in close relationships", in A.L. Weber si J.H. Harvey (eds.), Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 243-262), Boston, Allyn §i Bacon. Jones, W.H., Hansson, R.O. §i Cutrona, C.E. (1984), ,,Helping the lonely: Issues of intervention with young and ol<strong>de</strong>r adults", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Personal relationships 5: Repairing personal relationships (pp. 143-162), London, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press. Jourard, S.M. (1971), Self-disclosure, New York, John Wiley. Katovich, M.A. §i Couch, C.J. (1992), ,,The nature of social pasts and their use as foundation for situated action", Symbolic interaction, 15, 25-47. Keeley, M. §i Hart, A. (1994), ^Nonverbal behavior in interaction", in S.W. <strong>Duck</strong> (ed.), Dynamics of interactions (Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding Relationship Processes,
- Page 1 and 2:
Steve Duck RELATIILE INTERPERSONALE
- Page 3 and 4:
Gramatica motivaţiilor............
- Page 5 and 6:
Lucrarea pare, astfel, să aibă ca
- Page 7 and 8:
cercetătorilor, în primul rînd,
- Page 9 and 10:
sugerează că relaţiile se află
- Page 11 and 12:
Rutt, Hurst şi Strejc, 1991). Pe m
- Page 13 and 14:
oamenilor despre ele se schimbă -
- Page 15 and 16:
elaţionării dintre două „obiec
- Page 17 and 18:
care un intelect poate transforma s
- Page 19 and 20:
conferă o senzaţie de căldură),
- Page 21 and 22:
concentrat preponderent pe relatăr
- Page 23 and 24:
elaţională pe care observatorii
- Page 25 and 26:
continuu de experienţă năvalnic
- Page 27 and 28:
Problema segmentării este valabil
- Page 29 and 30:
Billig analizează, de asemenea, un
- Page 31 and 32:
perspectiva noilor evenimente. Astf
- Page 33 and 34:
mijloceşte posibilitatea iniţial
- Page 35 and 36:
(de exemplu, Berg şi McQuinn, 1986
- Page 37 and 38:
participarea la doxa culturală sau
- Page 39 and 40:
cunoştinţele asupra acestor conte
- Page 41 and 42:
şi cea a informaţiei sau a banilo
- Page 43 and 44:
Argumentaţia de faţă dobîndeşt
- Page 45 and 46:
care este dirijat de agent, începe
- Page 47 and 48:
Modul în care observatorii îşi e
- Page 49 and 50: Interpretarea şi relaţionarea Mea
- Page 51 and 52: convinge pe celălalt să accepte o
- Page 53 and 54: asupra unor teme particulare sau ev
- Page 55 and 56: interpretării şi abordarea simili
- Page 57 and 58: mereu fraţi siamezi din punct de v
- Page 59 and 60: Dată fiind discuţia anterioară,
- Page 61 and 62: intelectele. Similitudinea ajută;
- Page 63 and 64: comunalitatea de experienţă = eve
- Page 65 and 66: subiect pentru fiecare dintre ele.
- Page 67 and 68: persoane sînt „similare din punc
- Page 69 and 70: sau fixate în lumea reală. Cu toa
- Page 71 and 72: afirmă că intimitatea termenilor
- Page 73 and 74: semnificaţii personale). Această
- Page 75 and 76: Dezvoltarea realităţii relaţiona
- Page 77 and 78: dependent de ele şi are o însemn
- Page 79 and 80: Există, de asemenea, anumite eleme
- Page 81 and 82: 162 RELAŢIILE INTERPERSONALE. A GI
- Page 83 and 84: omitem, în mod natural, acţiunile
- Page 85 and 86: vedere relaţional. Mai mult, Montg
- Page 87 and 88: prin modul în care sînt privite
- Page 89 and 90: exemplu, există rezultate cu privi
- Page 91 and 92: elaţiilor, precum şi menţinerea
- Page 93 and 94: sociale, cum ar fi rolurile, normel
- Page 95 and 96: Acitelli, L.K. şi Duck, S.W. (1987
- Page 97 and 98: Canary, D.J. si Stafford, L. (eds.)
- Page 99: persuasion and retrospection in per
- Page 103 and 104: marriage", in W. Burr, R. Hill, F.
- Page 105 and 106: Reis, H.T. 5! Shaver P.R. (1988), J