29.01.2013 Views

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76<br />

<strong>Anais</strong> <strong>do</strong> IHC’2001 - IV Workshop sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais<br />

were not able to complete all three tasks). Some web pages displayed poorly on low<br />

resolution screens, requiring horizontal scrolling, and there was lack of format consistency<br />

between some of them.<br />

To compare the selected evaluation methods, the criteria previously mentioned<br />

were analyzed in <strong>de</strong>tail. In or<strong>de</strong>r to easily i<strong>de</strong>ntify the evaluation groups, the following<br />

acronyms will be used throughout this paper:<br />

Table 1 - Evaluation groups.<br />

Non-experts<br />

ISO 9241-10 group Non_E_ISO<br />

Control group Non_E_Cntl<br />

Ergonomic Criteria group Non_E_EC<br />

Heuristic Evaluation group Non_E_Heu<br />

Usability In<strong>de</strong>x group<br />

Software engineers<br />

Non_E_In<strong>de</strong>x<br />

Heuristic Evaluation group SE_Heu<br />

Usability In<strong>de</strong>x group<br />

Usability experts<br />

SE_In<strong>de</strong>x<br />

Heuristic Evaluation group UE_Heu<br />

Usability In<strong>de</strong>x group UE_In<strong>de</strong>x<br />

Average evaluation time<br />

Comparing the time spent by all evaluation groups, it was noticed that non-experts took<br />

more time to complete this activity than software engineers or usability experts. The largest<br />

average time (4:27h) was spent by the EC non-expert group, while the shortest one (1:11h)<br />

was that of the usability expert group using the Heuristics method. Among the In<strong>de</strong>x<br />

groups, software engineers were the fastest group (avg time = 1:54h).<br />

The time spent by the researcher was 46% smaller with software engineers and<br />

usability experts, in comparison to non-expert groups, because it was unnecessary to be<br />

present during evaluation sessions, and to correct evaluation form fields during data<br />

analysis of expert groups results.<br />

No usability expert or software engineer asked the researcher to solve any <strong>do</strong>ubts<br />

about the evaluation process, and no filling errors were i<strong>de</strong>ntified on their evaluation forms.<br />

Allied to their previous computer and/or usability knowledge, the evaluation gui<strong>de</strong>, sent by<br />

e-mail to these groups, was consi<strong>de</strong>red clear enough for their un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the steps to<br />

be followed.<br />

Number and type of i<strong>de</strong>ntified usability problems<br />

Table 2 shows the distribution of usability problems found by all groups. The pre<strong>do</strong>minant<br />

types of usability problems were: 'Error prevention', 'Visibility, recognition and<br />

conduction', and 'Flexibility and efficiency of use'. Software engineers (SE) and usability<br />

experts (UE) using the In<strong>de</strong>x method were the groups that i<strong>de</strong>ntified more of these types of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!