29.01.2013 Views

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Anais</strong> <strong>do</strong> IHC’2001 - IV Workshop sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais 73<br />

Comparing usability evaluation methods applied to<br />

corporate web portals<br />

Cláudia Dias<br />

Depto <strong>de</strong> Ciência da Informação e Documentação - Universida<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> Brasília<br />

AOS 04 Bloco A apt 522 - Brasília - 70660-041, Brazil<br />

claudiaad@yahoo.com<br />

Abstract. The variety of usability evaluation methods, the need to adapt them to<br />

the system's context of use, and the technological evolution of information<br />

management - the corporate web portal - suggested the research problem of<br />

comparing usability evaluation methods, applied to corporate portals’ context of<br />

use. The goal of the present study was first to compare four usability evaluation<br />

methods, when employed by non-expert people, and second to verify the influence<br />

of the evaluators' experience and abilities on the results of usability evaluations<br />

of web portals.<br />

Keywords: usability evaluation, corporate portal, web interface, humancomputer<br />

interaction<br />

Introduction<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to compare usability evaluation methods applied to corporate web portals, the<br />

context of use of the sample portal, selected for this study, was first analyzed, i<strong>de</strong>ntifying<br />

its typical users, their characteristics, the tasks they seek to achieve, and their<br />

organizational and computing environments. After that, during the literature review about<br />

usability and human-computer interaction, 17 usability evaluation methods were selected:<br />

eight inspection methods and nine user testing methods.<br />

To choose the methods that would be compared in this study, 11 criteria were<br />

established: procedure and typical location of data collection, data type and source,<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment phase and status, usability factors measured by the method, cost of<br />

evaluation, reliability of measurements, technical support nee<strong>de</strong>d, and additional costs, like<br />

users' involvement, materials, training. Among the evaluation methods pre-selected, four<br />

inspection methods were chosen, according to these criteria:<br />

• a standard for the ergonomy and usability of information technology products - the ISO<br />

9241-10 Dialogue principles (ISO, 1996);<br />

• an ergonomic <strong>de</strong>sign gui<strong>de</strong>line - the Ergonomic Criteria (Bastien & Scapin, 1993);<br />

• a checklist - the Usability In<strong>de</strong>x Checklist for Websites (Keevil, 1998); and<br />

• the heuristic evaluation, whose support tool - the Corporate Portal Heuristics (Dias,<br />

2001) - was elaborated for this research, based on the context of use of the sample<br />

corporate portal and on several principles or heuristics published by usability authors.<br />

To compare not only the quality of the chosen methods, but also the effect of the<br />

evaluators' experience and abilities, the usability inspection of the sample corporate portal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!