29.01.2013 Views

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Anais</strong> <strong>do</strong> IHC’2001 - IV Workshop sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais 39<br />

proposed that a conversation should follow a general principle called the Cooperative<br />

Principle (CP):<br />

“Make your conversational contribution such as is required,<br />

at the stage at which it occurs, by the accepted purpose or<br />

direction of the talk exchange in which you are engaged.”<br />

(Grice, 1975:45)<br />

This principle is supported by a number of conversational conventions, or maxims:<br />

Maxim of Quantity: Make your contribution as informative<br />

as is required (for the current purposes of the exchange). Do<br />

not make your contribution more informative than is required.<br />

Maxim of Quality: Do not say what you believe to be false.<br />

Do not say that for which you lack a<strong>de</strong>quate evi<strong>de</strong>nce.<br />

Maxim of Relation: Be relevant.<br />

Maxim of Manner: Be perspicuous. Avoid obscurity of<br />

expression. Avoid ambiguity. Be brief (avoid unnecessary<br />

prolixity). Be or<strong>de</strong>rly.<br />

In addition, Grice proposes that a maxim such as “Be polite” is also normally observed.<br />

In the next section, we present a case study in which we analyze multiple<br />

environments for a single set of services, in view of the aforementioned interaction mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

and pragmatic principles.<br />

4. Banking Environments: A Case Study<br />

In our case study, we chose the application of a banking system, due to its immediate<br />

availability in multiple environments: phone banking, ATM, and web banking. The task<br />

was to check the balance of one of his checking accounts. During the test, we took notes<br />

about how the user carried out the interaction, specified it in the LECI language, and ma<strong>de</strong><br />

some brief discourse analysis of the conversation that was exchanged between user and<br />

system. Our goal was twofold: first, we wanted to check if LECI could be used to specify<br />

an application’s interaction possibilities at a high level of abstraction (in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly of the<br />

environment), that would later be specialized or instantiated according to the environment.<br />

Second, we wanted to investigate if a discourse analysis could complement the analysis<br />

based on the LECI language.<br />

4.1 Phone System<br />

Figure 1 illustrates the interaction that took place in the phone-banking system, and the<br />

corresponding LECI specification (to the right):

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!