29.01.2013 Views

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

Anais do IHC'2001 - Departamento de Informática e Estatística - UFSC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38<br />

<strong>Anais</strong> <strong>do</strong> IHC’2001 - IV Workshop sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais<br />

Task CheckBalanceAccount (Domain Information)<br />

sequence<br />

{<br />

Dialog AccountNumberPassword (Information Request)<br />

Dialog ServicesSelection (Selection)<br />

Dialog AccountServices (Selection) <br />

Dialog AccountBalance (Domain Information) <br />

}<br />

where CheckBalanceAccount is the task name, Domain Information is the<br />

semantic type of the task. This task is composed of the dialogs<br />

AccountNumberPassword, ServicesSelection, AccountServices,<br />

and AccountBalance, each one with its corresponding semantic type. The<br />

clause indicates that dialog is ma<strong>de</strong> available simultaneously<br />

within the current dialog. The term sequence indicates that the dialogs between system<br />

and user will be exchanged in the specified or<strong>de</strong>r.<br />

Dahis’ language has a grammar in which <strong>de</strong>signers may specify the syntax and<br />

semantics of interaction conversations. However, until now it has not addressed in <strong>de</strong>pth<br />

some important pragmatic issues that may gui<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>signers as to how to combine these<br />

components into a usable dialog structure. A comprehensive study of this matter was left<br />

for future work on her dissertation.<br />

In addition, although she claimed to be media- and environment-in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt, she<br />

provi<strong>de</strong>d little evi<strong>de</strong>nce to support this claim. In this paper, we will present a case study in<br />

which we analyze an application in three different environments, and raise a few questions<br />

about how her mo<strong>de</strong>l could be enriched by analyzing linguistic aspects, in particular<br />

through discourse analysis and pragmatics.<br />

3. Discourse Analysis & Pragmatics<br />

Discourse analysis can be said to study “how humans use language to communicate and, in<br />

particular, how addressers construct linguistic messages for addressees and how addressees<br />

work on linguistic messages in or<strong>de</strong>r to interpret them.” (Brown & Yule, 1983:ix). Several<br />

views can be consi<strong>de</strong>red, viewing sentence-as-object, text-as-product, and discourse-asprocess.<br />

As one may guess, the latter view is much in line with Semiotic Engineering. In it,<br />

sentences in a discourse are consi<strong>de</strong>red to be an evi<strong>de</strong>nce of an attempt by a speaker/writer<br />

(message producer) to communicate a message to a hearer/rea<strong>de</strong>r (message recipient). Both<br />

production and interpretation processes are studied as two ends of a larger communication<br />

process.<br />

Some of the issues we find interesting to investigate in HCI by making a parallel<br />

with studies in related communication fields are: topic of conversation, topic-shift, turn<br />

taking, references and anaphors, context, co-text, presuppositions, implicatures, and so on.<br />

We would like to refer the rea<strong>de</strong>r to Brown & Yule for an in-<strong>de</strong>pth discussion about these<br />

concepts. In this paper, we will approach some of these issues as they are brought up in our<br />

case study.<br />

In consi<strong>de</strong>ring interaction from a conversational perspective, we may also find it<br />

useful to try to apply studies from Pragmatics to HCI. In particular, Grice (1975) has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!