13.07.2015 Views

abril de 2004 - CCHLA - Universidade Federal da Paraíba

abril de 2004 - CCHLA - Universidade Federal da Paraíba

abril de 2004 - CCHLA - Universidade Federal da Paraíba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.The implication that the vernacular meaning of selfesteemhas a pri<strong>de</strong>/shame component is supported by anempirical study of the relationship between self-esteemscores and affect. Using two self-esteem scales and ascale measuring positive and negative affect, Brown andMarshall (2001) found that pri<strong>de</strong> and shame were the twoemotions having the highest correlations with self-esteemscores.But <strong>de</strong>finition # 2 of self-esteem, above, points toanother component: it mentions no emotions or feelings.Instead, it <strong>de</strong>fines self-esteem cognitively, holding a goodopinion of self. Self-esteem scales appear to emphasizethis second meaning. Self-esteem scales and studies focuson that part of self-concept, self-evaluation, which isverbally <strong>de</strong>scribed and cognitive, rather than affective andsocial. With a stan<strong>da</strong>rdized paper and pencil test, it wouldbe difficult to get at the affective component directly.Although there are two hundred scales that <strong>de</strong>fineself-esteem operationally, I have been unable to find asingle conceptual <strong>de</strong>finition. But the confound betweenself-evaluation and self-feeling discussed here has comeup indirectly. Baumeister et al (1996) have suggested thata too high self-esteem, which they equate with mereegotism, can lead to aggression when egotism isthreatened. But if self-feeling is <strong>de</strong>fined as the principlecomponent of high self-esteem, genuine pri<strong>de</strong>, theBaumeister paradox wouldn’t arise.Their discussion ignores the distinctions betweengenuine pri<strong>de</strong> and false pri<strong>de</strong> (egotism), and betweenconscious shame and shame that is outsi<strong>de</strong> awareness.Self-esteem might be <strong>de</strong>fined conceptually as a ratiobased on proneness to genuine pri<strong>de</strong> as against pronenessto shame/embarrassment, every<strong>da</strong>y emotions that areprevalent in virtually all kinds of encounters and manystates of consciousness. Since positive self-evaluationmay be based on egotism and false pri<strong>de</strong>, scales confoun<strong>de</strong>gotism, high cognitive self-evaluation, with high-selfesteem (justified pri<strong>de</strong>).The effect of a mo<strong>de</strong>l of self-esteem that has bothcognitive and feeling components can be represented in asimple table.Self Feeling123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!