12.07.2015 Views

art01 - omena júnior.indd - Sociedade Brasileira de Ornitologia

art01 - omena júnior.indd - Sociedade Brasileira de Ornitologia

art01 - omena júnior.indd - Sociedade Brasileira de Ornitologia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Frugivory by birds in Myrsine coriacea (Myrsinaceae) inhabiting fragments of mixedAraucaria Forest in the Aparados da Serra National Park, RS, BrazilAparecida Brusamarello Basler; Eliara Solange Müller and; Maria Virginia Petry115bird pecks the fruit with its beak, pulling out portionsof it).Factorial ANOVA was used to evaluate bird behaviour,taking into account the size of the forest area, speciesrichness and number of events. Kruskal-Wallis wasapplied to compare the richness of birds visiting M. coriaceain different forest fragments. Repeated MeasuresANOVA was applied to assess the variation in richnessbetween months according to the size of the area.RESultsThirty-one bird species were recor<strong>de</strong>d visiting theM. coriacea individuals, among which 23 species consumedfruits; 18 also used the tree for perching and fivealso foraged, capturing invertebrates. Consi<strong>de</strong>ring speciesrichness (F = 7.536; df = 2.12; P = 0.008) and the numberof events for each behaviour (F = 6.809; df = 2.12;P = 0.011), the birds preferentially used the tree for fruitconsumption. The interaction between bird behaviourand area size did not affect species richness or the numberof events recor<strong>de</strong>d for each behaviour (F = 1.488;df = 2.12; P = 0.265 and F = 1.291; df = 2.12; P = 0.310,respectively) (Figure 1 and 2).Among the birds visiting M. coriacea, nine specieswere only observed in large areas, eight were only seenin small areas and another 14 were recor<strong>de</strong>d in both areasizes. Area size (F = 0.062; df = 3.12; P = 0.979), variationbetween months from November to February (F = 3.5;df = 1; P = 0.658) and the interaction of these factors(F = 0.639; df = 3.12; P = 0.604) did not affect speciesrichness of birds visiting M. coriacea (Figure 3 and 4).74.2% of the birds recor<strong>de</strong>d (23 species) were classifiedas insectivorous and, <strong>de</strong>spite feeding basically oninvertebrates, 82.6% of these (19 species) also consumedfruits, whereas 17.4% (four species), namely Colaptescampestris, Xiphorhyncus fuscus, Leptasthenura setaria andXenops rutilans, consumed only insects. The frugivorousguild represented 12.9% of the total. 75% of this guild(four species) consumed fruit; Tangara preciosa is a specieswithin this guild, but did not consume fruit. The omnivorousguild represented 6.5% of the total (two species):Cyclarhis gujanensis, which was only observed perching;and Cyanocorax caeruleus, which consumed fruit. Thegranivorous and nectarivorous guilds each represented3.2% of the total, each with one species, respectively,Zonotrichia capensis and Leucochloris albicollis (Table 1).A total of 348 visits were recor<strong>de</strong>d, 31, 03% (108visits) of which were complete, 60.34% (210) were incompleteand 8.63% (30) were of pairs or flocks reachingthe tree, which were not accompanied. 284 visits werema<strong>de</strong> by birds arriving to the tree individually, 26 by birdsin pairs, four by mono-specific flocks and four by mixedflocks. For complete visits, fruit consumption totalled64 visits (60%); perching totalled 36 visits (34%); andFIGuRE 2: Frequency of fruit consumption, insect consumption andperching in different sizes of Araucaria Forest fragments.FIGuRE 1: Bird species richness regarding fruit consumption, insectconsumption and perching in different sizes of Araucaria Forestfragments.FIGuRE 3: Species richness of birds visiting Myrsine ferruginea indifferent sizes of Araucaria Forest fragments.Revista <strong>Brasileira</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Ornitologia</strong>, 17(2), 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!