My title - Departamento de Matemática da Universidade do Minho
My title - Departamento de Matemática da Universidade do Minho My title - Departamento de Matemática da Universidade do Minho
10 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF ORBITS 68 for any (bounded) continuous function ϕ : X → R. The space C 0 (X, R) of bounded continuous real valued functions on X, equipped with the sup norm, is a separable Banach space. In particular, it admits a countable set of points {ϕ n } n∈N which is dense in its unit sphere. Given that, one defines, for any couple of Borel probability measures µ and ν, a distance ∞∑ ∫ ∫ d (µ, ν) = 2 −n · ∣ ϕ n dµ − ϕ n dν ∣ n=1 It turns out that d is indeed a metric, and that it induces the weak ∗ topology on Prob. The important fact (somewhere called ”Helly’s theorem”), which follows from the Ascoli-Arzela theorem together with the above Riesz-Markov representation theorem, is that Prob, equipped with the weak ∗ topology, is a compact space: any sequence (µ n ) of Borel probability measures admits a weakly ∗ convergent subsequence µ ni → µ. Now, we are in position to prove the existence of invariant probability measures for certain well behaved dynamical systems. X X Krylov-Bogolyubov theorem. A continuous transformation f : X → X of a metrizable compact space X admits at least one Borel invariant probability measure. proof. Take any Borel probability measure µ 0 on X, and inductively define a family of probability measures µ n by µ n+1 = f ∗ µ n . Consider the family of Cesaro means µ n = 1 n∑ µ k n + 1 Since the space of Borel probability measures on a compact metrizable space is compact w.r.t. weak ∗ convergence, there exist a weakly ∗ convergent subsequence µ ni → µ. One then easily sees that ∫ 1 ∑n i ∫ (ϕ ◦ f) dµ = lim (ϕ ◦ f) dµ k X i→∞ n i + 1 k=0 X 1 ∑n i ∫ = lim ϕdµ k+1 i→∞ n i + 1 k=0 X 1 ∑n i ∫ = lim ϕdµ k + 1 (∫ ∫ ) ϕdµ ni+1 − ϕdµ 0 i→∞ n i + 1 k=0 X n i + 1 X X ∫ = ϕdµ X for any bounded continuous observable ϕ, hence that µ is an invariant measure. □ k=0 10.3 Invariant measures and time averages The relevance of invariant measures when studying the dynamics of continuous transformations is due to the following crucial observations. Invariant measures and time averages. Assume that, for a given point x ∈ X, the time averages 1 n∑ ϕ (x) = lim ϕ ( f k (x) ) n→∞ n + 1 do exist for any bounded continuos observable ϕ. One easily shows that the funcional Cb 0 (X, R) → R defined by ϕ ↦→ ϕ (x) is linear, bounded and positive definite. There follows from the Riesz- Markov representation theorem that there exists a unique Borel probability measure µ x on X such that ∫ ϕ (x) = ϕdµ x X k=0
10 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF ORBITS 69 for any ϕ ∈ C 0 b (X, R). The invariance property ϕ (x) = (ϕ ◦ f) (x) then implies that ∫ X (ϕ ◦ f) dµ x = ∫ X ϕdµ x for any ϕ, hence that µ x is an invariant probability measure. In the language of physicists, this says that ”time averages” along the orbit of x are equal to ”space averages” with respect to the measure µ x . One is thus lead to consider the following questions. Do there exist points x for which time averages exists Given an invariant measure µ, do there exist, and how many, points x such that µ = µ x Example: periodic orbits. Let p be a periodic point with period n. The time average ϕ (p) of any observable ϕ exists, and is equal to the arithmetic mean of ϕ along the orbit, namely ϕ (p) = 1 n−1 ∑ ϕ (f n (p)) n k=0 If µ p denotes the normalized sum 1 ∑ n−1 n k=0 δ f n (p) of Dirac masses placed on the orbit of p, this amount to say that ϕ (p) = ∫ X ϕdµ p. Let p be a fixed point, and ϕ : X → R be an observable which is continuous at p. If x ∈ W s (p), then the time average ϕ (x) exists and is equal to ϕ (p), i.e. time averages of points in the basin of attraction of p are described by the Dirac measure µ p = δ p . The Birkhoff-Khinchin ergodic theorem. Ergodic theorems are the milestones of ergodic theory, and deal with various type of convergence of the time means ϕ n for certain classes of observables ϕ. In particular, the Birkhoff-Khinchin ergodic theorem must be thougth as the generalization of the Kolmogorov strong law of large numbers, as it says that time means of certain well-behaved observables exist almost everywhere. The Birkhoff-Khinchin ergodic theorem was actually preceeded by the von Neumann’s ”statistic” ergodic theorem, which says that von Neumann “statistic” ergodic theorem. Let U be a unitary operator on a Hilbert space H, let H U = {v ∈ H s.t. Uv = v} denote the closed subspace of those vectors which are fixed by U, and P U : H → H U denote the orthogonal projection onto H U . Then, for any vector v ∈ H we have 1 n∑ lim U k v − P n→∞ ∥ U v∥ = 0 n + 1 k=0 If f : X → X is an endomorphism of the probability space (X, E, µ), one can consider the “shift” operator U : L 2 (µ) → L 2 (µ) given by (Uϕ) (x) = ϕ (f (x)). It is clearly unitary, its fixed point set is the space of invariant L 2 -observable. The von Neumann theorem then asserts convergence of time means ϕ n → ϕ in L 2 (µ). Here, we prove the ∥ H Birkhoff-Khinchin “individual” ergodic theorem. Let f : X → X be an endomorphism of the probability space (X, E, µ), and let ϕ ∈ L 1 (µ) be an integrable observable. Then the limit 1 ϕ(x) = lim n→∞ n + 1 n∑ ϕ ( f k (x) ) exists for µ-almost any x ∈ X. Moreover, the observable ϕ is in L 1 (µ), is invariant, and satisfies ∫ ∫ ϕdµ = ϕdµ k=0
- Page 17 and 18: 3 SISTEMAS DINÂMICOS TOPOLÓGICOS,
- Page 19 and 20: 3 SISTEMAS DINÂMICOS TOPOLÓGICOS,
- Page 21 and 22: 4 NÚMEROS E DINÂMICA 21 4 Número
- Page 23 and 24: 4 NÚMEROS E DINÂMICA 23 4.2 Deslo
- Page 25 and 26: 4 NÚMEROS E DINÂMICA 25 Rotaçõe
- Page 27 and 28: 4 NÚMEROS E DINÂMICA 27 Observe q
- Page 29 and 30: 4 NÚMEROS E DINÂMICA 29 Frações
- Page 31 and 32: 5 ÓRBITAS REGULARES E PERTURBAÇÕ
- Page 33 and 34: 5 ÓRBITAS REGULARES E PERTURBAÇÕ
- Page 35 and 36: 5 ÓRBITAS REGULARES E PERTURBAÇÕ
- Page 37 and 38: 5 ÓRBITAS REGULARES E PERTURBAÇÕ
- Page 39 and 40: 6 FLOWS 39 6 Flows “... forse sti
- Page 41 and 42: 6 FLOWS 41 6.2 Integration of one-d
- Page 43 and 44: 6 FLOWS 43 Counter-example. Both th
- Page 45 and 46: 6 FLOWS 45 which undergoes a catast
- Page 47 and 48: 6 FLOWS 47 Uniqueness of solutons.
- Page 49 and 50: 6 FLOWS 49 Dependence on initial da
- Page 51 and 52: 7 OSCILLATIONS AND CYCLES 51 7 Osci
- Page 53 and 54: 7 OSCILLATIONS AND CYCLES 53 Phase
- Page 55 and 56: 7 OSCILLATIONS AND CYCLES 55 The ge
- Page 57 and 58: 7 OSCILLATIONS AND CYCLES 57 para a
- Page 59 and 60: 8 LINEARIZAÇÃO 59 8 Linearizaçã
- Page 61 and 62: 9 TRANSVERSALIDADE E BIFURCAÇÕES
- Page 63 and 64: 10 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF ORBIT
- Page 65 and 66: 10 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF ORBIT
- Page 67: 10 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF ORBIT
- Page 71 and 72: 10 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF ORBIT
- Page 73 and 74: 10 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF ORBIT
- Page 75 and 76: 11 RECORRÊNCIAS 75 Exercícios.
- Page 77 and 78: 11 RECORRÊNCIAS 77 O conjunto não
- Page 79 and 80: 12 TRANSITIVIDADE E ÓRBITAS DENSAS
- Page 81 and 82: 12 TRANSITIVIDADE E ÓRBITAS DENSAS
- Page 83 and 84: 13 HOMEOMORFISMOS DO CÍRCULO 83 13
- Page 85 and 86: 13 HOMEOMORFISMOS DO CÍRCULO 85 de
- Page 87 and 88: 14 PERDA DE MEMÓRIA E INDEPENDÊNC
- Page 89 and 90: 14 PERDA DE MEMÓRIA E INDEPENDÊNC
- Page 91 and 92: 14 PERDA DE MEMÓRIA E INDEPENDÊNC
- Page 93 and 94: 14 PERDA DE MEMÓRIA E INDEPENDÊNC
- Page 95 and 96: 14 PERDA DE MEMÓRIA E INDEPENDÊNC
- Page 97 and 98: 15 DIMENSIONS, FRACTALS AND ENTROPY
- Page 99 and 100: 15 DIMENSIONS, FRACTALS AND ENTROPY
- Page 101 and 102: 15 DIMENSIONS, FRACTALS AND ENTROPY
- Page 103 and 104: 16 ERGODICITY AND CONVERGENCE OF TI
- Page 105 and 106: 16 ERGODICITY AND CONVERGENCE OF TI
- Page 107 and 108: REFERÊNCIAS 107 Referências [AA67
10 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF ORBITS 69<br />
for any ϕ ∈ C 0 b (X, R). The invariance property ϕ (x) = (ϕ ◦ f) (x) then implies that ∫ X (ϕ ◦ f) dµ x =<br />
∫<br />
X ϕdµ x for any ϕ, hence that µ x is an invariant probability measure. In the language of physicists,<br />
this says that ”time averages” along the orbit of x are equal to ”space averages” with respect to<br />
the measure µ x .<br />
One is thus lead to consi<strong>de</strong>r the following questions. Do there exist points x for which time<br />
averages exists Given an invariant measure µ, <strong>do</strong> there exist, and how many, points x such that<br />
µ = µ x <br />
Example: periodic orbits. Let p be a periodic point with period n. The time average ϕ (p)<br />
of any observable ϕ exists, and is equal to the arithmetic mean of ϕ along the orbit, namely<br />
ϕ (p) = 1 n−1<br />
∑<br />
ϕ (f n (p))<br />
n<br />
k=0<br />
If µ p <strong>de</strong>notes the normalized sum 1 ∑ n−1<br />
n k=0 δ f n (p) of Dirac masses placed on the orbit of p, this<br />
amount to say that ϕ (p) = ∫ X ϕdµ p.<br />
Let p be a fixed point, and ϕ : X → R be an observable which is continuous at p. If x ∈ W s (p),<br />
then the time average ϕ (x) exists and is equal to ϕ (p), i.e. time averages of points in the basin of<br />
attraction of p are <strong>de</strong>scribed by the Dirac measure µ p = δ p .<br />
The Birkhoff-Khinchin ergodic theorem. Ergodic theorems are the milestones of ergodic<br />
theory, and <strong>de</strong>al with various type of convergence of the time means ϕ n for certain classes of<br />
observables ϕ. In particular, the Birkhoff-Khinchin ergodic theorem must be thougth as the generalization<br />
of the Kolmogorov strong law of large numbers, as it says that time means of certain<br />
well-behaved observables exist almost everywhere. The Birkhoff-Khinchin ergodic theorem was<br />
actually precee<strong>de</strong>d by the von Neumann’s ”statistic” ergodic theorem, which says that<br />
von Neumann “statistic” ergodic theorem. Let U be a unitary operator on a Hilbert space<br />
H, let H U = {v ∈ H s.t. Uv = v} <strong>de</strong>note the closed subspace of those vectors which are fixed by<br />
U, and P U : H → H U <strong>de</strong>note the orthogonal projection onto H U . Then, for any vector v ∈ H we<br />
have<br />
1<br />
n∑<br />
lim<br />
U k v − P<br />
n→∞ ∥<br />
U v∥<br />
= 0<br />
n + 1<br />
k=0<br />
If f : X → X is an en<strong>do</strong>morphism of the probability space (X, E, µ), one can consi<strong>de</strong>r the<br />
“shift” operator U : L 2 (µ) → L 2 (µ) given by (Uϕ) (x) = ϕ (f (x)). It is clearly unitary, its<br />
fixed point set is the space of invariant L 2 -observable. The von Neumann theorem then asserts<br />
convergence of time means ϕ n → ϕ in L 2 (µ). Here, we prove the<br />
∥<br />
H<br />
Birkhoff-Khinchin “individual” ergodic theorem. Let f : X → X be an en<strong>do</strong>morphism<br />
of the probability space (X, E, µ), and let ϕ ∈ L 1 (µ) be an integrable observable. Then the limit<br />
1<br />
ϕ(x) = lim<br />
n→∞ n + 1<br />
n∑<br />
ϕ ( f k (x) )<br />
exists for µ-almost any x ∈ X. Moreover, the observable ϕ is in L 1 (µ), is invariant, and satisfies<br />
∫ ∫<br />
ϕdµ = ϕdµ<br />
k=0