26.10.2013 Views

PERDAS DE SOLO E NUTRIENTES POR EROSÃO HÍDRICA EM ...

PERDAS DE SOLO E NUTRIENTES POR EROSÃO HÍDRICA EM ...

PERDAS DE SOLO E NUTRIENTES POR EROSÃO HÍDRICA EM ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABSTRACT<br />

The overall objective of this work was to evaluate different soil tillage systems to planting<br />

Pinus taeda, related to the process of water erosion, in two plantation areas located in the<br />

northern part of Santa Catarina state, on soils of different texture and slopes. Selected areas<br />

were: Tres Barras County – Argissolo Vermelho Escuro Álico (Ultisol) with a heavy clay<br />

texture and slope between 3 and 5%, and in Itaiopolis County Argissolo Vermelho<br />

Distrófico Típico (Ultisol) with a clay texture and slope between 9 and 12%. The soil and<br />

nutrient losses from each soil tillage system were quantified and soil physical, chemical and<br />

mechanical characteristics from both areas were determined. The following soil tillage<br />

systems (treatments) were tested: “Downslope” – ripping and harrowing on the slope<br />

direction; “Contour planting” – ripping and harrowing in contour; “No tillage” – planting<br />

without soil disturbance; and “Planting spot” – mechanical digging on the planting line. The<br />

experimental plots measuring 20 x 25 m were set up in 2003 and monitored over the period<br />

of one year. Soil and water losses were quantified using a Coshocton wheel type device at<br />

the lower end of each plot. Significant differences were found for soil total, macro- and<br />

micro-porosities from both experimental areas. On both places, soil tillage system<br />

“Downslope” presented the largest soil and nutrient losses. On Itaiopolis experimental area,<br />

“Downslope” system presented soil losses 3.5 times bigger than “Contour planting” and “No<br />

tillage” systems, and twice the losses from “Planting spot” system. On this location, no<br />

critical values for soil physical and mechanical characteristics were obtained. On the Tres<br />

Barras experimental area, soil losses from “Downslope” system presented values around 3.5<br />

times greater than those from “Contour planting” system, 2.5 times the losses presented on<br />

“Planting spot” system and almost 6.5 times the losses from “No tillage” system. On this<br />

spot, soil mechanical resistance showed significant differences due to soil compaction<br />

mainly on the reduced tillage systems. In the Itaiopolis area, it was found that soil tillage<br />

must focused on restraining the water erosive process, while on the Tres Barras area, soil<br />

tillage system most important objective should be reclaiming soil structure.<br />

Key words: reforestation, erosion by water, soil physical characteristics<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!