Miljøvennlig, Økonomisk, Svært Effektiv Energi Ren Teknologi for Fremtiden / Environmentally Friendly, Economical, Highly Efficient Energy Cleantech for the Future

This is an Introduction presentation of various energy related cleaner technologies and information indicating inexhaustible level of energy available from wide range of sources. At most advanced scientific level, the surprising degree of vast low cost energy is already accepted as a physical effect. For example, LENR-Cold Fusion technology's effect itself is in virtual acceptance by Mainstream Western Science and the next step is when the various available commercialized "free energy" generators become officially endorsed by mainstream outlets. And this might trigger a string of other related technologies to be reviewed by mainstream full scientific protocol for the first time for accelerated improvement of human life across the board. This Scientific Investigative Report with Analysis of Commercialized Examples(continuous updating summary) covers conventional low cost energy cleantech, as well as uniquely high efficiency less known technologies that are related to a string of superior effects that can significantly affect the way business, economy, & everyday life would function if fully deployed. This is an Introduction presentation of various energy related cleaner technologies and information indicating inexhaustible level of energy available from wide range of sources. At most advanced scientific level, the surprising degree of vast low cost energy is already accepted as a physical effect.

For example, LENR-Cold Fusion technology's effect itself is in virtual acceptance by Mainstream Western Science and the next step is when the various available commercialized "free energy" generators become officially endorsed by mainstream outlets.
And this might trigger a string of other related technologies to be reviewed by mainstream full scientific protocol for the first time for accelerated improvement of human life across the board.

This Scientific Investigative Report with Analysis of Commercialized Examples(continuous updating summary) covers conventional low cost energy cleantech, as well as uniquely high efficiency less known technologies that are related to a string of superior effects that can significantly affect the way business, economy, & everyday life would function if fully deployed.

NewNatureParadigm
from NewNatureParadigm More from this publisher
27.07.2017 Views

Free Energy Challenge: Quest to Meet Academic Protocol 2: Disadvantage of Researching • ■ Yet s(ll con(nuing system is that “Reputed” labs/schools/publica(ons have strong (e with “reputed = large” scien(st group-NGO-corporate, oDen disallow to test/publish “certain kind of” new science or experiment data as “it would break the law”(Ge Pollack+), ”Blacklisted” academic can be banned from student interac(on at schools, mainstream science journals & conven(ons etc(B Josephson, SarfaQ+) • ■ Most large corporate research/Govn’t div has strains whose member is fully aware of/engaged in physics law breaking performance energy(& other) techs but by secrecy contract(allegedly linked to Na(onal Security status) mainstream academic/media is never officially informed(Rug San(lli, Da Yurth, Myr Evans+): scien(fic corrup(on • ■ Alleged tenured dismissal, facility inaccessibility, faculty/university warned of funding cut if member studies “non-std-science”(B Mar(n, Jo Mack, Delborne, MW Ho, Hal Arp+), ODen at western mainstream level one is paid to study only acceptable topics & not others, or for geopoli*cs study most cri*cal issue to be avoided(Chomsky vs James Tracy): former prof as opposed to la^er one is a more of controlled opposi(on & gate keeper?(Anthony Hall+), science is "policy driven" sponsored by corporate groups(Dav Lewis+) 191 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Free Energy Challenge: Quest to Meet Academic Protocol 3: Peer Review System • ■ Reduced chance for grant/promo2on if contradicts above root assump2ons even though unrelated to research theme, it is par$cularly important to endorse man made exclusive catastrophic CO2 global warming no ma9er what the research is(this automa2cally cuts out funding from good por2on of torsion field/electric weather influence, cosmic ray - troposphere rela2on, general global climate research area), Differs in non-western na$ons(Russia, Brazil+, eg China’s Montagnier funding), or military or space agency in West(seems usually classified) • • Self-endorsed circular logic; underfunded experimental research success & theory, even validated by many "fringe groups" & non mainstream journal peer reviews, is blocked from mainstream peer review without Western corporate-NGO/media/gov’ back up, but mainstream rejects it, reasoning “it lacks peer review”, • • This combines with occasional selec2ve failure only peer reviews when claims are “proven false” & claimers lose funding/job, by only based on replica/on failures & ignored all successes(Mi Schiff+). This stops most researches, but even failure process itself is dubious; eg. Firmly alleged data change to block LENR funding(Mallove+) 192 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Free <strong>Energy</strong> Challenge: Quest to Meet Academic<br />

Protocol 3: Peer Review System<br />

• ■ Reduced chance <strong>for</strong> grant/promo2on if contradicts above root assump2ons<br />

even though unrelated to research <strong>the</strong>me, it is par$cularly important to<br />

endorse man made exclusive catastrophic CO2 global warming no ma9er<br />

what <strong>the</strong> research is(this automa2cally cuts out funding from good por2on of<br />

torsion field/electric wea<strong>the</strong>r influence, cosmic ray - troposphere rela2on,<br />

general global climate research area), Differs in non-western na$ons(Russia,<br />

Brazil+, eg China’s Montagnier funding), or military or space agency in<br />

West(seems usually classified)<br />

• • Self-endorsed circular logic; underfunded experimental research success &<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory, even validated by many "fringe groups" & non mainstream journal<br />

peer reviews, is blocked from mainstream peer review without Western<br />

corporate-NGO/media/gov’ back up, but mainstream rejects it, reasoning “it<br />

lacks peer review”,<br />

• • This combines with occasional selec2ve failure only peer reviews when<br />

claims are “proven false” & claimers lose funding/job, by only based on<br />

replica/on failures & ignored all successes(Mi Schiff+). This stops most<br />

researches, but even failure process itself is dubious; eg. Firmly alleged data<br />

change to block LENR funding(Mallove+)<br />

192<br />

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty <strong>Cleantech</strong> Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!