SAS - Norsk Flytekniker Organisasjon

what we have suggested. ThaJJMB heavily oppose thisposition - we are the bodyresponsible to developmaintenance requirementsfor all operators, the OPSCommittee should confinethemselves to the operationalrequirements. Thisconflict has stalled theprogress of the whole JAROPS1, and has to be settledby the JMC or eventuallythe JAAC. A NPA for theentire regulations cannotbe expected ready beforemid-1993, at the earliest.1) JAR 65 requirements forthe "non-certifying"base technicians.2) Examination for all"certifying staff" byindependent bodies.3) Issuance of a "JAA BasicLicense" as the bottomline for "non-certi fyingstaff" with "~atings"endorsed as for"certifying sta£ fr'.4) Adoption of the EuropeanStandard for NDT - EN473- as a JAA Regulation.The above items are vitalto future of the licensedengineers, unfortunately'none of the other JJMB-membersshare our views here,a satisfactory solution canonly be found outside theJJMB. I therefore urge theAEI Annua1 Congress to addressthis situation andcome up with an (for allaffiliates concerned)agreeable strategy and toplan a campaign on lobbyingthe respective JAA Authorities.FOREIGN SOURCED MAINTENANCEAfter 1st January 1994 allmaintenance and repair workperformed on JAA registeredJAR 65 CERTIFYING STAFFThe JAR-65 WG'S first drafthas been circulated to allaircraft must be performedby a JAR 145'approved organisation-Thls has led toaffiliates, the second a number af continuingdraft was promised ready concerns fram manufacturforthe September JJMB- ers, vendars and rnaintenmeetingin Brussels, but ance organisatione locatedhas now been postponed to outside the JAA territortheNovember-meeting in le&, and the JJMB farined ;lHoofddorp. The J&R 10 ta Look inta the pro-Reference %n%X Chabd~an blem~, The m's repork waswill discuss different pxedt?rzz%& at the Last JJMBaspectsof the draft meeiing in September 'andproposal in his Report to have ' been distx'ihuted tothe AC, so 1'11 only the JAR Reference Panelmention the most important Chairman and the AEI EB forsubjects we are concen- comments. The preferredtrating on at this stage: options from the WG contained3 main principles,namel y ;1) Bilateral TechnicalAgreement or MOU.2) JAR-145 Approval to anon-JAA Organisation.3) Subcontracting Acc. toJAR 145.75 b)Bilateral Agreements arebetween States, and theJAA/NAA will audit theaviation system of theactual country before sucha Bilateral can be signed.Thereafter each JAA memberstate can sign thisBilateral when or if neededby industry A similarIsmall JAA/NAA team willaudit the 145 applicantbefore the Approvel isgranted - but when such anon-JAA company is approvedaccording to JAR 145, it isentitled to receive automaticacceptance, withoutany further technicalinvestigation, by all otherJAA-NAA'S (from January 1st1994).SUMMARYThe European CommunityCommission (ECC) adopted aregulation last December,incorporating existingJAR's into EC law, and allfuture JAR's are expectedto similary incorporation.The ITF is represented inBrussels and "looks after"the EC Transport Commission- they have now shown comeinterest to join the JJMBin order k~ look after theJAR 65. rehe AEI posikion isthak iE 17'3' 59 goirig to sitin the JJMB, we want to seean active, certifyingengineer representing them,and not an ITF officer fromthe London office However,none of the other JJMBmemberswere inclined toaccept the ITF and theywill probably stay out.Based on the foregoing andrealizing that especiallythe JAR 65 will not go ourway in the JJMB, it is mostimportant to establish acooperation with the ITF inorder to coordinate positionsand lobbying on boththe JAA Authorities and ECbodies. Possibilities andoptions should be properlyaddressed at this year'sCongress, next year may betoo late.Svein Hansen AEI JJMB Rep.-12 INFO 4/92