21.03.2014 Views

Last ned 3/2011 - Kirurgen.no

Last ned 3/2011 - Kirurgen.no

Last ned 3/2011 - Kirurgen.no

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MINImalt INVASIV KIRURGI<br />

Bilde 2 og 3. Begge bildene er fra samme laparoskopiske binyreoperasjon på FOR, som er dedikert<br />

forskning og utvikling. Legg spesielt merke til høyre overarm som løftes samt instrumentet i<br />

høyre neve hvor tommelen aktiverer tuppen på instrumentet mens på bilde 2 er det pekefingeren<br />

som aktiverer instrumentet. Diatermiledningen på Volargrip tilkobles instrumentet slik at den ikke<br />

kommer i veien for kirurgens hender.<br />

beskrevet i andre studier (1.3, 6, 8, 9, 11,<br />

13, 15, 16, 25). Det ovenfor nevnte gir<br />

oss middelaldrende kirurger mulighet<br />

til et positivt syn på fremtiden. Det er<br />

for øvrig viktig at ergo<strong>no</strong>mien i hele<br />

operasjonsstuen blir vurdert for å få en<br />

funksjonell enhet.<br />

Fremtidens operasjonsrom<br />

Før byggingen av St Olavs Hospital ble<br />

det , under ledelse av professor Hans<br />

Olav Myhre, opprettet to eksperimentelle<br />

operasjonsstuer, kalt Fremtidens<br />

Operasjonsrom (FOR). Disse hadde til<br />

hensikt å forbedre sykehusets nye operasjonsstuer<br />

og dermed minske risikoen<br />

for å bringe foreldet tankegods inn i<br />

de nye stuene. Dette har vi til en stor<br />

grad lyktes med takket være industrien,<br />

Helsebygg, NTNU og Sintef som alle har<br />

vært aktive deltagere i dette prosjektet.<br />

På bilde 3 ses den ferdige operasjonsstuen<br />

for laparoskopi ved FOR. Den er<br />

spesialdesignet for laparoskopi og avansert<br />

fleksibel endoskopi, men er også<br />

godt egnet til åpen kirurgi.<br />

Surgitech har nå utviklet et komplett<br />

sett av instrumenter, inklusive trokarer,<br />

for de vanligste laparoskopiske<br />

prosedyrene. Instrumentene har CEgodkjenning<br />

og selges allerede i flere<br />

europeiske land samt i Sør-Korea og<br />

Kina. Foreløpig er det ingen markedsføring<br />

eller forhandlere av instrumentene<br />

i Skandinavia og interesserte må<br />

derfor ta direkte kontakt med Surgitech<br />

Norway for tilbud •<br />

Referanser<br />

1 Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith DW (2001) The effect<br />

of laparoscopic instrument working angle on<br />

surgeons‘upper extremity workload. Surg Endosc<br />

15:1027-1029.<br />

2 Berguer R, Gerber S, Kilpatrick G, Remler M, Beckley<br />

D (1999) A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle<br />

electromyographic reponses to the use of laparoscopic<br />

instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp.<br />

Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics 42:1634-1645.<br />

3 Berguer R, Gerber S, Kilpatrik G, Beckley D (1998) An<br />

ergo<strong>no</strong>mic comparison of inline vs pistol-grip handle<br />

configuration in a laparoscopic grasper. Surg Endosc<br />

12:805-808.<br />

4 Delagi EF, Iazetti J, Perotto A, Morrison D (1989)<br />

Elektromyographie der Extremitäten Ferdinand Enke<br />

Verlag, Stuttgart.<br />

5 Emam TA, Frank TG, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2001)<br />

Influence of handle design on the surgeon’s upper limb<br />

movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during<br />

endoscopic suturing. Surg Endosc 15(7):667-672.<br />

6 Emam TA, Frank TG, Hanna GB, Stockham G, Cuschieri<br />

A (1999) Rocker handle for endoscopic needle drivers:<br />

technical and ergo<strong>no</strong>mic evaluation by infrared motion<br />

analysis. Surg Endosc 13(7):658-661.<br />

7 EN IEC 62366 – Ed. 1.0 – Medical devices – Application<br />

of usability engineering to medical devices. IEC<br />

Geneva (2007) Beuth Verlag, Berlin.<br />

8 Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Optimal port<br />

locations for endoscopic intracorporal k<strong>no</strong>tting. Surg<br />

Endosc 11(4):397-401.<br />

9 Horgan LF, O'Riordan DC, Doctor N: Neurapraxia<br />

following laparoscopic procedures: an occupational<br />

hazard. Min Invas Ther Allied Tech<strong>no</strong>l 1997; 6: 33–5.<br />

vgl. 20. Ka<strong>no</strong> N, Kasugai H, Yamakawa T: Laparoscopic<br />

surgeon's thumb. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 1172<br />

10 ISO/IEC 25062 (2006) Software engineering - Software<br />

product Quality Requirements and Evaluation<br />

(SQuaRE) - Common Industry Format (CIF) for usability<br />

test reports. Beuth Verlag, Berlin.<br />

11 Ka<strong>no</strong> N., Kasugai H., Yamakawa T. (1993) Laparoscopic<br />

surgeon’s thumb. Arch Surg 128: 1172<br />

12 Lewis JR (1991) Psychometric evaluation of an afterscenario<br />

questionnaire for computer usability studies.<br />

IGCHI Bulletin 23(1):78-81.<br />

13 Lotz JC: The suffering surgeon. Surg Endosc 1997; 11:<br />

548<br />

14 Majeed AW, Jacob G, Reed MW, Johnson AG:<br />

Laparoscopist's thumb: an occupational hazard? Arch<br />

Surg 1993; 128: 357. Van der Zee DC, Bax NMA: Digital<br />

nerve compression due to laparoscopic surgery.<br />

15 Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Faist M (2001)<br />

Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic Aspects of Different Handles for Minimally<br />

Invasive Surgery – An EMG based Study. Proceedings<br />

of the Human Factors and Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics Society 45th<br />

Annual Meeting, pp 1269-1273.<br />

16 Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Faist M (2001)<br />

Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic aspects of different handles for minimally<br />

invasive surgery—an EMG-based study. Proceedings<br />

of the Human Factors and Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics. Proceedings<br />

of the Human Factors and Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics Society 45th<br />

Annual Meeting, pp 1269–1273.<br />

17 Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Waller P, Faist<br />

M (2002) Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic Aspects of Four Different Types<br />

of Laparoscopic Instrument Handles with Respect to<br />

Elbow Angle – an EMG based Study. Surg Endosc<br />

16:1528-1532.<br />

18 Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Waller P, Faist<br />

M (2002) Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic aspects of four different types of<br />

laparoscopic instrument handles with respect to elbow<br />

angle—an EMG-based study. Surg Endosc 16:1528–<br />

1532.<br />

19 Matern U, Kuttler G, Giebmeyer C, Waller P, Faist M<br />

(2004) Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic aspects of five different types of<br />

laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic<br />

conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks:<br />

An electromyographic-based study. Surg Endosc<br />

18:1231-1241.<br />

20 Matern U, Waller P, Eichenlaub M, Rückauer KD (1999)<br />

MIS instruments: An experimental comparison of<br />

various laparoscopic handles and their design. Surg<br />

Endosc 13:756-762.<br />

21 Matern U, Waller P, Giebmeyer C, Rückauer KD,<br />

Farthmann EH (2001) Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics: requirements for<br />

adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables.<br />

JSLS 5(1):7-12.<br />

22 Matern U., Koneczny S.: Ergebnisse der Umfrage zu<br />

den Arbeitsbedingungen im OP auf dem Deutschen<br />

Chirurgenkongress 2004. In: Zentralbl Chir 131: 393-<br />

400 (2006)<br />

23 Matern U., Waller P. (1999) Instruments for Minimally<br />

Invasive Surgery: Principles of Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic Handles.<br />

Surgical Endoscopy 13: 174-182<br />

24 MDD, the Medical Device Directive 2007/47/EG<br />

25 Melzer A. (1996) Endoscopic instruments –<br />

conventional and intelligent. In: Endosurgery. Hrsg.:<br />

Touli J., Hunter J., Gossot D.; Churchill Livingston,<br />

New York; S. 69-95<br />

26 Mueller LP. (1993) Laparoscopic instrument grips. An<br />

ergo<strong>no</strong>mic approach. Surg Endosc 7: 465-466<br />

27 Büchel.D, Mårvik.R, Hallabrin.B, Matern.U Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics<br />

of disposable handels for minimally invasive surgery.<br />

Surg Endosc (2010) 24:992-1004<br />

206 <strong>Kirurgen</strong> nr. 3, <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!