08.08.2013 Views

SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET - Epsilon Open Archive - SLU

SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET - Epsilon Open Archive - SLU

SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET - Epsilon Open Archive - SLU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60<br />

-, Different approaches for calculating tissue parameters from pressure<br />

volume curves have lately been outlined and discussed by Kikuta and<br />

Richter (1986) and Stadelmann (1984). The advantage of the pressure<br />

volUIne method is that apoplastic water does not interfere in the determination<br />

of l/J 7r and also the elasticity of the tissue can be quantified. An<br />

useful ecological interpretation of pressure volume curves is given by Jane<br />

and Green (1983) and Bannister (1986).<br />

Measurement of stornatal conductance and gas exchange<br />

The epidermis of leaves creating the boundary between le af interior and<br />

the atmosphere is covered by a relatively impermeable cuticle except at<br />

stomata openings through which gases (C0 2 and water vapour) mainly<br />

exchange between the leaf interior and the atmosphere. When water<br />

deficits develops in the leaves the turgor regulated stornatal cells close with<br />

the consequent reduction in transpiration and CO 2 uptake. Thus it is<br />

important to measure stornatal opening directly from stornatal impressions<br />

or by measuring the rate of gas exchange.<br />

Stornatal impressions can be obtained by applying a quick - drying<br />

substance to the leaf surface followed by microscopic countings and<br />

measurements of stornatal opening on the impressions (Rice et al., 1979).<br />

Stornatal opening can be converted into diffusive resistance (Meidner and<br />

Mansfield, 1968).<br />

Stornatal conductance can be calculated from measurements of water<br />

vapour loss in leaf chambers under laboratory conditions (Sestak et al.,<br />

1971). However, for field conditions more simple portable technique is<br />

required in order to obtain many determinations and hereby reduce the<br />

statistical uncertainty. This claim has been met by the introduction of<br />

diffusive porometers and most work on stornatal resistance is now carried<br />

out with such porometers based on a electronic moisture - sensor system.<br />

These instruments measure the diffusion of water vapour away from the<br />

leaf and are of two basic types the "transient" and "steady state" porometer.<br />

In both types the leaf is enclosed in a cuvette which may be ventilated.<br />

Ventilation reduces the boundary resistance layer to a low value. However,<br />

ventilation may increase the evaporative loss and induce stornatal closure.<br />

Non -ventilated transient porometers are relatively cheap and instruments<br />

are commercially available (e.g. "Delta T Automatic Porometer Mk III",<br />

Delta-T Devices, Cambridge, U.K.).<br />

In steady state porometers, which are always ventilated, the relative<br />

humidity is maintained at or near ambient humidity. Stornatal resistance<br />

is derived either from the increase in humidity in the air passing the leaf<br />

or from the rate of inflow of dry air needed to maintain a constant<br />

humidity. These instruments are also commercially available (e.g. "LI -1600<br />

Steady State Porometer", LiCor Inc.).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!