19.01.2013 Views

Jaarboek no. 89. 2010/2011 - Koninklijke Maatschappij voor ...

Jaarboek no. 89. 2010/2011 - Koninklijke Maatschappij voor ...

Jaarboek no. 89. 2010/2011 - Koninklijke Maatschappij voor ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Natuurkundige <strong>voor</strong>drachten I Nieuwe reeks 89<br />

Multi-scale modellering <strong>voor</strong> gasstromen beladen met deeltjes<br />

70<br />

Figure 4<br />

Computed bubble formation in a pseudo 2D gas-fluidized bed with a central jet. Bed material: ballotini with<br />

dp =500 µm and ρs =2660 kg/m3 . Jet velocity: 10.0 m/s (40 times the minimum fluidization velocity umf ).<br />

fluidized bed reactors (diameter 5 meters, height<br />

16 meters) are still beyond its capabilities. However,<br />

it is possible to introduce yet a<strong>no</strong>ther upscaling by<br />

considering the bubbles, as observed in the DPM<br />

and TFM models of gas-fluidized beds, as discrete<br />

entities. This is the so-called discrete bubble model,<br />

which has been succesfully applied in the field of<br />

gas-liquid bubble columns (Del<strong>no</strong>ij et al., 1997). The<br />

idea to apply this model to describe the large scale<br />

solids circulation that prevail in gas-solid reactors is<br />

new, however. In this paper, we want to show some<br />

first results of the discrete bubble model applied<br />

to gas-solid systems, which involves some slight<br />

modifications of the equivalent model for gas-liquid<br />

systems. To this end the emulsion phase is modeled<br />

as a continuum (like the liquid in a gas-liquid bubble<br />

column) and the larger bubbles are treated as<br />

discrete bubbles. Note that granular systems have<br />

<strong>no</strong> surface tension, so in that respect there is a pro<strong>no</strong>unced<br />

difference with the bubbles present in gas-<br />

liquid bubble columns. For instance, the gas will be<br />

free to flow through a bubble in the gas-solid systems,<br />

which is <strong>no</strong>t the case for gas-liquid systems.<br />

As far as the numerical part is concerned, the DBM<br />

strongly resembles the discrete particle model as<br />

outlined in section 3, since it is also of the Euler-<br />

Lagrange type with the emulsion phase described<br />

by the volume-averaged Navier-Stokes equations:<br />

∂<br />

(ε r ) + ∇ • ε r u → = 0 (16)<br />

∂t<br />

∂<br />

(ε r u →<br />

) + ∇ • ε r u→ u → = - ε ∇p-∇ • εst = - S →<br />

+ε r g →<br />

(17)<br />

∂t<br />

whereas the discrete bubbles are tracked individu-<br />

ally according to Newton’s second law of motion:<br />

dv → b<br />

mb = F →<br />

tot<br />

(18)<br />

dt<br />

where F →<br />

tot is the sum of different forces acting on a<br />

single bubble:<br />

= F→ + F→ + F→ + F→ L+ F →<br />

VM<br />

(19)<br />

F →<br />

tot<br />

g<br />

d<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!