23.05.2022 Views

Th&ma 2022-1

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TH MA themahogeronderwijs.org

freedom and other fundamental values in higher education

come up in debates.

But is it true that we should not be concerned? The short

answer is no. Our false sense of security comes from two

false impressions: (1) that infringements on fundamental

values in higher education only occur in non-democratic

states and (2) a narrow conception of Europe that leads us to

forget we operate in the broader EHEA.

First, respect for fundamental values in higher education

is not only a problem of non-democratic states, but also of

democracies. In Turkey, there are reports of ‘torture, prison

and job dismissals to silence academia’. In Hungary, gender

studies as a programme of study was denied accreditation

because it does not produce the right kind of knowledge, the

parliament voted to transfer control of 11 state universities

to foundations led by allies of prime minister Viktor Orbán,

and other universities had their autonomy revoked (as is the

case of University of Theater and Film Arts) or were threatened

with closure and had to move (as is the case of Central

European University). Even in the Netherlands, research

from ScienceGuide indicated that around 43 per cent of scientists

received threats after making a public appearance.

These examples are just the tip of the iceberg. Infringements

on fundamental values have been increasingly

reported in advanced democracies such as France or the

United Kingdom, warranting the conclusion that ‘democracy

is in recession, academic freedom is in danger’. Even

if you find such headlines exaggerated, the COVID-19 pandemic

has made it blatantly obvious that there is an erosion

of respect for expertise.

Second, the false sense of security when it comes to respect

for fundamental values comes from a narrow conception

of Europe. The European Higher Education Area, an outcome

of the intergovernmental Bologna Process started in

1999, currently has 49 member states. Its borders extend

from Reykjavik to Vladivostok and from North Cape to

Ankara. In the EHEA we have set up a common structure

of degrees and adopted common standards and guidelines

for quality assurance to make our higher education systems

In Turkey, there are

reports of ‘torture,

prison and job dismissals

to silence academia’

‘Problems of academic

freedom or institutional

autonomy do not

stay within borders’

more compatible and comparable. All with the purpose

‘to increase staff and students’ mobility and to facilitate

employability’, as the landing page of the EHEA reminds

us. And we are sending our staff and students abroad in

higher education systems that do not get an A on academic

freedom and are thereby potentially putting them at risk.

When we engage in transnational collaboration through

teaching, learning, research, or institutional partnerships,

we are supposed to take notice of realities across the EHEA,

and then they are not so far anymore but at arm’s length.

Problems of academic freedom or institutional autonomy do

not stay within borders, they spill over. Think of the return

of ‘flying universities’ that first appeared in 19th-century

Poland. In recent years, universities such as the Central

European University and the European Humanities University

have had to move to other EHEA member countries

after being ousted from Hungary and Belarus, respectively.

Think of institutional partnerships we develop with universities

that operate in countries where academic freedom

and integrity are not a reality. Think of Russia’s invasion of

Ukraine and the manifold repercussions this has had on the

academic community and all aspects of higher education

cooperation.

These examples show that we need to understand academic

freedom, and other fundamental values, in a wider reference

framework than the national context. And we have

seen that the Bologna Process has taken up this task and

there has been a joint statement on the need to develop

a common reference framework for conceptualising and

monitoring fundamental values in the EHEA. For this purpose,

a task force on monitoring fundamental values in the

EHEA has been set up.

(In)direct link

As explained above, the 2020 Rome Communiqué made

a direct link between fundamental values and quality in

higher education, arguing that respect for fundamental

values is a necessary condition for quality learning, teaching

and research – thereby, indirectly linking quality assurance

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!