Th&ma 2022-1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TH MA themahogeronderwijs.org
Blom, R., Borst, R.T. & Voorn, B. (2021). Pathology or inconvenience? A meta-analysis
of the impact of red tape on people and organizations. Review of Public Personnel
Administration, 41(4), 623-650.
Boardman, C. & Sundquist, E. (2009). Toward understanding work motivation: Worker
attitudes and the perception of effective public service. The American Review of Public
Administration, 39(5), 519-535.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Bozeman, B. & Youtie, J. (2020). Robotic bureaucracy: Administrative burden and red tape
in university research. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 157-162.
Chen, C.X., Lill, J.B. & Vance, T.W. (2020). Management control system design and
employees’ autonomous motivation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 32(3),
71-91.
Choi, S. & Chun, Y.H. (2021). Accountability and organizational performance in the public
sector: Analysis of higher education institutions in Korea. Public Administration, 99(2),
353-370.
Cooke, D.K., Brant, K.K. & Woods, J.M. (2019). The role of public service motivation in
employee work engagement: A test of the job demands-resources model. International
Journal of Public Administration, 42(9), 765-775.
Czarniawska, B. (2019). Virtual red tape, or digital v. paper bureaucracy. In: B. Czarniawska
& O. Löfgren (red.), Overwhelmed by overflows?: How people and organizations create and
manage excess (pp. 170-190). Lund: Lund University Press.
Decramer, A., De Rynck, F., Dewaele, J. & Wayenberg, E. (2013). Planlast in het hoger
onderwijs. Th&ma Hoger Onderwijs, 2013-4, 20-27.
Decramer, A., Smolders, C., Vanderstraeten, A. & Christiaens, J. (2012). The impact of
institutional pressures on employee performance management systems in higher
education in the low countries. British Journal of Management, 23, S88-S103.
DeHart-Davis, L., Davis, R.S. & Mohr, Z. (2015). Green tape and job satisfaction: Can
organizational rules make employees happy?. Journal of Public Administration Research
and Theory, 25(3), 849-876.
Europese Commissie (2022). European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles for the
Digital Decade. Geraadpleegd op 11 maart 2022 via digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/
library/declaration-european-digital-rights-and-principles
Fateh, A., Mustamil, N. & Aslam, M.Z. (2020). Linking Authentic Leadership and Employee
Creative Behavior: the Mediating Role of Autonomous Motivation and Job Complexity.
Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 59-74.
Fernet, C., Gillet, N., Austin, S., Trépanier, S.G. & Drouin-Rousseau, S. (2021). Predicting
nurses’ occupational commitment and turnover intention: The role of autonomous
motivation and supervisor and coworker behaviors. Journal of Nursing Management
29(8), 2611-2619.
Gagné, M. & Deci, E.L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
George, B., Pandey, S.K., Steijn, B., Decramer, A. & Audenaert, M. (2021). Red Tape,
Organizational Performance, and Employee Outcomes: Meta-analysis, Meta-regression,
and Research Agenda. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 638-651.
Jungert, T., Schattke, K., Proulx, F.A., Taylor, G. & Koestner, R. (2021). Whose autonomy
support is more effective? Managers’ or Co-Workers’? An experimental comparison
of source and occupational context on intrinsic motivation. Canadian Journal of
Administrative Sciences, 38(2), 209-223.
Kim, S., Paik, W. & Lee, C. (2014). Does bureaucracy facilitate the effect of information
technology (IT)?. International Review of Public Administration, 19(3), 219-237.
Knies, E., Boselie, P., Gould-Williams, J. & Vandenabeele, W. (2018). Strategic human
resource management and public sector performance: context matters. The International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-13.
Knies, E. & Leisink, P. (2014). Leadership behavior in public organizations: A study of
supervisory support by police and medical center middle managers. Review of Public
Personnel Administration, 34(2), 108-127.
Lu, H., Zhao, Y. & While, A. (2019). Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A literature
review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 94, 21-31.
Maden-Eyiusta, C. (2021). Role conflict, role ambiguity, and proactive behaviors:
Does flexible role orientation moderate the mediating impact of engagement? The
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(13), 2829-2855.
Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance,
and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents,
correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
Moynihan, D.P., Wright, B.E. & Pandey, S.K. (2012). Working within constraints:
Can transformational leaders alter the experience of red tape? International Public
Management Journal, 15(3), 315-336.
Muylaert, J., Bauwens, R., Audenaert, M. & Decramer, A. (2022). Reducing Red Tape’s
Negative Consequences for Leaders: The Buffering Role of Autonomous Motivation.
Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 806388.
Muylaert, J., Audenaert, M. & Decramer, A. (in voorbereiding). How Leader’s Red Tape
Interacts with Employees’ Red Tape from the Lens of the Job Demands-Resources
Model. Review of Public Personnel Administration.
Muylaert, J., Audenaert, M. & Decramer, A. Linking Red Tape to Teachers’ Affective
Commitment: A Serial Mediation Model (Working paper).
Ogonek, N. & Hofmann, S. (2018). Governments’ Need for Digitization Skills:
Understanding and Shaping Vocational Training in the Public Sector. International
Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 5(4), 61-75.
Orgambídez, A. & Almeida, H. (2020). Supervisor support and affective organizational
commitment: The mediator role of work engagement. Western Journal of Nursing
Research, 42(3), 187-193.
Pandey, S.K. & Wright, B.E. (2006). Connecting the dots in public management: Political
environment, organizational goal ambiguity, and the public manager’s role ambiguity.
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 511-532.
Quratulain, S. & Khan, A.K. (2015). Red Tape, Resigned Satisfaction, Public Service
Motivation, and Negative Employee Attitudes and Behaviors: Testing a Model of
Moderated Mediation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(4), 307-332.
Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. & Bakker, A.B. (2002). The measurement
of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach.
Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Thielgen, M.M., Krumm, S., Rauschenbach, C. & Hertel, G. (2015). Older but wiser: Age
moderates congruency effects between implicit and explicit motives on job satisfaction.
Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 182-200.
Trépanier, S.G., Fernet, C. & Austin, S. (2013). The moderating role of autonomous
motivation in the job demands-strain relation: A two sample study. Motivation and
Emotion, 37(1), 93-105.
Tummers, L. & Den Dulk, L. (2013). The effects of work alienation on organisational
commitment, work effort and work-to-family enrichment. Journal of Nursing
Management, 21(6), 850-859.
Vandercammen, L., Hofmans, J. & Theuns, P. (2014). The mediating role of affect in
the relationship between need satisfaction and autonomous motivation. Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 62-79.
Walker, R.M. & Brewer, G.A. (2008). An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants
of red tape in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1112-1127.
Walker, R.M. & Brewer, G. A. (2009). Can management strategy minimize the impact of red
tape on organizational performance? Administration & Society, 41(4), 423-448.
Willem, A., Buelens, M. & De Jonghe, I. (2007). Impact of organizational structure on
nurses’ job satisfaction: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies,
44(6), 1011-1020.
Wright, B.E. & Davis, B.S. (2003). Job satisfaction in the public sector: The role of the
environment. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 70-90.
35