<strong>Bechsteins</strong> vleermuiz<strong>en</strong> <strong>en</strong> <strong>franjestaart</strong><strong>en</strong> <strong>op</strong> <strong>en</strong> <strong>rond</strong> <strong>landgoed</strong> Eer<strong>de</strong>Kerth G, Mayer F, König G (2000) Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) reveals that femaleBechstein’s bats live in closed societies. Molecular Ecology 9:793-800.Kerth G, Wagner M, König G (2001a) Roosting together, foraging apart: informationtransfer about food is unlikely to explain sociality in female Bechstein’s bats(Myotis bechsteinii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2001) 50:283-291.Kerth G, Weissmann K, König G (2001b) Day roost selection in female Bechstein’sbats (Myotis bechsteinii): a field experim<strong>en</strong>t to <strong>de</strong>termine the influ<strong>en</strong>ce of roosttemperature. Oecologia 126:1-9.Kerth G, Mayer F, Petit E (2002a) Extreme sex-biased dispersal in the communallybreeding, nonmigratory Bechstein’s bat (Myotis bechsteinii). Molecular Ecology11: 1491-1498.Kerth G, Safi K, König B (2002b) Mean colony relatedness is a poor predictor ofcolony structure and female phil<strong>op</strong>atry in the communally breeding Bechstein’sbat (Myotis bechsteinii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:203-210.Kerth G, Kiefer A, Trapmann C, Weishaar M (2003) High g<strong>en</strong>e diversity at swarmingsites suggest hot spots for g<strong>en</strong>e flow in the <strong>en</strong>dangered Bechstein’s bat.Conservation G<strong>en</strong>etics 4:491-499.Kerth G, Reckardt K (2003). Information transfer about roosts in female Bechstein’sbats: an experim<strong>en</strong>tal field study. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:511-515.Kerth G, Morf L (2004) Behavioural and G<strong>en</strong>etic Data Suggest that Bechstein’s BatsPredominantly Mate Outsi<strong>de</strong> the Breeding Habitat. Ethology 110:987-999.Korst<strong>en</strong> E (2005). Gevond<strong>en</strong>: Eerste zomerverblijfplaats van <strong>franjestaart</strong><strong>en</strong> in Noord-Brabant. http://www.<strong>vleermuis</strong>.net/nieuws/nieuws2005/050124.html.Lauf<strong>en</strong>s G (1973) Beiträge zur Biologie <strong>de</strong>r Franz<strong>en</strong>fle<strong>de</strong>rmäuse (Myotis nattereri,Kuhl 1818). Z. Säugetierkun<strong>de</strong> 38:1-14.Limp<strong>en</strong>s HJGA (2003). <strong>De</strong> Boer <strong>op</strong> voor <strong>de</strong> <strong>franjestaart</strong>! Zoogdier 14(2).Lina PHC (1997) <strong>Bechsteins</strong> <strong>vleermuis</strong> Myotis bechsteinii (Kuhl, 1817) In: Limp<strong>en</strong>sH, Mostert K, Bongers W (1997) Atlas van <strong>de</strong> Ne<strong>de</strong>rlandse vleermuiz<strong>en</strong>, KNNVuitgeverij.Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W, Kryštufek B, Reijn<strong>de</strong>rs PJH,Spetz<strong>en</strong>berger F, Stubbe M, Thiss<strong>en</strong> JBM, Vohralík V, Zima J (1999) The atlas ofEur<strong>op</strong>ean mammals. T & AD Poyser Ltd, London, UK.Palmans G (2001) Vleermuiz<strong>en</strong>vangst<strong>en</strong> in <strong>de</strong> mergelgroev<strong>en</strong> van Limburg. Zoogdier12(3): 21-24.Parsons KN, Jones G (2003) Dispersion and habitat use by Myotis daub<strong>en</strong>tonii andMyotis nattereri during the swarming season: implications for conservation.Animal Conservation 6:283–290.Parsons KN, Jones G, Davidson-Watts I, Gre<strong>en</strong>away F (2003) Swarming of bats atun<strong>de</strong>rground sites in Britain—implications for conservation. BiologicalConservation 111:63-70.Reckardt K, Kerth G (2006) The reproductive success of the parasitic bat fly Basilianana (Diptera: Nycteribiidae) is affected by the low roost fi<strong>de</strong>lity of its host, theBechstein’s bat (Myotis bechsteinii). Parasitol Res 98:237-243.Rivers NM, Butlin RK, Altringham JD (2005) G<strong>en</strong>etic p<strong>op</strong>ulation structure ofNatterer’s bats explained by mating at swarming sites and phil<strong>op</strong>atry. MolecularEcology 14:4299–4312.Rivers NM, Butlin RK, Altringham JD (2006) Autumn swarming behaviour ofNatterer’s bats in the UK: P<strong>op</strong>ulation size, catchm<strong>en</strong>t area and dispersal.Biological conservation 127:215-226.40
<strong>Bechsteins</strong> vleermuiz<strong>en</strong> <strong>en</strong> <strong>franjestaart</strong><strong>en</strong> <strong>op</strong> <strong>en</strong> <strong>rond</strong> <strong>landgoed</strong> Eer<strong>de</strong>Schober W, Grimmberger E (1998) Gids van <strong>de</strong> Vleermuiz<strong>en</strong> van Eur<strong>op</strong>a.Ne<strong>de</strong>rlandse vertaling Lina, P. 2001. Tirion, Baarn.Shiel CB, McAney CM, and Fairley JS (1991) Analysis of the diet of Natterer's batMyotis nattereri and the common long-eared bat Plecotus auritus in the West ofIreland. J.Zool. 223:299-305.Siemers BM, Kaipf I, Schnitzler HU (1999) The use of daily roosts and foraginggrounds by Natterer’s bats (Myotis nattereri Kuhl, 1818) from a colony insouthern Germany. Z Säugetierkun<strong>de</strong> 64:241–245Siemers BM, Schnitzler HU (2000) Natterer’s bat (Myotis nattereri Kuhl, 1818)hawks for prey close to vegetation using echolocation signals of very broadbandwidth. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2000) 47:400–412.Siemers BM, Swift SM (2006) Differ<strong>en</strong>ces in s<strong>en</strong>sory ecology contribute to resourcepartitioning in the bats Myotis bechsteinii and Myotis nattereri (Chir<strong>op</strong>tera:Vespertilionidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:373–380.Smith PG, Racey PA (2005) The itinerant Natterer: physical and thermalcharacteristics of summer roosts of Myotis nattereri (Mammalia: Chir<strong>op</strong>tera). J.Zool., Lond. 266:171–180.Spoelstra K, Douma T (2004) Verhuis je <strong>franjestaart</strong>je. Zoogdier 15(2): 3-7.Spoelstra K, Ri<strong>en</strong>ks F, Janss<strong>en</strong> R, Tuitert D (2004). <strong>Bechsteins</strong>week<strong>en</strong>d 2003.Rapport VZZ-VWG, 19 p.Swift SM (1997) Roosting and foraging behaviour of Natterer’s bats (Myotis nattereriKuhl, 1818) close to the northern bor<strong>de</strong>r of their distribution. J Zool Lond242:375–384.Swift SM (2001) Growth rate and <strong>de</strong>vel<strong>op</strong>m<strong>en</strong>t in infant Natterer's bats (Myotisnattereri) reared in a flight room. Acta Chir<strong>op</strong>terologica 3(2):217-223.Swift SM, Racey PA (2002) Gleaning as a foraging strategy in Natterer’s bat Myotisnattereri. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2002) 52:408–416.Trappmann C (2005). Die Frans<strong>en</strong>fle<strong>de</strong>rmaus <strong>de</strong>r Westfälisch<strong>en</strong> Bucht. Laur<strong>en</strong>tiVerlag, 120 pp.Verhegg<strong>en</strong>, LSGM (1995) Bijzon<strong>de</strong>re waarneming<strong>en</strong>, aflevering 1.Vleermuiswerkgroep Ne<strong>de</strong>rland Nieuwsbrief 7(22):7.Verhegg<strong>en</strong> LSGM (1999) Zomervondst van e<strong>en</strong> <strong>Bechsteins</strong> <strong>vleermuis</strong> Myotisbechsteinii in Rimburg (Ne<strong>de</strong>rlands Limburg). Lutra 41(1-2):25-29.Wolz I (1986) Woch<strong>en</strong>stub<strong>en</strong>-Quartierwechsel bei <strong>de</strong>r Bechsteinfle<strong>de</strong>rmaus.Z. Säugetierk. 51:65-74.Wolz I (1993) Das Beutespektrum <strong>de</strong>r Bechsteinfle<strong>de</strong>rmaus Myotis bechsteini (Kuhl1818) ermittelt aus Kotanalys<strong>en</strong>. Myotis 31:27–68.41