11.07.2015 Views

Rapport Patiëntveiligheid, de rol van de bestuurder - Veilige zorg ...

Rapport Patiëntveiligheid, de rol van de bestuurder - Veilige zorg ...

Rapport Patiëntveiligheid, de rol van de bestuurder - Veilige zorg ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 Prescriptive- How can the results be translated to general strategies that a board canapply to lead patient safety improvements?Methodology – literature research and case study strategyThis research is composed of three parts: a theoretical part, an empiricalpart and a prescriptive part.- For the theoretical part a literature research has been conducted to build anhypothesis on how boards could effectively lead patient safety improvements.- For the empirical part the case study strategy has been used to examinethree cases which were part of the hospital wi<strong>de</strong> patient safety program inthe University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands (UMC Utrecht) inthe period 2003-2006. The strategies used by the board are i<strong>de</strong>ntified andtheir effect is analyzed. Because the direct effect on patient safety couldnot be measured, proxy measures were used (e.g. amount of inci<strong>de</strong>ntsreported, satisfaction of professionals involved, amount of implementedrecommendations). The outcome of the empirical research is compared tothe outcome of the theoretical research.- Based on this outcome, the prescriptive part recommends which strategies aboard can use to lead patient safety improvements.Theory part 1 - The four traits of patient safetyBased on the literature research, four traits have been i<strong>de</strong>ntified that make itdifficult for a board to lead patient safety improvements: visibility, ambiguity,diversity and si<strong>de</strong>-effects of professionalism.VisibilityUnsafety in healthcare often hardly visible. There is almost never a visibledistinction between a patient who has died due to a preventable adverseevent, and any other <strong>de</strong>ceased patient. Even if the problem is recognized onthe individual patient level, the magnitu<strong>de</strong> of the problem can remainhid<strong>de</strong>n for the healthcare professionals involved. Serious adverse events canhave a major emotional impact, but they will often be seen as a freak occurrencerather than a daily problem. This low visibility diminishes the opportunitiesfor learning. It also makes it har<strong>de</strong>r to create a sense of urgency.Safety thus often loses the battle for attention against more visible problemsPatiëntveiligheid, <strong>de</strong> <strong>rol</strong> <strong>van</strong> <strong>de</strong> bestuur<strong>de</strong>r 381

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!