Rapport Patiëntveiligheid, de rol van de bestuurder - Veilige zorg ...
Rapport Patiëntveiligheid, de rol van de bestuurder - Veilige zorg ... Rapport Patiëntveiligheid, de rol van de bestuurder - Veilige zorg ...
- Inbreng;(alle betrokkenen moeten inbreng kunnen geven)- Veiligheid;(deelname moet voor alle betrokkenen veilig zijn)- Druk;(er moet een juiste hoeveelheid druk worden georganiseerd om de voortgangte bewaken)- Ratio;(de uitkomsten moeten inhoudelijk verdedigbaar zijn)- Aansluiting op professionele waarden;(professionals moeten intrinsiek gemotiveerd kunnen worden voor deelname)- Procesondersteuning.(het initiatief en de ondersteuning moeten door het bestuur georganiseerdworden)De bestuurder speelt hierin zelf een essentiële rol en deze is vierledig:- bovengenoemde omstandigheden scheppen waardoor processen kunnenopstarten;- processen bewaken;- uitkomsten van processen beoordelen;- geaccepteerde uitkomsten bekrachtigen en inbedden in de organisatie.Als het bestuur op deze manier leiding geeft aan het verbeteren van depatiëntveiligheid, leveren de zorgprofessionals de inhoudelijke kennis terwijlhet bestuur steeds beter invulling kan geven aan zijn eindverantwoordelijkheidvoor het verbeteren van de patiëntveiligheid.Patiëntveiligheid, de rol van de bestuurder 379
summary in englishPatient safety – the role of the boardIntroduction – patient safety is a problem, boards have responsibility,there is no known solutionAround the globe patient safety has become a major issue in the health care.There is however a discrepancy between the gravity of the problem and thefrailty of the solutions. On one hand there is an incremental attention for theproblems regarding patient safety and ditto pressure on healthcare professionals,organizations and regulators to curtail the extent of unintendedharm to patients. On the other hand the pace at which solutions are appliedis frustratingly slow and the results of research on implemented solutionsare often ambiguous at best. Patient safety is proving to be a problem that isparticularly challenging to solve. In many western countries society andauthorities are increasingly holding healthcare managers and board membersresponsible for unsafety within their institutions. There is however noknown strategy for effective board-level leadership on patient safety improvement.This research focuses on how healthcare board members and managerscan lead sustainable patient safety improvements.The research question – patient safety, the role of the boardThe central question of this study is:- Did the board of the UMC Utrecht lead patient safety improvements effectively?There are several sub-questions, divided over three clusters:1 Theoretical- Which traits of the patient safety problem are relevant from a boardperspective?- Which problems impede boards in leading professionals and professionalorganizations?- Which strategies have been described to cope with these problems?2 Empirical- What kind of problems surfaced during the three studied cases?- Which strategies were applied to cope with these problems?- How have these strategies helped improve patient safety?380summary
- Page 329 and 330: - Initiatiefnemer is bij voorbaat v
- Page 331 and 332: 3 SamenvattingDit onderzoek richt z
- Page 333 and 334: alleen in de juiste onderlinge verh
- Page 335 and 336: 4 BeschouwingInleidingIn de vorige
- Page 337 and 338: ken die aan onveiligheid bijdroegen
- Page 339 and 340: Nuancering van de rol van processtu
- Page 341 and 342: de uitkomsten van dit onderzoek gen
- Page 343 and 344: • In dit onderzoek is gebleken da
- Page 346 and 347: Appendix AReferentiesSamenvattingSu
- Page 348 and 349: 1. Inleiding1.1 Voorgeschiedenis st
- Page 350 and 351: instellen van een Kerncommissie Pat
- Page 352 and 353: 2.4 UitwerkingEr moet één centraa
- Page 354 and 355: - Patiënten Service/ klachtenburea
- Page 356 and 357: Haar taken zijn:1 Het gevraagd en o
- Page 358 and 359: maatschappij kunnen behouden zonder
- Page 360 and 361: 6 Samenstelling Kerncommissie Pati
- Page 362 and 363: - Billings CE. The NASA Aviation Sa
- Page 364 and 365: - Evans RG, Cardiff K, Sheps S. Hig
- Page 366 and 367: - Linkin DR, Sausman C, Santos L, L
- Page 368 and 369: - Stolper E, van Bokhoven M, Houben
- Page 370 and 371: - Zwart DLM, van Rensen ELJ, Verhei
- Page 372 and 373: 3 Prescriptief- Hoe kunnen de uitko
- Page 374 and 375: en dus veilige, zorg te organiseren
- Page 376 and 377: Elke casus bestond uit een aantal o
- Page 378 and 379: ling op de bestaande theorie over p
- Page 382 and 383: 3 Prescriptive- How can the results
- Page 384 and 385: Side-effects of professionalismThe
- Page 386 and 387: - Root Cause Analysis (RCA), a meth
- Page 388 and 389: ing networks, writing reports) so t
- Page 390 and 391: Dankwoord- Allereerst wil ik mij pr
- Page 392 and 393: - De levenshouding die ertoe geleid
- Page 394 and 395: PublicatielijstPublicaties - boeken
- Page 396: Patiëntveiligheid, de rol van de b
summary in englishPatient safety – the <strong>rol</strong>e of the boardIntroduction – patient safety is a problem, boards have responsibility,there is no known solutionAround the globe patient safety has become a major issue in the health care.There is however a discrepancy between the gravity of the problem and thefrailty of the solutions. On one hand there is an incremental attention for theproblems regarding patient safety and ditto pressure on healthcare professionals,organizations and regulators to curtail the extent of uninten<strong>de</strong>dharm to patients. On the other hand the pace at which solutions are appliedis frustratingly slow and the results of research on implemented solutionsare often ambiguous at best. Patient safety is proving to be a problem that isparticularly challenging to solve. In many western countries society andauthorities are increasingly holding healthcare managers and board membersresponsible for unsafety within their institutions. There is however noknown strategy for effective board-level lea<strong>de</strong>rship on patient safety improvement.This research focuses on how healthcare board members and managerscan lead sustainable patient safety improvements.The research question – patient safety, the <strong>rol</strong>e of the boardThe central question of this study is:- Did the board of the UMC Utrecht lead patient safety improvements effectively?There are several sub-questions, divi<strong>de</strong>d over three clusters:1 Theoretical- Which traits of the patient safety problem are rele<strong>van</strong>t from a boardperspective?- Which problems impe<strong>de</strong> boards in leading professionals and professionalorganizations?- Which strategies have been <strong>de</strong>scribed to cope with these problems?2 Empirical- What kind of problems surfaced during the three studied cases?- Which strategies were applied to cope with these problems?- How have these strategies helped improve patient safety?380summary