Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />
Spain: Fondo de<br />
Ayuda<br />
al<br />
Desarrollo<br />
Spain : CARI<br />
Netherlands:<br />
ORET<br />
target group(s); living conditions; employment;<br />
economic growth; income distribution; geography<br />
(development area).<br />
Gender: equality; women’s rights; women in<br />
employment.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Environment: sustainable development; environmental<br />
protection; working environment.<br />
Democracy: human rights; good governance; anti<br />
corruption; HIV/AIDS control.<br />
Works and supply of goods and provision of services<br />
financed under Danish Mixed Credits must contain a<br />
degree of know-how and technology transfer to the<br />
contracting party.<br />
The FAD Internationalisation ‘grants and loans for export’ has as<br />
objective to grant financial support on concessionary basis to start<br />
or consolidate development relevant projects in developing<br />
countries, in the sectors education, sanitation, and electrification.<br />
Only all countries identified by the OECD as developing countries<br />
are eligible for this support.<br />
CARI is an instrument for international trade; it is not specifically<br />
development focused.<br />
All applications for ORET were (pre-) appraised against the<br />
development relevance. Development relevance was initially<br />
(up to 1998) assessed in terms of<br />
<br />
<br />
Contribution to employment in the recipient country,<br />
determined by the number of direct temporary and<br />
permanent jobs created; the indirect effects on<br />
employment were assumed to be implicit in the case of<br />
a positive economic return on the investment (the<br />
Economic Internal Rate of Return). After 1998, this<br />
was reformulated in “projects should have sustainable<br />
positive effects on employment and the business<br />
climate and the environment of development<br />
countries” 98 .<br />
Congruence with the development policy; Projects<br />
should be -as much as possible- in the interests of the<br />
poor (either as employees, consumers of the end<br />
product, or local residents). Projects should not harm<br />
the interests of women neither and, where possible,<br />
enhance the position of women. The negative<br />
formulation was chosen to attend the environmental<br />
projects<br />
Projects should be technically, financially and<br />
institutionally sustainable (for the institutional<br />
capacity, an certain assessment of the management<br />
capacity was required)<br />
In the regulation of 2002, the interpretation of development<br />
relevance was amended to: “a positive contribution to a<br />
see<br />
98 Description ORET/MILIEV programme 1999<br />
Final report – Appendix 8 – page 165