08.02.2014 Views

Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />

Spain: Fondo de<br />

Ayuda<br />

al<br />

Desarrollo<br />

Spain : CARI<br />

Netherlands:<br />

ORET<br />

target group(s); living conditions; employment;<br />

economic growth; income distribution; geography<br />

(development area).<br />

Gender: equality; women’s rights; women in<br />

employment.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Environment: sustainable development; environmental<br />

protection; working environment.<br />

Democracy: human rights; good governance; anti<br />

corruption; HIV/AIDS control.<br />

Works and supply of goods and provision of services<br />

financed under Danish Mixed Credits must contain a<br />

degree of know-how and technology transfer to the<br />

contracting party.<br />

The FAD Internationalisation ‘grants and loans for export’ has as<br />

objective to grant financial support on concessionary basis to start<br />

or consolidate development relevant projects in developing<br />

countries, in the sectors education, sanitation, and electrification.<br />

Only all countries identified by the OECD as developing countries<br />

are eligible for this support.<br />

CARI is an instrument for international trade; it is not specifically<br />

development focused.<br />

All applications for ORET were (pre-) appraised against the<br />

development relevance. Development relevance was initially<br />

(up to 1998) assessed in terms of<br />

<br />

<br />

Contribution to employment in the recipient country,<br />

determined by the number of direct temporary and<br />

permanent jobs created; the indirect effects on<br />

employment were assumed to be implicit in the case of<br />

a positive economic return on the investment (the<br />

Economic Internal Rate of Return). After 1998, this<br />

was reformulated in “projects should have sustainable<br />

positive effects on employment and the business<br />

climate and the environment of development<br />

countries” 98 .<br />

Congruence with the development policy; Projects<br />

should be -as much as possible- in the interests of the<br />

poor (either as employees, consumers of the end<br />

product, or local residents). Projects should not harm<br />

the interests of women neither and, where possible,<br />

enhance the position of women. The negative<br />

formulation was chosen to attend the environmental<br />

projects<br />

Projects should be technically, financially and<br />

institutionally sustainable (for the institutional<br />

capacity, an certain assessment of the management<br />

capacity was required)<br />

In the regulation of 2002, the interpretation of development<br />

relevance was amended to: “a positive contribution to a<br />

see<br />

98 Description ORET/MILIEV programme 1999<br />

Final report – Appendix 8 – page 165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!