08.02.2014 Views

Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

the Dutch government and the recipient;<br />

The project must not harm the interests of the poor or<br />

have a negative impact on disadvantageous groups,<br />

incl. women;<br />

Investments should stimulate sustainable economic,<br />

ecological and social development;<br />

The end user must be sufficiently capable, in all<br />

respects, of ensuring (long-term) sustainable<br />

management of the project;<br />

The share of the Dutch origin in the transaction has to<br />

be at least 60% of the total transaction amount (or at<br />

least 10% from the developing country);<br />

The price quality ratio of the transaction had to be in<br />

line with markets standards.<br />

After 2006, the projects in LDCs (ORET A) had to respond to<br />

international competitive bidding in accordance to OECD<br />

Guidelines 83<br />

In 1995, China was granted to so-called “Kok package”, implying<br />

that approximately 40-50% of all approved ORET/MILIEV funds<br />

had to be used for establishing trade relations with China. Late<br />

2003, this percentage was reduced to 20%, (similar to the<br />

maximum used for each single country). 84<br />

Out of the OECD-DAC list 85 , the ORET A for LDCs comprised the<br />

following 44 countries: Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbeidzjan,<br />

Belize, Bolivia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, China, Colombia, Dominican<br />

Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Fiji, Philippines, Georgia,<br />

Ghana, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Indonesia, Iran, Ivory<br />

Coast, Jamaica, Jordan, Cameroon, Kazakhstan, Kenya,<br />

Macedonia, Namibia, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Palestine Territories,<br />

Peru, Serbia-Montenegro, Sri Lanka, Surinam, Syria, Thailand,<br />

Tunisia, Vietnam.<br />

ORET B countries per July, 31st 2007 were: Afghanistan, Angola,<br />

Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Central African<br />

Rep., Comoro Islands, Congo Dem. Rep., Djibouti, Eritrea,<br />

Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Haiti, Yemen, Cape<br />

Verde, Kiribati, Laos, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi,<br />

Maldives, Mali, Mauretania, Mozambique, Nepal, Niger, Eastern-<br />

Timor, Rwanda, Salomon Islands, Samoa, Sao Tomé & Principe,<br />

Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Chad,<br />

Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia (Myanmar was excluded as a<br />

result of ILO observation on child labour).<br />

In the early years ORET offered a (minimum) grant of 40 %, while<br />

the costs of the commercial loan were often subsidised up to a<br />

see<br />

83 DAC Recommendation on Untying Official Development Assistance to the Least Developed Countries, DCD/DAC (2001)<br />

12/FINAL, amended on 15 March 2006 n- DCD/DAC (2006)25.<br />

84 Apart from China (that benefitted eight years of a preferential treatment), Ghana received a considerable share of the ORET<br />

funds (in 2007 China and Ghana together counted for 43,4% of the ORET-portfolio). Other frequent recipients were Vietnam<br />

(as an important LDC and emerging market), Indonesia and Tanzania.<br />

85 See for the actual list: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/40/43540882.pdf<br />

Final report – Appendix 8 – page 149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!