Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
the Dutch government and the recipient;<br />
The project must not harm the interests of the poor or<br />
have a negative impact on disadvantageous groups,<br />
incl. women;<br />
Investments should stimulate sustainable economic,<br />
ecological and social development;<br />
The end user must be sufficiently capable, in all<br />
respects, of ensuring (long-term) sustainable<br />
management of the project;<br />
The share of the Dutch origin in the transaction has to<br />
be at least 60% of the total transaction amount (or at<br />
least 10% from the developing country);<br />
The price quality ratio of the transaction had to be in<br />
line with markets standards.<br />
After 2006, the projects in LDCs (ORET A) had to respond to<br />
international competitive bidding in accordance to OECD<br />
Guidelines 83<br />
In 1995, China was granted to so-called “Kok package”, implying<br />
that approximately 40-50% of all approved ORET/MILIEV funds<br />
had to be used for establishing trade relations with China. Late<br />
2003, this percentage was reduced to 20%, (similar to the<br />
maximum used for each single country). 84<br />
Out of the OECD-DAC list 85 , the ORET A for LDCs comprised the<br />
following 44 countries: Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbeidzjan,<br />
Belize, Bolivia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, China, Colombia, Dominican<br />
Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Fiji, Philippines, Georgia,<br />
Ghana, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Indonesia, Iran, Ivory<br />
Coast, Jamaica, Jordan, Cameroon, Kazakhstan, Kenya,<br />
Macedonia, Namibia, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Palestine Territories,<br />
Peru, Serbia-Montenegro, Sri Lanka, Surinam, Syria, Thailand,<br />
Tunisia, Vietnam.<br />
ORET B countries per July, 31st 2007 were: Afghanistan, Angola,<br />
Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Central African<br />
Rep., Comoro Islands, Congo Dem. Rep., Djibouti, Eritrea,<br />
Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Haiti, Yemen, Cape<br />
Verde, Kiribati, Laos, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi,<br />
Maldives, Mali, Mauretania, Mozambique, Nepal, Niger, Eastern-<br />
Timor, Rwanda, Salomon Islands, Samoa, Sao Tomé & Principe,<br />
Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Chad,<br />
Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia (Myanmar was excluded as a<br />
result of ILO observation on child labour).<br />
In the early years ORET offered a (minimum) grant of 40 %, while<br />
the costs of the commercial loan were often subsidised up to a<br />
see<br />
83 DAC Recommendation on Untying Official Development Assistance to the Least Developed Countries, DCD/DAC (2001)<br />
12/FINAL, amended on 15 March 2006 n- DCD/DAC (2006)25.<br />
84 Apart from China (that benefitted eight years of a preferential treatment), Ghana received a considerable share of the ORET<br />
funds (in 2007 China and Ghana together counted for 43,4% of the ORET-portfolio). Other frequent recipients were Vietnam<br />
(as an important LDC and emerging market), Indonesia and Tanzania.<br />
85 See for the actual list: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/40/43540882.pdf<br />
Final report – Appendix 8 – page 149