Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />
The programmes listed in table 11 have been studied and analyzed on various<br />
components, being the eligibility conditions; the envisaged target group(s), the<br />
organization of the implementation, the magnitude of the portfolio, the appraisal and<br />
approval process, and the way trade relevance is balanced against development<br />
relevance.<br />
The corresponding questions have been summarized in the following table:<br />
Table 21: Elements of comparison among export support programmes<br />
Elements for<br />
comparison<br />
Brief<br />
description of<br />
instrument<br />
Special<br />
conditions<br />
funding?<br />
for<br />
Target group of<br />
the instrument<br />
Implementing<br />
Agency<br />
Magnitude of<br />
portfolio and<br />
budget<br />
Identification,<br />
application and<br />
approval<br />
Special<br />
requirements<br />
for approval<br />
Trade<br />
relevance<br />
Development<br />
relevance<br />
Corresponding questions<br />
What are the objectives? Is the programme applicable<br />
to the delivery of both goods and services? Is the<br />
programme open to all countries, or ODA countries<br />
only?<br />
Is the programme open to all products, or restricted to<br />
certain products, services or sectors (like<br />
infrastructural works)?<br />
Is the combination with other instruments (like TA)<br />
compulsory?<br />
Is the programme restricted to specific countries?<br />
Any restriction on tied aid?<br />
What are the final and intermediary beneficiaries? Is it<br />
a buyers or suppliers credit?<br />
Who implements the programme? Has it been outsourced<br />
to a (development) bank or agency?<br />
What is the duration of the instrument? Is the budget<br />
allocated annually and how much is the annual<br />
allocation?<br />
Who identifies the intervention? What is the application<br />
procedure (passive or active promotion) of the<br />
instrument? What is the approval procedure and who<br />
approves? Is the appraisal centralised or<br />
decentralised? Is the technical and financial appraisal<br />
out-sourced?<br />
What are the requirements for approval, for example<br />
with respect to national origin of products and<br />
services; country ceilings; additionality criteria? Any<br />
special condition on export insurance, transaction<br />
restrictions? Ex-ante assessment of price distortion?<br />
What criteria are used to determine the trade<br />
relevance of a transaction to the national economy, or<br />
exports?<br />
What criteria are used to determine whether a<br />
transaction is relevant for development of the partner<br />
country?<br />
Refer to<br />
Table 21.1<br />
Table 21.2<br />
Table 21.3<br />
Table 21.4<br />
Table 21.5<br />
Table 21.6<br />
Table 21.7<br />
Table 21.8<br />
Table 21.9<br />
As result of the methodological constraint not for all programmes all questions could be properly<br />
addressed, but the following tables present the available information.<br />
see<br />
Final report – Appendix 8 – page 141
Change language