Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FINEXPO EVALUATION existing operations, taking into account the benefits of any new project and existing operations supported; - Enhance financial risk assessment of new projects and existing operations by considering environmental aspects. The latter recommendation should be implemented by screening and classifying projects against their environmental impact before agreeing on any kind of financial support. DAC Extension of the 2001 recommendation to HPICs 2008 Participants (see previous) Participants (see previous) Principles and guidelines to promote sustainable lending practices in the provision of official export credits to low-income countries Lending activities must respect sustainable development and generate net positive economic returns. They must foster sustainable development by avoiding unproductive expenditures. They must preserve debt sustainability and support good governance and transparency. DAC Members shall: - observe any applicable minimum concessionality requirements of Low Income Countries to the IMF and to IDA, - consider the results of IMF/World Bank country-specific debt sustainability analyses for other countries, - require good governance from government authorities in a buyer country. The 2008 Accra Agenda for Action (AAA) on aid effectiveness It reaffirmed the commitment on untying aid, and called upon DAC members to elaborate individual plans by 2010 to untie their aid to the maximum extent and to improve reporting on the 2001 Recommendation. Revised arrangement for officially supported export credits The revised Arrangement incorporates all recent decisions and enhancements agreed by the participants, including the new Sector Understanding on Export Credits for Civil Aircraft and the adjusted Local Costs rules (extension of the amount of Local Costs that may be supported from 15% to 30% of the export contract value - 2007). 2008 2008 2009 see Final report – Appendix 6 – page 131
FINEXPO EVALUATION APPENDIX 7 – BELGIAN FOREIGN TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTIONS see Final report – Appendix 7 – page 132
Page 1 and 2:
KONINKRIJK BELGIË Federale Overhei
Page 3 and 4:
© FOD Buitenlandse Zaken, Buitenla
Page 5 and 6:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE 4.3.1. Q7. In hoe
Page 7 and 8:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE Methodologie van
Page 9 and 10:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE een beter gebruik
Page 11 and 12:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE goedkeuren, waard
Page 14 and 15:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE 1. MANDAAT 1.1. F
Page 16 and 17:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE 1.3. Insteek en f
Page 18 and 19:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE een aantal gevall
Page 20 and 21:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE 3. INTERNATIONALE
Page 22 and 23:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE Lopende (recu
Page 24 and 25:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE et al. 2008 15 ,
Page 26 and 27:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE of prioritaire la
Page 28 and 29:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE Ontbinding va
Page 30 and 31:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Gereconstrueerde
Page 32 and 33:
FINEXPO EVALUATION De vraag of
Page 34 and 35:
FINEXPO EVALUATION De levering en
Page 36 and 37:
FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.1.2. Q2. In ho
Page 38 and 39:
FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.1.3. Q3. In ho
Page 40 and 41:
FINEXPO EVALUATION De verziltin
Page 42 and 43:
FINEXPO EVALUATION In vraag 6 wordt
Page 44 and 45:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Hoewel FINEXPO d
Page 46 and 47:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Projecten passen
Page 48 and 49:
FINEXPO EVALUATION formeel in de zi
Page 50 and 51:
FINEXPO EVALUATION van € 5 tot
Page 52 and 53:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Grafiek 2: Cumul
Page 54 and 55:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Belgische bedrij
Page 56 and 57:
FINEXPO EVALUATION een verlies van
Page 58 and 59:
FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.6. Doelmatighe
Page 60 and 61:
FINEXPO EVALUATION met lokale klant
Page 62 and 63:
FINEXPO EVALUATION geëxporteerde g
Page 64 and 65:
FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.7. Impact Gele
Page 66 and 67:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Hoewel de OESO d
Page 68 and 69:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Er bestaan g
Page 70 and 71:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Ten slotte zou d
Page 72 and 73:
FINEXPO EVALUATION met de ‘lead d
Page 74 and 75:
FINEXPO EVALUATION FINEXPO maakt ge
Page 76 and 77:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Het besche
Page 78 and 79:
FINEXPO EVALUATION C2.2 De doeltref
Page 80 and 81:
FINEXPO EVALUATION see Final report
Page 82 and 83: FINEXPO EVALUATION see Final report
Page 96 and 97: FINEXPO EVALUATION APPENDIX 2 - MET
Page 98 and 99: FINEXPO EVALUATION availability and
Page 100 and 101: FINEXPO EVALUATION Netherlands Inte
Page 102 and 103: FINEXPO EVALUATION Relevance: 1. To
Page 104 and 105: FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.2. The project
Page 106 and 107: FINEXPO EVALUATION 8. To what exten
Page 108 and 109: FINEXPO EVALUATION Trade effectiven
Page 110 and 111: FINEXPO EVALUATION 15.2. Belgian Su
Page 112 and 113: FINEXPO EVALUATION Selection of the
Page 114 and 115: FINEXPO EVALUATION • a survey amo
Page 116 and 117: FINEXPO EVALUATION Sample of files
Page 118 and 119: FINEXPO EVALUATION Table 16: Distri
Page 120 and 121: FINEXPO EVALUATION The final select
Page 122 and 123: FINEXPO EVALUATION APPENDIX 5 - QUE
Page 124 and 125: FINEXPO EVALUATION 6. How ‘additi
Page 126 and 127: FINEXPO EVALUATION 33. As a result
Page 128 and 129: FINEXPO EVALUATION Tied ODA is boun
Page 130 and 131: FINEXPO EVALUATION USA, EC. the eff
Page 134 and 135: FINEXPO EVALUATION A - Federal Belg
Page 136 and 137: FINEXPO EVALUATION - Emerging count
Page 138 and 139: FINEXPO EVALUATION concerning price
Page 140 and 141: FINEXPO EVALUATION 1 represen
Page 142 and 143: FINEXPO EVALUATION The programmes l
Page 144 and 145: FINEXPO EVALUATION Denmark: Mixed c
Page 146 and 147: FINEXPO EVALUATION In 1983, the Dev
Page 148 and 149: FINEXPO EVALUATION Also for the eli
Page 150 and 151: FINEXPO EVALUATION the Dutch g
Page 152 and 153: FINEXPO EVALUATION arrangements exi
Page 154 and 155: FINEXPO EVALUATION The Department f
Page 156 and 157: FINEXPO EVALUATION Netherlands: ORI
Page 158 and 159: FINEXPO EVALUATION After the buyer
Page 160 and 161: FINEXPO EVALUATION The promotion of
Page 162 and 163: FINEXPO EVALUATION Netherlands: ORI
Page 164 and 165: FINEXPO EVALUATION of ORIO is at th
Page 166 and 167: FINEXPO EVALUATION Spain: Fondo de
Page 168 and 169: FINEXPO EVALUATION APPENDIX 9 - CUM
Page 170 and 171: FINEXPO EVALUATION MANAGEMENT RESPO
Page 172 and 173: FINEXPO EVALUATION Management respo
Page 174 and 175: FINEXPO EVALUATION dat vermeden wor
Page 176: KONINKRIJK BELGIË Federale Overhei
show all

Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?