Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />
6. How ‘additional’ was the FINEXPO financing arrangement? In other words, did the<br />
client have access to alternative concessional lending from other financiers, for<br />
example multilateral or bilateral investment funds?<br />
7. If you worked with local counterparts, did you include them during the project<br />
definition? For state-to-state loans, how did you include local institutions during<br />
the project definition and for the financial engineering?<br />
Input by FINEXPO<br />
8. How did you know FINEXPO? Did you have easy access to the FINEXPO services?<br />
9. Was the FINEXPO secretariat useful to answer the questionnaire (kind and quality<br />
of support)? Did FINEXPO provide advice in order to choose the financial<br />
instrument and its modalities?<br />
10. During the application period, did you receive support or guidance from the<br />
Belgian Embassy? And by one of the regional (Walloon, Flanders, Brussels)<br />
investment and trading promotion offices?<br />
Output of transaction<br />
11. In this FINEXPO supported transaction, what is the nationality of your main<br />
competitors? Can you compete on price? Does FINEXPO compensate for a price<br />
difference between you and your main competitors? (market conformity)<br />
12. FINEXPO sets conditions on development relevance, environmental aspects,<br />
labour and cultural heritage. What kind of technical guarantees were included in<br />
your bid to ensure the technical adherence to these conditions? Did you (or the<br />
client) conduct an environmental impact assessment? (technical quality)<br />
13. During implementation, did you provide information on the realisation of the<br />
activities to the client (progress reports) and did you provide a copy to FINEXPO?<br />
14. After completion of the transaction, did you receive any critical comment on the<br />
FINEXPO conditions?<br />
15. Did the FINEXPO supported transaction enable the establishment of new positions<br />
in <strong>Belgium</strong> in order to implement the project (temporary / permanent<br />
employment)?<br />
16. For this project, did you elaborate a user’s manual (or translations of existing<br />
manuals) or did you train personnel / staff in operational skills, maintenance or<br />
management? (institutional strengthening)<br />
17. Do you know how much temporary employment was created during<br />
implementation? [In the case of construction works] do you consider the<br />
construction techniques used as labour intensive and adapted to the local labour<br />
supply? (employment generation)<br />
Output of FINEXPO<br />
18. Was the duration of the FINEXPO application process predictable? And was this<br />
acceptable to your company and to the client?<br />
19. Did the conditions or procedures lead to undesirable delays? What could be<br />
improved?<br />
see<br />
Final report – Appendix 5 – page 123
Change language