Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

FINEXPO EVALUATION
15.2. Belgian Subcontractors of Belgian companies were able to conquer market
share
15.2.1. Number of new contracts signed within the country
15.2.2. Number of new contracts signed within the region
Sources: company survey – Methods: semi-structured interviews with suppliers
15.3. The Belgian market share increase in the beneficiary countries / FINEXPO
contributed to sustained international trade relation
15.3.1. Trade volume in the country
15.3.2. Signs of spin-off
15.3.3. Evolution of direct investments by Belgian companies in the
country
15.3.4. Evolution of the market share in the 8 countries targeted by
the agreement
Sources: field mission – Methods: desk research, collection of secondary documents
15.4. FINEXPO induces a catalytic impact on financing opportunities
15.4.1. Number of projects that included other financiers
Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey – Methods: desk research, semi-structured
interviews with suppliers
15.5. FINEXPO does not induce trade distortion
15.5.1. Number of projects answering to direct invitation / total
15.5.2. The cost of the intervention is acceptable compared to the
market price
15.5.3. The cost of the project, excluding the financial mechanism
isn’t higher than the one offered by the competitors
15.5.4. The cost of the intervention is assessed by FINEXPO
15.5.5. Signs of side effects on employment and business climate
15.5.6. Signs of side effects on trade relations
15.5.7. Complaints of Belgian competitors for unfair competition
Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey, interviews in Brussels, field mission – Methods:
desk research, semi-structured interviews with suppliers and clients and FINEXPO
secretariat
see
Final report – Appendix 3 – page 109