Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FINEXPO EVALUATION Trade effectiveness 12.7. The project created business linkage 12.7.1. Number of maintenance contract between supplier and client after a project 12.7.2. Number of deals between the same partners 12.7.3. Image of Belgian products/services in the sector Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey, field mission – Methods: desk research, semistructured interviews with suppliers and clients 12.8. Extent to which client’s capability to serve end-users has improved Sources: company survey, field mission – Methods: semi-structured interviews with suppliers 12.9. The project generated direct employment 12.9.1. Number of temporary (direct) employment created Sources: company survey – Methods: semi-structured interviews with suppliers 12.10. The project has an effect on institutional capacities 12.10.1. Number of maintenance contract between supplier and client after a project 12.10.2. Number of project designing user manuals 12.10.3. Number of training session organised by the beneficiary companies for their personnel 12.10.4. Number of institutional management training session organised by the beneficiary companies for the local institutions Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey, field mission – Methods: desk research, semistructured interviews with suppliers, challenge technique, collection of secondary documents Efficiency The analysis of efficiency relates to the services provided by FINEXPO and the interventions financed through FINEXPO. Question 13, efficiency of the services provided, focuses on the procedures. The basic question of efficiency is whether the same could have been done at a lower cost or whether more could have been done at the same cost. At the procedural level, the evaluation tried to analyze and compare the transaction costs of each of the financial instruments. (What is their cost? Is the duration of the selection process acceptable? What is the ratio between management costs and expenses?). Given the scope and limitations of this evaluation this was an approximate assessment, since time and resources available do not allow elaborating a quantified transaction cost analysis. Question 14 focuses on the interventions. As it is almost impossible to check whereas the prices were adequate after the beginning of a project, the team limited its assessment to the condition of procurements. The objective is to assess whether the procurement mechanism limits or not the risk that a company offers its services to price higher than the market price. 13. To what extend are the services provided by FINEXPO efficient? 13.1. The transaction costs are kept at a low level to the beneficiaries Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey, field mission – Methods: desk research, semistructured interviews with suppliers and clients see Final report – Appendix 3 – page 107
FINEXPO EVALUATION 13.2. The duration of the selection process is acceptable and predictable 13.2.1. Perception of the beneficiaries 13.2.2. Perception of the local counterpart 13.2.3. Perception of the administration Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey, interviews in Brussels, field mission – Methods: desk research, semi-structured interviews with suppliers, client and Belgian administration 13.3. The management cost is acceptable 13.3.1. Ratio between management costs (full time staff) and expenses (FINEXPO budget) Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research 14. To what extent are the projects supported by FINEXPO efficient? 14.1. The selection of the project minimize the risk that its cost is higher than the market price 14.1.1. Proportion of projects answering to a public tender 14.1.2. Proportion of project answering to a direct invitation 14.1.3. Proportion of project dealing directly with local institutions without external control Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research 14.2. The cost of the intervention is acceptable compared to the market price 14.2.1. Number of projects for which FINEXPO compensated a price difference between the beneficiary and its main competitor 14.3. The cost of the intervention is assessed by FINEXPO Sources: FINEXPO files, interview in Brussels – Methods: desk research, semi-structured interviews with FINEXPO secretariat Impact Given the dispersion of the projects financed, it is hard to assess precisely the long term effects resulting from FINEXPO and the impact on the development of the partner country. Therefore the impact analysis is limited to the impact of foreign trade. 15. To what extend has FINEXPO an impact on foreign trade? 15.1. Belgian companies were able to access new markets or extend their share at the market / FINEXPO enhanced productive capacity 15.1.1. Frequency of deals between the same traders 15.1.2. Number and volume of additional or repeated orders for the same or related Belgian companies 15.1.3. Number of new contracts signed within the country without the support of FINEXPO 15.1.4. Number of new contracts signed within the region by the same Belgian company 15.1.5. Signs of replication of projects by other Belgian or foreign companies Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey, field mission – Methods: desk research, semistructured interviews with suppliers see Final report – Appendix 3 – page 108
Page 1 and 2:
KONINKRIJK BELGIË Federale Overhei
Page 3 and 4:
© FOD Buitenlandse Zaken, Buitenla
Page 5 and 6:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE 4.3.1. Q7. In hoe
Page 7 and 8:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE Methodologie van
Page 9 and 10:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE een beter gebruik
Page 11 and 12:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE goedkeuren, waard
Page 14 and 15:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE 1. MANDAAT 1.1. F
Page 16 and 17:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE 1.3. Insteek en f
Page 18 and 19:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE een aantal gevall
Page 20 and 21:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE 3. INTERNATIONALE
Page 22 and 23:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE Lopende (recu
Page 24 and 25:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE et al. 2008 15 ,
Page 26 and 27:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE of prioritaire la
Page 28 and 29:
FINEXPO EVALUATIE Ontbinding va
Page 30 and 31:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Gereconstrueerde
Page 32 and 33:
FINEXPO EVALUATION De vraag of
Page 34 and 35:
FINEXPO EVALUATION De levering en
Page 36 and 37:
FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.1.2. Q2. In ho
Page 38 and 39:
FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.1.3. Q3. In ho
Page 40 and 41:
FINEXPO EVALUATION De verziltin
Page 42 and 43:
FINEXPO EVALUATION In vraag 6 wordt
Page 44 and 45:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Hoewel FINEXPO d
Page 46 and 47:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Projecten passen
Page 48 and 49:
FINEXPO EVALUATION formeel in de zi
Page 50 and 51:
FINEXPO EVALUATION van € 5 tot
Page 52 and 53:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Grafiek 2: Cumul
Page 54 and 55:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Belgische bedrij
Page 56 and 57:
FINEXPO EVALUATION een verlies van
Page 58 and 59: FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.6. Doelmatighe
Page 60 and 61: FINEXPO EVALUATION met lokale klant
Page 62 and 63: FINEXPO EVALUATION geëxporteerde g
Page 64 and 65: FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.7. Impact Gele
Page 66 and 67: FINEXPO EVALUATION Hoewel de OESO d
Page 68 and 69: FINEXPO EVALUATION Er bestaan g
Page 70 and 71: FINEXPO EVALUATION Ten slotte zou d
Page 72 and 73: FINEXPO EVALUATION met de ‘lead d
Page 74 and 75: FINEXPO EVALUATION FINEXPO maakt ge
Page 76 and 77: FINEXPO EVALUATION Het besche
Page 78 and 79: FINEXPO EVALUATION C2.2 De doeltref
Page 80 and 81: FINEXPO EVALUATION see Final report
Page 96 and 97: FINEXPO EVALUATION APPENDIX 2 - MET
Page 98 and 99: FINEXPO EVALUATION availability and
Page 100 and 101: FINEXPO EVALUATION Netherlands Inte
Page 102 and 103: FINEXPO EVALUATION Relevance: 1. To
Page 104 and 105: FINEXPO EVALUATION 4.2. The project
Page 106 and 107: FINEXPO EVALUATION 8. To what exten
Page 110 and 111: FINEXPO EVALUATION 15.2. Belgian Su
Page 112 and 113: FINEXPO EVALUATION Selection of the
Page 114 and 115: FINEXPO EVALUATION • a survey amo
Page 116 and 117: FINEXPO EVALUATION Sample of files
Page 118 and 119: FINEXPO EVALUATION Table 16: Distri
Page 120 and 121: FINEXPO EVALUATION The final select
Page 122 and 123: FINEXPO EVALUATION APPENDIX 5 - QUE
Page 124 and 125: FINEXPO EVALUATION 6. How ‘additi
Page 126 and 127: FINEXPO EVALUATION 33. As a result
Page 128 and 129: FINEXPO EVALUATION Tied ODA is boun
Page 130 and 131: FINEXPO EVALUATION USA, EC. the eff
Page 132 and 133: FINEXPO EVALUATION existing operati
Page 134 and 135: FINEXPO EVALUATION A - Federal Belg
Page 136 and 137: FINEXPO EVALUATION - Emerging count
Page 138 and 139: FINEXPO EVALUATION concerning price
Page 140 and 141: FINEXPO EVALUATION 1 represen
Page 142 and 143: FINEXPO EVALUATION The programmes l
Page 144 and 145: FINEXPO EVALUATION Denmark: Mixed c
Page 146 and 147: FINEXPO EVALUATION In 1983, the Dev
Page 148 and 149: FINEXPO EVALUATION Also for the eli
Page 150 and 151: FINEXPO EVALUATION the Dutch g
Page 152 and 153: FINEXPO EVALUATION arrangements exi
Page 154 and 155: FINEXPO EVALUATION The Department f
Page 156 and 157: FINEXPO EVALUATION Netherlands: ORI
Page 158 and 159:
FINEXPO EVALUATION After the buyer
Page 160 and 161:
FINEXPO EVALUATION The promotion of
Page 162 and 163:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Netherlands: ORI
Page 164 and 165:
FINEXPO EVALUATION of ORIO is at th
Page 166 and 167:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Spain: Fondo de
Page 168 and 169:
FINEXPO EVALUATION APPENDIX 9 - CUM
Page 170 and 171:
FINEXPO EVALUATION MANAGEMENT RESPO
Page 172 and 173:
FINEXPO EVALUATION Management respo
Page 174 and 175:
FINEXPO EVALUATION dat vermeden wor
Page 176:
KONINKRIJK BELGIË Federale Overhei
show all

Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?