Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />
Effectiveness<br />
The team differentiated between the effectiveness of the services provided by FINEXPO<br />
(question 11) and the effectiveness of the interventions (question 12).<br />
Question 12 assesses the contribution of FINEXPO to the objectives identified in the<br />
intervention logic. The team defined judgement criteria and indicators in a way that<br />
allows the deepest assessment possible. Indeed, given the dispersion of the projects<br />
financed, an impact assessment is not possible. Some effects or evolution might be<br />
highlighted but can’t be attributed to FINEXPO, especially when the projects are part of a<br />
broader programme.<br />
11. To what extent are the services provided by FINEXPO effective?<br />
11.1. The services provided are visible and accessible<br />
11.1.1. Evolution of the number of beneficiaries (Belgian companies)<br />
11.1.2. Perception of the accessibility by the beneficiaries or their<br />
representatives (BEF)<br />
11.1.3. Information is accessible / available in Embassies<br />
11.1.4. Information is accessible / available in chamber of commerce<br />
11.1.5. Information is accessible / available in public services<br />
11.1.6. Information is accessible / available in banks<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey – Methods: desk research, semi-structured<br />
interviews with suppliers<br />
11.2. The beneficiaries perceive the services as effective and of quality<br />
Sources: field mission – Methods: semi-structured interviews<br />
11.3. FINEXPO provided additional export<br />
11.3.1. Number of companies who would not have been able to<br />
formulate a proposal without FINEXPO<br />
11.3.2. Number of companies who had access to alternative<br />
concessional lending from other financiers<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey – Methods: desk research, semi-structured<br />
interviews with suppliers<br />
12. To what extend are the projects effective?<br />
Aid effectiveness<br />
12.1. The project induced social improvement<br />
12.2. The project induced economic improvement<br />
12.3. The project induced environmental improvement<br />
12.4. Sign of social negative effects of the projects / Extend to which the position of<br />
women and poor are not harmed, directly or indirectly<br />
12.5. Sign of economic negative effects of the projects<br />
12.6. Sign of environmental negative effects of the projects / Extend to which is not<br />
damaged directly or indirectly<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, field mission – Methods: desk research, semi-structured<br />
interviews with client, local stakeholder, Belgian Embassy, challenge technique (client will<br />
be informed prior to the mission to put together and produce evidence on<br />
outcome/results, leading role of local consultant), collection of secondary documentation<br />
see<br />
Final report – Appendix 3 – page 106
Change language