Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />
8. To what extend are the projects coherent with Belgian foreign trade<br />
policies?<br />
8.1. The project is in line with Belgian foreign trade policies and commercial<br />
objectives<br />
8.1.1. Perception of federal representatives on the field<br />
8.1.2. Sign of complementarities<br />
8.1.3. Sign of contradictions<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, field mission – Methods: desk research, semi-structured<br />
interviews with policy makers<br />
Coordination<br />
When questions 7 and 8 assess the coherence between FINEXPO and two federal policies,<br />
questions 9 and 10 assess the coordination between FINEXPO and external strategies<br />
that can have an effect on FINEXPO objectives in terms of development (the level of<br />
coordination with the main stakeholders in the recipient country – question 9) and trade<br />
(the level of coordination with the regions, as trade competency has been regionalised).<br />
9. To what extent are the projects coordinated with development policies from<br />
the local institutions and the other active donors in the country?<br />
9.1. The projects are in line with the local priorities<br />
9.1.1. Explicit reference to the local priorities<br />
9.1.2. Sign of complementarity<br />
9.1.3. Sign of contradictions<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, field missions – Methods: desk research, semi-structured<br />
interviews during field mission<br />
9.2. The projects are coordinated with the other donors’ activities in a specific<br />
country<br />
9.2.1. Existence of coordination bodies<br />
9.2.2. Participation to coordination meeting<br />
9.2.3. Participation to round table / fora<br />
9.2.4. Sign of complementarities<br />
9.2.5. Sign of contradictions<br />
Sources: field missions – Methods: desk research, semi-structured interviews during field<br />
mission<br />
10. To what extent are the projects coherent with Belgian regional foreign trade<br />
interventions?<br />
10.1. The project is coherent with the instruments of the federate entities<br />
10.1.1. Perception of federate entities representatives<br />
10.1.2. Sign of complementarity<br />
10.1.3. Sign of contradictions<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, interviews in Brussels, field mission – Methods: desk research,<br />
semi-structured interviews with policy makers<br />
see<br />
Final report – Appendix 3 – page 105
Change language