Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />
4.2. The project presents an analysis of the context and challenges<br />
4.2.1. Presence of an analysis of the context and challenges<br />
conducted by the company<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research<br />
4.3. The project refers to an analysis of the context<br />
4.3.1. Reference to an analysis of the context and challenges in the<br />
files conducted by an external institution<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research<br />
4.4. Local counterparts contributed to the formulation of the project<br />
4.4.1. Specific references to their participation in the files<br />
4.4.2. Number of meetings<br />
4.4.3. Opinion from the beneficiary (company)<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey, field mission – Methods: desk research, semistructured<br />
interviews with suppliers<br />
4.5. The local institutional environment is positively assessed<br />
4.5.1. Number of implemented projects with positive advice /<br />
number of implemented projects with negative advice<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research<br />
4.6. National development strategies are taken into consideration<br />
4.6.1. References to the national development strategies in the<br />
project files<br />
4.6.2. References to the national development strategies in the<br />
advice made by FINEXPO<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, field mission – Methods: desk research<br />
5. To what extent are the projects implemented relevant regarding foreign<br />
trade?<br />
5.1. The committee advice regarding economic prospects is always positive before<br />
implementing the project<br />
5.1.1. Number of implemented projects with positive advice /<br />
number of implemented projects with negative advice<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research<br />
5.2. The project is not commercially viable<br />
5.2.1. Evidence of a negative analysis of the commercial viability<br />
provided by the company<br />
5.2.2. Nature of the analysis<br />
5.2.3. Evidence of a negative analysis of the commercial viability<br />
provided by FINEXPO<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research<br />
5.3. The importance of the beneficiary company for the Belgian economy is<br />
assessed<br />
5.3.1. Presence of a positive assessment<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey – Methods: desk research<br />
see<br />
Final report – Appendix 3 – page 103
Change language