Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium

FINEXPO EVALUATION
2.1. The sustainability of the project is part of the selection process
2.1.1. Number of files / total observed including an assessment of
technical sustainability
2.1.2. Number of files / total observed including an assessment of
the financial sustainability
2.1.3. Number of files / total observed including an assessment of
the institutional sustainability
2.1.4. Number of projects / total observed planning capacity
development
Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research
2.2. The project has local counterparts
Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey – Methods: desk research, semi-structured
interviews with suppliers
2.3. The local counterparts have been actively involved in the design of the projects
2.3.1. Explicit reference made to the counterpart participation
2.3.2. Number of meetings
2.3.3. Opinion of the beneficiary parties (companies)
Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey – Methods: desk research, semi-structured
interviews with suppliers
2.4. An exit strategy is defined
2.4.1. Reference to an exit strategy in the files
Sources: FINEXPO files, company survey – Methods: desk research, semi-structured
interviews with suppliers
3. To what extent has the potential environmental sustainability of the projects
been taken into account?
3.1. The environmental sustainability of the project is part of the selection process
3.1.1. Number of files / total observed including an environmental
impact assessment
Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research
3.2. The committee advice regarding environmental sustainability is always positive
3.2.1. Number of implemented projects with positive advice /
number of implemented projects with negative advice
Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research
4. To what extent are the projects relevant for development?
The first 3 questions dealt with the importance of relevance into the selection process.
Questions 4 and 5 assess the relevance of the project themselves. The question is not
“how did FINEXPO assess relevance” but “Are the project really relevant?” therefore the
assessment does not focus on the procedures but on the intervention. Since the
consultants were not in a position to directly assess the relevance of the projects, indirect
criteria have been used in order to answer the questions.
4.1. The committee advice regarding development is always positive before
implementing the project
4.1.1. Number of implemented projects with a unanimous positive
advice / number of implemented projects with negative
advice by members of the committee or without advice of
the committee on that matter
Sources: FINEXPO files – Methods: desk research
see
Final report – Appendix 3 – page 102