Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Evaluatierapport (PDF, 6.47 MB) - Buitenlandse Zaken - Belgium
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINEXPO EVALUATION<br />
Relevance:<br />
1. To what extent has relevance been a selection criterion?<br />
The objective of this first question is to assess whether the relevance of the project is<br />
sought from the beginning of the process in relation with the two FINEXPO’s goals. This<br />
implies that the assessment focuses on the procedures and the means implemented to<br />
ensure the selection.<br />
1.1. Relevance for development is positively assessed<br />
1.1.1. Number of files / number of files observed taking into<br />
consideration the national / sectoral development strategies<br />
1.1.2. Number of files / total taking into consideration the Belgian<br />
development strategies<br />
1.1.3. Number of files / total taking into consideration the quality of<br />
the governance<br />
1.1.4. Number of files / total including environmental impact<br />
assessment<br />
1.1.5. Number of files / total including an assessment of the local<br />
capacities<br />
1.1.6. List of other criteria used by the committee to assess<br />
relevance<br />
1.1.7. Person / institution in charge of the assessment of relevance<br />
for development in <strong>Belgium</strong><br />
1.1.8. Person / institution in charge of the assessment of relevance<br />
for development in the recipient country<br />
1.1.9. Number of projects modified on the basis of the advice by<br />
the committee<br />
1.1.10. Number of projects selected despite a negative advice on<br />
relevance<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, interviews in Brussels - Methods: desk research, semi-structured<br />
interviews Belgian administration<br />
1.2. Relevance for foreign trade is positively assessed<br />
1.2.1. Number of files / total including an assessment of the<br />
relative importance of client to the Belgian economy<br />
1.2.2. Number of files/total including an assessment of the direct<br />
employment generation in <strong>Belgium</strong><br />
1.2.3. Person / institution in charge of the assessment of relevance<br />
for Belgian economy in <strong>Belgium</strong><br />
1.2.4. Person / institution in charge of the assessment of relevance<br />
for Belgian economic relations in the recipient country<br />
1.2.5. Number of projects modified on the basis of the advice from<br />
the committee<br />
1.2.6. Number of projects selected despite a negative advice on<br />
trade aspects<br />
Sources: FINEXPO files, interviews in Brussels - Methods: desk research, semi-structured<br />
interviews Belgian administration<br />
2. To what extent is the potential sustainability of the projects taken into<br />
account?<br />
Question 2 and 3 follow the same objective as question 1 being more specific on two<br />
aspects of the relevance for development, the second one – environmental sustainability<br />
– being explicitly required by the OECD guidelines.<br />
see<br />
Final report – Appendix 3 – page 101
Change language