LEWE NA APARTHEID: LIDMATE SE NARRATIEWE VANUIT 'N ...

LEWE NA APARTHEID: LIDMATE SE NARRATIEWE VANUIT 'N ... LEWE NA APARTHEID: LIDMATE SE NARRATIEWE VANUIT 'N ...

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
25.12.2013 Views

Bylaag 7: Gesprek 7 (4 November 1998) p518 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 what is the way forward? Now that we are here, what is the way forward? I feel bad when I think of apartheid. This question of trespassing I was charged with. The senior prosecutor said you cannot charge a person for trespassing when he goes to church. He assisted and on the third occasion than the senior prosecutor said maybe there is something we don't understand, the court had to resolve the matter, and I was found not guilty. And the court had to tell him, don't you think that you are the man who are actually trespassing by attending a black church in Thabong. The very same man, after all those things happened – I was working for the Old Mutual then – he went to Head Office General Management in Cape Town and said here in Quincy, you are having a terrorist and this man is terrorising the church and you must get rid of him in your employment if you don't want to see people being terrorists. This is the experience that we have gone through. Many of us. But let me stop here. Steve: Sorry I am late, one thing that I know is that apartheid was bad and if you put it into context it was theoretically right, taken out of the Bible but it was separating people within justice and oppression, and de-humanising them. As Quincy mentioned of reverent Z. There was a minister of Education, somebody. He, reverent Z, reported me to the minister that I am a terrorist and communist, because I was a communist in the church. I as a liberation theologian, I did not compromise anything, I remember a policeman, for he has gone out of the church, we shall not question him because he is above the law. What Martin Luther King always says, if a government is bred on violence there is social integration to the third generation. What is happening here in SA, what happened in the election is the result of what people have learned during the apartheid era. Because they were living in a state of fear, that fear bred in them violence. Now for the third generation we have to leave that. Furthermore, if you look at what apartheid did, as Tutu says, we must reconcile. He is biblically right when he say we must reconcile. He is right but it doesn't meet the requirements of a Biblical reconciliation. Hanlie: What do you mean when you say it doesn't meet the Biblical requirements? Steve: It doesn't meet the Biblical requirements. Let's take the story of Zachariah. He says to Lord Jesus, I am prepared, half of my wealth I shall give to the poor, all of those I have defrauded I give back four times. And the Lord says today salvation has come to this house, because this one also is a son of Abraham. With us it is useless papering on the wall when it has a crack and saying it the crack will close, because wounds of the past will resurface again when they have not been treated well. Truth and

Bylaag 7: Gesprek 7 (4 November 1998) p519 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 reconciliation today have gone straight to the matter. When apartheid was done there were laws, I obeyed it – lawfully or unlawfully – that defrauded people that made us what we are, and when you take that into context, you come back and say let us reconcile. Reconcile our what? We must reconcile on basic issues. Sometimes when I preach as a liberation theologian I know one thing when God has created humanity the first job that he gave them, he said all right took Adam by the hand and put him in the garden. He said look at it, it is yours. Now, when I, being a bona-fide of this country don't have (onduidelik), there shall never be peace, unless the basic issues of life are pressed head on. That's why I say if Mandela was a good president he should have made a radical change; this country should have been right by now. Hanlie: Wasn't there to little time for that? Steve: No, no. If he was radical he should have done all major things, it is now that they are approaching the elections in 1999 that they are trying to approach the problem of land. When they are removed from that position, who is going to address it again? Albert: Can we just hold that a little bit, we will get back to the reconciliation and what needs to be done. Let's just get more of the background of what the experience was. Thanks for your input. Rose, wat was jou ervaring, jy kom nou uit 'n ander gemeenskap uit. Rose: Apartheid gaan vir my gepaard met, as 'n ou dink aan apartheid dan is dit onmiddellik verdrukking. En verdrukking in die apartheidsjare het beteken minder: minder mens, minder werker, wat jy ook al aan minder kan sit, dit is apartheid. Nou nog steeds. As jy 'n wit hoërskool sou vergelyk met 'n kleurling hoërskool, dan is daar 'n baie groot verskil, en dit is weer 'n verskil in minder. Ons het 'n ding wat veronderstel is om 'n laboratorium te wees. Al wat daarin is, is 'n glaskas en wasbakke met die krane. Dis 'n laboratorium by 'n kleurlingskool. Dis waar ek praat van die minder. Tot en met 1983 was 'n kleuring onderwyser, swart onderwyser se salaris nog minder, bykans die helfte minder as 'n wit onderwyser s'n. (Onduidelike opmerking van Hanlie) Kan ek net noem, onder korreksie, is die etnies swart onderwysers se salaris nou met die nuwe regering aangepas. Voor 1994 het hulle minder gekry as wit en bruin. Hanlie: Ek het gedink dit hang af van die opleiding. Ek het aangeneem dat baie minder van hulle onderwysers die geleentheid gehad het om byvoorbeeld 'n vierjarige kursus

Bylaag 7: Gesprek 7 (4 November 1998)<br />

p519<br />

109<br />

110<br />

111<br />

112<br />

113<br />

114<br />

115<br />

116<br />

117<br />

118<br />

119<br />

120<br />

121<br />

122<br />

123<br />

124<br />

125<br />

126<br />

127<br />

128<br />

129<br />

130<br />

131<br />

132<br />

133<br />

134<br />

135<br />

136<br />

137<br />

138<br />

139<br />

140<br />

141<br />

142<br />

143<br />

144<br />

reconciliation today have gone straight to the matter. When apartheid was done there<br />

were laws, I obeyed it – lawfully or unlawfully – that defrauded people that made us<br />

what we are, and when you take that into context, you come back and say let us<br />

reconcile. Reconcile our what? We must reconcile on basic issues. Sometimes when I<br />

preach as a liberation theologian I know one thing when God has created humanity the<br />

first job that he gave them, he said all right took Adam by the hand and put him in the<br />

garden. He said look at it, it is yours. Now, when I, being a bona-fide of this country<br />

don't have (onduidelik), there shall never be peace, unless the basic issues of life are<br />

pressed head on. That's why I say if Mandela was a good president he should have<br />

made a radical change; this country should have been right by now.<br />

Hanlie: Wasn't there to little time for that?<br />

Steve: No, no. If he was radical he should have done all major things, it is now that<br />

they are approaching the elections in 1999 that they are trying to approach the problem<br />

of land. When they are removed from that position, who is going to address it again?<br />

Albert: Can we just hold that a little bit, we will get back to the reconciliation and what<br />

needs to be done. Let's just get more of the background of what the experience was.<br />

Thanks for your input. Rose, wat was jou ervaring, jy kom nou uit 'n ander gemeenskap<br />

uit.<br />

Rose: Apartheid gaan vir my gepaard met, as 'n ou dink aan apartheid dan is dit<br />

onmiddellik verdrukking. En verdrukking in die apartheidsjare het beteken minder:<br />

minder mens, minder werker, wat jy ook al aan minder kan sit, dit is apartheid. Nou nog<br />

steeds. As jy 'n wit hoërskool sou vergelyk met 'n kleurling hoërskool, dan is daar 'n<br />

baie groot verskil, en dit is weer 'n verskil in minder. Ons het 'n ding wat veronderstel is<br />

om 'n laboratorium te wees. Al wat daarin is, is 'n glaskas en wasbakke met die krane.<br />

Dis 'n laboratorium by 'n kleurlingskool. Dis waar ek praat van die minder. Tot en met<br />

1983 was 'n kleuring onderwyser, swart onderwyser se salaris nog minder, bykans die<br />

helfte minder as 'n wit onderwyser s'n. (Onduidelike opmerking van Hanlie) Kan ek net<br />

noem, onder korreksie, is die etnies swart onderwysers se salaris nou met die nuwe<br />

regering aangepas. Voor 1994 het hulle minder gekry as wit en bruin.<br />

Hanlie: Ek het gedink dit hang af van die opleiding. Ek het aangeneem dat baie minder<br />

van hulle onderwysers die geleentheid gehad het om byvoorbeeld 'n vierjarige kursus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!