De eenvoud en complexiteit van Opbrengstgericht Werken (PDF ...

feedback and marking against learning intentions. London: Institute of
Education, University of London.
Clarke, S., & McCallum, B. (z.j.-b). Gillingham Partnership Formative Assessment
Project 2000–2001: Final report on the third term of the project and final
conclusions. Third term focus: Target setting. London: Institute of Education,
University of London.
Copland, M. (2002). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for
school improvement in the Bay Area School Reform Collaborative. Stanford,
CA: Center for Research on the Context of Teaching, Stanford University.
Cullen, J.B., & Reback, R. (2006). Tinkering toward accolades: school gaming under
a performance accountability system. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic
Research. Working paper 12286. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12286.
Diamond, J., & Cooper, K. (2007). The uses of testing data in urban elementary
schools: Some lessons from Chicago. In P. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision
making. 106th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp.
241–263). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional
Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American
Sociological Review, 48(1), 147-160.
Ehren, M.C.M. (in voorbereiding). Responses of schools to accountability systems using
multiple measures; School improvement and strategic behavior of elementary schools in
New York.
Figlio, D.N. and Getzler, L.S. (2002). Accountability, ability and disability: gaming
the system. NBER working paper 9307. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9307.
Fink, D., & Stoll, L. (1998). Educational Change: Easier Said Than Done. In
Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (Eds.), International Handbook of
Educational Change, Vol. 5 [pp. 297-321]. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A metaanalysis.
Exceptional Children, 53(3), 199-208.
Fuhrman, S.H. (2003). Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education. CPRE
Policy Briefs RB-38.
Geijsel, P., Sleegers, P.J.C., Stoel, R.D. and Kruger, M.L. (2009). The Effect of
Teacher Psychological and School Organizational and Leadership Factors on
Teachers’ Professional Learning in Dutch Schools. The Elementary School
Journal, 109(4), 1-22.
Goertz, M.E. and Duffy, M.C. (2001). Assessment and Accountability Across the 50
States. Policy brief RB-33.
http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/rb33.pdf
Goertz, M., Oláh, L., & Riggan, M. (2009, December). Can interim assessments by
used for instructional change? CPRE Policy Briefs RB-51. Philadelphia:
Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Hall, B., & Hewitt-Gervais, C.M. (2000). The application of student portfolios in
primary/intermediate and self-contained/multi-age team classroom
environments: Implications for instruction, learning, and assessment. Applied
Measurement in Education, 13(2), 209-228.
Halverson, R., Grigg, J., Pritchett, R., & Thomas, C. (2005). The new instructional
leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools. WCER
Working Paper No. 2005-10. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education
Research (WCER).
35